TeSi: The Definitive Vultology

Home Page Forums Vultology & Learning Center TeSi: The Definitive Vultology

  • Auburn
    Keymaster
    • Type: TiNe
    • Development: l--l
    • F Attitude: Adaptive
    If you experience video loading problems, videos load better on Google Chrome.
    This article requires a working understanding of the vultology code.

     

    TeSi
    EDAMER

    Up until now the 16 vultologies of the types have still contained far too much variability within them that hasn’t been organized or explained. A percentage of mistypings would slip by especially with borderline cases (like NeFi-Te and TeSi-Ne) and we’ve had no tool or standard to help differentiate these cases. But now we’re moving into a very granular quantification of types based on the level of consciousness of each function — as it’s indeed proven possible to see this vultologically. It’s actually fascinating how well and easy it comes together, and how apparent it is once you see it. This represents the beginning of a new standard for CT, and a methodology that will be used going forward.

    Note: These annotations we’ve come up with (l—, ll–, lll-, llll, l–l, l-l-, l-ll, ll-l) have come to mean far more than what I anticipated. This post will thus double as an introduction to the TeSi vultology but also as a more thorough explanation as to what these annotations mean not just for TeSi but for all the types.
    I realized watching vids has been a drag up til now, but do watch the videos here as they’ve been completely cleaned up for this occasion. Each is an unbroken 2-3 minutes of footage of only the subject¬†(more details on this later). I also have side-by-sides at the end of some posts so you can see more clearly what the signature looks like. Each development level has a different vultology and you can check any new sample against this list of TeSi’s to see what their development is.

    Final Note: These visuals are matched together not only by eight development levels but also by attitude of the F function (seelie/unseelie), the presence or absence of flat affect, and by gender. When all these variables align in the same people (creating a 1 in 1024 match), the two individuals are essentially/automatically¬†twin shades¬†(which helps if they’re also the same age/ethnicity). This new level of resolution will be the standard, which has a maximum number of 4096 when¬†Ego/Subtype¬†is factored in. However, ego is something that can’t be measured vultologically but instead by examining psychology and what people say. To some extent this can be intuited from what they say in these short clips but it’s better addressed through prolonged exposure and study of the person.¬†(more info on this granular system can¬†be found here)¬†This thread will also be updated in the future as more gaps are filled in for all the possible developmental variants of the TeSi.

    • This topic was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
    • This topic was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
    • This topic was modified 2 weeks, 1 day ago by Auburn.
    Auburn
    Keymaster
    • Type: TiNe
    • Development: l--l
    • F Attitude: Adaptive

    TeSi l— Unseelie Female / The Self-Empowered (Anti)Feminist

    Spoiler:

    Compilation (watch full-screen)

    Below the vids I’ll be describing just how the vultology is similar/different from other developments, starting with this l— one as a baseline. This baseline applies mainly to females; male samples have a different quality (see below). As we’d expect of a Je-lead, the l— female is articulate, angular and forward. There’s rigidity to the body, Je seriousness, conductor energy and closure in each gesture.

    However, it’s not quite at Camile Paglia level. Curiously we’ve found that a TeSi l— actually doesn’t have the “most” visible Te of the developments and in some ways it has less than the l-l- (TeNe) development. This is because “double extroversion” causes the most Pe and Je in any type, being a combination of jittery/amped energy augmenting one another. Je by itself and Pe by itself are far less manic than when together. This is really great to see, and is clarifying a lot of things.

    Qualia: The qualia we see here is a sassy but commanding one. There’s a bossiness to these samples wherein they elevate their own importance through their views; all the while remaining somewhat unreachable/cold via their Te. They appear to be standing on a podium making a proclamation. This is a type of King/Queen energy.

    Psychological Profile:

    Their personality can be summed up as:

    • Blunt, Frank, Opinionated, Snarky, Critical.
    • Unafraid to unpack really heated or taboo topics. (i.e. rape, sex, corruption)
    • “Un-lady-like” (in some ways) (i.e. not very “feminine”)
    • Generally very political with a strong opinion for or against Feminism.
    • Battling issues of identity and identity politics.
    • Motifs of Self-Empowerment & Competence

    All of them hold political convictions, often center around identity politics. All of them are very rational in their approaches and articulate in their reasons. In the case of Lauren Southern we see some glimmers of Si traditionalism & conservative values backed up by strong Te rationality. In the case of Rebecca Watson we see feminism that tries to publicly “break” the stereotypes women are pigeonholed into. We’ll see further down below that this is a common trend, with TeSi women being the most outspoken against the typical Feminine Archetype, given how they are the type most energetically opposed to that gender. It seems to be the case that TeSi women, more than other women, highly dislike being looked at as frail, in need of care, stay-at-home, unable to thrive or in any way being held back from climbing the corporate ladder (the Meritocratic game) by their gender. Again there is in here an internal divide caused by an inability to properly integrate their own femininity, which is situated in their polar function.

    However we see in Lauren a balance to that viewpoint, where she’s accepted that statistically speaking there is a reality to the feminine/masculine divide, despite how she or any one female might fit in that spectrum. TeNi Camile Paglia has arrived somewhere similar, but not without going through a strong feminist phase of her own. It seems as though TeSi often need to “outgrow” the feminist phase, as they simultaneously integrate more of themselves into their ego.

    TeSi l— Unseelie Male / The Corporate Businessman

    Spoiler:

    Compilation (watch full-screen)

    You’ll notice that the male baseline has a bit more angularity to it. The TeSi l— females have slightly more casual hand gestures and a subtle softness to their delivery that the TeSi l— males lack. And like the above, the TeSi l— male doesn’t have the “most” rapid Te signals (which happen when Je+Pe combine) but is fairly consistent, forward and exacting in their delivery. There is no Pe buoyancy or spontaneity. The TeSi l— is methodical, serious, corporate, and commanding.

    Qualia: The qualia we see here is a paternal one. They will have a Kingly energy to them, appearing ‘in charge’ and ready to give orders. There is a militancy to them, a managerial energy and a matter-of-fact-ness.

    Psychological Profile:

    Their personality can be summed up as:

    • Blunt, Frank, Opinionated, Matter-of-Fact
    • Business-Minded, Entrepreneurial
    • Politically inclined
    • Patriarchal / Masculine
    • Economically savvy
    • Meritocratic, Pro-Capitalism
    • Often Anti-Socialism

    In the case of Ted Cruz and Tucker Carlson we see what can be described loosely as a modern ‘republican’ mindset. This development of TeSi is a go-getter who wants to make it big and believes in the American dream of success through hard work. They are often against social programs that tax those who have ‘earned it’ by their own merits. They often believe society can thrive best on a classical/laissez-faire economic policy. There’s often a keen understanding of economics in general, being essentially a causal/mechanical system of merit-exchange. This can be thought of as an analog to the FeSi’s understanding of the emotional economic exchange between parties. We see in Chris Wallace and Jake Tapper also an “anchor” motif, with their political inclinations also spanning more generally into “news.” Altogether this shade is the political news anchor, business-man, lawyer, economist and entrepreneur.

    Unlike the females of this development who contend with their own femininity, the TeSi is more straightforward here since the system in place favors their gender. There are less complaints in the department of gender equality, although there are also conservative undertones. This TeSi development isn’t exactly “cautious” (often they take big money gambles; every business venture is a type of gamble), but they have a level of nationalistic reservation and conscientiousness. A “keep the borders tight” mentality, as Jordan Peterson likes to say.

    TeSi l— Seelie Female / The Faux-Fe Manager

    Spoiler:

    Compilation (watch full-screen)

    Their vultology is not as sassy as that of the TeSi unseelie females, who tend to have more of a chill to them – even more than the unseelie male baseline. Instead their vultology is slightly closer to that of the male l— baseline but with an added softness and airiness in the voice. There’s often a “husky” or breathy/crackling quality present.

    Qualia: As discussed below, these samples have a very Paternal, Queen-like energy. They are here to defend the populace, and especially those they care for, using their intellect to solve the difficult problems in the way of them and security. They can be pictured having a benevolent authority in their workplace.

    Psychological Profile:

    Their personality can be summed up as:

    • Business Minded (CEO/etc)
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Humanitarian Concerns
    • Leadership & Advocacy
    • Maternal/Protector

    These three lack the blunt edge of their unseelie counterparts. In the case of Terri Orbuch we see love/relationship advice and self-help. In Drew Barrymore we hear of a very nurturing mother, and a businesswoman with a product line. And in Kelly Eckerman we see activism and concern for cancer/diseases caused by inappropriate water supplies along the same lines as TeSi Erin Brockovich below. Being women, their maternal energy meshes in with their Te to create a “protector” or “guardian.” These woman showcase how a Te-lead doesn’t necessarily have to be hard as nails. In fact, seelie female Te-leads in general tend to be mistaken for Fe-leads.

    But they’re clearly different from Fe-leads, despite similarities in manifestation and interests. Unlike Fe-leads who carefully mediate emotions between people, these women often choose to help more through logistical routes. While the Fe-lead woman moves hearts with ethos, using emotional shepherding, these women aim to convince others to place more resources towards important “solutions.” Matters are still seen in the framework of real-world problems to be solved, allowing their Te to shine as a problem-solver. They’re often friendly and caring, but still carry a ‘corporate’ vibe to them and a militant undertone.

    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
    Auburn
    Keymaster
    • Type: TiNe
    • Development: l--l
    • F Attitude: Adaptive

    TeSi ll– Unseelie Male / The Un-Retired Grandfather

    Spoiler:

    Compilation (watch full-screen)

    This is interesting now, because what we see here is the same sort of Je-lead rigidity as l—, except a more inertial delivery of each hand gesture and head nod. The body appears to lag behind a bit, even though it is not drifting or swaying like a Pi-lead. The head is still face-centric. Each head nod and angular movement still delivers it’s closure, but with less of a hurry. The TeSi ll– is more energetically introverted than the TeSi l—, due to a balance of introverted and extroverted energy.

    Qualia: The qualia we see here is a seasoned old King. A wise old patriarch. The energy is still commanding, leader-like but also embedded with Senex energy. One gets the sense that they are sitting atop their successful life, rather than trying or fighting to be successful. Tempered. Learned.

    Psychological Profile:

    Their personality can be summed up as:

    • Specialized in certain areas of knowledge
    • Historical / Narrativist
    • Prolific career, lots of information behind them
    • Sitting on a nest or large body of works
    • Entrepreneurial

    Overall this type appears to give the vibe of being “comfortable in retirement.” Unfortunately most our examples so far are old, but I’m sure with a wider database we’ll find younger samples too. It’s not inconceivable, however, that age brings about Si more in TeSi’s. The once ambitious edge of their Te has been smoothed out and what might have been avid ambition becomes a novel interest or hobby. We see in James Cameron a passive interests in deep sea exploration and geography (Si), which he pursues at his leisure. We see in Tolkien a writing habit that spans thousands of pages. Being Te-leads, they still have plenty of “oomph” to dedicate to whatever they fancy — and indeed they tend to fancy a lot of different eclectic interests. They’re never quite “retired” because their lead Te function still gives them a busybody tendency. And so they are partially an “executive” and partially a veteran/advisor.

    They tend not to be as political as TeSi l— types and instead they seem to be more about amassing information (encyclopedic) and sharing that information. They focus their Je on creating a body of work/portfolio (in acting, film, etc) that centers around their preferred crafts. Still, if any of their interests call upon the need for management (which they often can, like James Cameron being a film director) they can still be known for being commanding and exacting in that domain.

    TeSi ll– Seelie Male / The Polymath Grandfather

    Spoiler:

    More data still needed here, but Bob DeMaria is visually quite the same as the above samples. The difference is that Bob has a stronger seelie Fi focus on healing and the body. But likewise we see in him a seasoned wisdom and a large body of expertise.

    TeSi ll– Seelie Female / The Faux-Fe Grandmother

    Spoiler:

    Like the males, what we see here is the same sort of Je-lead rigidity as l—, except a more inertial delivery of each hand gesture and head nod. The body appears to lag behind a bit with reservation, even though it is not drifting or swaying like a Pi-lead. The head is still face-centric. Each head nod and angular movement still delivers it’s closure, but with less of a hurry. The TeSi ll– is more energetically introverted than the TeSi l—, due to a balance of introverted and extroverted energy.

    Qualia: The qualia we see here is a maternal one. Beatrice appears courteous but also parental; nurturing but also very mature. Motherly, and/or Grandmotherly.

    Psychological Profile:

    Their personality can be summed up as:

    • Specialized in certain areas of knowledge
    • Prolific career, lots of information behind them
    • Leadership focus
    • Sensitive/Nurturing

    We only have Beatrice in this category right now, so we’ll focus on her. She’s seelie, so she carries the same Maternal energy that the TeSi l— women do. It’s a sort of faux-Fe due to seelie Fi + feminine energy atop of a Te lead function. However, we see in her main works like this one:

    …a focus on leadership, as we’d expect. Like TeSi Barbara Sher, she writes about “how to succeed.” And we see in works like this (below) the prolific, Si-compartmentalization and voluminous quantification of phenomenon:

    ..for any of you who have owned the book, you know it’s quite a fat one, and like with TeSi ll– Tolkien we see the encyclopedic imprint of Si present. TeSi ll– differ from SiTe l— in that the latter is content experiencing life in that narrative sense, while the TeSi ll– likes to write (articulate) about it. And so the TeSi ll– engages in a kind of delineation and crystallization of “narrative.” This is the same thing TiNe l-l- Noam Chomsky does, using his lead-Ti to categorize, organize and rationally align all the massive datasets brought upon by Si.

    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
    Auburn
    Keymaster
    • Type: TiNe
    • Development: l--l
    • F Attitude: Adaptive

    TeSi l-l- Unseelie Female / The Sarcastic Spokeswoman

    Spoiler:

    Compilation (watch full screen)

    Now this shade has quite a different vultology. Joy Behar and Germaine Greer side-by-side have the clearest depiction of l-l- when unseelie.
    They retain the same ‘in charge’ and commanding (corporate) energy as previous Te-leads, but also insert a great deal of jesting comedy into it. Their energy is doubly extroverted, causing an excitation of both their Te and Pe energy. However, their Ne’s fluidity never breaks out of the rigid Je-lead architecture of their dominant function. I will make a comparison to the NeFi l-l- soon to show the difference.

    Qualia: The two qualities we see mixed here are that of the Queen and the Puer. It will feel as if the queen is ‘letting loose’ a little from her usual seriousness, but never really disarming herself or succumbing to directionless joviality. Their parodies seem timed and executed, rather than sporadic.

    Psychological Profile:

    Their personality can be summed up as:

    • Jesting / Bantering
    • Sarcastic & Ball-busting
    • Quirky & Off-Beat
    • Nonchalant & Deadpan
    • Focused on Comedy
    • Talk-show / Conversationalist / Commentator tendencies

    We see in Joy Behar the epitome of this development. Behar is outspoken, blunt, sarcastic, unashamed to talk about wild topics and all the while doing it with ease of articulation. The already unfiltered lead Te takes in a friend in Ne, who allows for the same blunt humor to have a quirky delivery. The TeSi l-l- is perhaps the most talkative of the TeSi, having an avalanching quality to their speech. This makes them great commentators on pop culture and news. Like their fellow TeSi l—, there’s at least some affinity for politics which often supplies the material for them to source from with their Te+Ne combo. While Behar and Greer are more similar to each other, Tina Fey and Anna Kendrick are more similar to each other. We see in these two more of an acting orientation, less political and more improvisational. But both can dish out and take it, and often jest with their interviewers and also are attracted to comedy roles.

    TeSi l-l- Seelie Female / The Silly Spokeswoman

    Spoiler:

    The vultology of this shade is a bit less sarcastic than the unseelie ones, but still a curious combination of “corporate” but “playful.” The combined effect of Te+Ne creates parodies, perk-ups and higher momentum.

    Psychological Profile:

    Their personality can be summed up as:

    • Witty / Comedian
    • Corporate / Businesswoman
    • Articulate (Talkative)
    • Into news/current-events
    • Agreeable & Funny

    These three all happen to be news anchors who use their Te for delivery, but also have plenty of fun at their job and have a jolly personality overall. But despite this goofy outward composure, they’re still serious businesswomen underneath with dedication to their careers. They are researchers and have a fair understanding of law and policies. They lack the snarky/sarcastic edge of their unseelie counterparts, and instead resemble the seelie TeSi l— woman in more ways. However, rather than having a maternal/guardian energy accomanying them, they have more of a puer energy about them.

    TeSi l-l- Unseelie Male / The Eccentric Nerd

    Spoiler:

    Psychological Profile:

    Their personality can be summed up as:

    • Satirical Political Commentary
    • Witty / Comedian
    • Corporate / Businessman
    • Eccentric Nerd
    • Into fantasy/Sci-Fi worlds

    The first three (Carmack, Colbert, DeFranco) represent an interesting mix of competent, prolific, and eccentric. All three are busybodies who have extensive careers/portfolios that dabble into a wide assortment of things. But all of their careers are marked by certain affinities. In the case of Colbert and DeFranco we see satire on political commentary. In the case of Colbert and Carmack we see Sci-Fi/Fanasy affinities, with Colbert being an outspoken hardcore Tolkien geek, and Carmack being an avid video game junkie and computer programmer. Tim Allen better fits into the Joy Behar and Germaine Greer category above. Like Behar, he capitalizes on the humor between the lies of our politically correct expectations. Tim Allen also has an extensive career filled with comedy movies. In general the TeSi l-l- development is saturated with comedians and Tim Allen is no exception.

    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
    Auburn
    Keymaster
    • Type: TiNe
    • Development: l--l
    • F Attitude: Adaptive

    TeSi l–l Unseelie Female / The Rational Ethicist

    Spoiler:

    This was an unexpected discovery. When any J-lead is l–l in development, they develop a doubly rigid body posture. If you compare Ayn Rand to the TeSi l— women, you will immediately note that she is far more introverted but not in the TeSi ll– sense. Instead Ayn Rand is more introverted in the rigid/snappy/poised sense which completely resists inertia. Her body is absolutely resisting any randomness and every gesture comes out with deliberation before she returns again to a sedentary position. This is both unlike the TeSi l— and the TeSi ll–, indicating a different vultology altogether. This development also is prone to micro-jitters where the body remains so stiff that Te angular movements are confined to a very narrow space.

    I was able to understand this better by seeing TeSi l–l Richard Dawkins below:

    TeSi l–l Unseelie Male / The Scientific Ethicist

    Spoiler:

    At first it seems inconceivable that Richard Dawkins, of all people, has conscious Fi but it makes sense if you consider it is conscious and unseelie. Unseelie Fi, after all, is quite moralistic, disgust-prone, and defensive. Dawkins is famous for his heated disapproval of religion and he takes very personal offense to the indoctrination of children with unscientific information. Dawkins is a kind of Fi advocate here — of a similar sort who might advocate against physical child-abuse. Dawkins considers it a form of child-abuse that defenseless minds are told what to believe, especially when it is untrue. Dawkins, unlike his other TeSi businessman counterparts, is not driven by financial gains but instead by a compounded Te-Fi agenda of truth-seeking and moralistic proclamation.

    Richard Dawkins, Ayn Rand and Germaine Greer (when older) have very similar vultologies characterized by a Je-lead commanding and accentuating vultology, but also a poised and receding posture. Their head nods are exceptionally jittery and concise.

    Psychological Profile:

    Psychologically, what differentiates these three from other TeSi’s is a very axiomatically airtight ideology which one might mistake for Ti in some areas. Ayn Rand’s philosophy is not a commentary on modern politics (re: TeSi l—), but a timeless principle-based paradigm. And this is the key psychological feature that is added by the conscious presence of Fi. The TeSi l–l is concerned, much like the Ji-leads, with arriving at the “right” universal positions in respect to philosophy, morality, and logic/reason.

    Ayn Rand perhaps embodies this even stronger than Richard Dawkins, developing her philosophy of objectivism. And yet just like Dawkins (and unlike Ti-leads) she comes to a sort of principle-based conclusion that the way to live one’s life is to rely on nothing that isn’t supported by evidence. Like Dawkins she is deeply offended when people choose to act on whims and has her own grievances with love, sentimentality and the like. The effect we see here is as though a Ti-lead had arrived at the axiomatic conclusion that materialism is the philosopher’s stone. But the conclusion comes from a Te-Fi hybrid.

    Like with the TeSi ll–, the TeSi l–l is somewhat ambiverted in their energy. Their Ji holds them back somewhat, while their Je pushes them forward. But unlike Ji-leads, there is no exerted push present. One does not get the sense that they’re Reviser types struggling to get their words out, but instead they are Je-lead types who have natural and easy articulations/gesticulations…. that are being clamped down by heavy Ji.

    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
    Auburn
    Keymaster
    • Type: TiNe
    • Development: l--l
    • F Attitude: Adaptive

    TeSi lll- Unseelie Male

    Spoiler:

    ^ Now looking at these, they don’t look quite like any of the aforementioned TeSi. They’re not as angular as the l—, but also not as inertial as the ll–. And they’re also not as jumpy as the l-l-. This is one of the hardest developments to pin down initially (all 3 function and 4 function developments are really difficult), but it’s also not as hard as it seems once you isolate what is happening.

    Roughly speaking what is happening is:

    The lll- development is P-heavy. So there are 2 P functions for only 1 conscious J function. Thus overall they look curiously fluid and casual. It’s tempting to mistake them for P-leads, yet they still have that accentuated Je head nodding, the accentuated and angular delivery, and overall conductor comportment. They’re toned-down like in the ll– developments yet they still retain all the funny/comedian/parodies of the l-l- development.

    What’s happening here, if we think about it from another angle, is you have a “double extrovert” (l-l-) …with an introverted function (Si) added in. And so while Ne augmented the extroversion, with Si added in the energy reverses back down.

    Psychological Profile:

    Their personality can be summed up as:

    • Satirical Political Commentary
    • Witty Comedians
    • Talkative / Talk-show-hosts
    • Prolific career, lots of information behind them
    • Sitting on a nest or large body of works

    All three of the above are comedians. They are typically political in their commentary like the l—, but like the ll– they are also rather detached from rigid political ideologies. They’re neither corporate tycoons, nor are they paradigm builders like the l–l. You could say they’re “a little of everything” which is also why I suspect 3 function development means the libido/energy is spread more evenly across various focal points rather than concentrated in one direction. Still as with all Je-leads, they are very verbal. Their craft revolves around rhetoric and like the ll– it’s not enough just to live/be/exist in the inertia of the Pi function. The TeSi lll- translates/articulates (Te) “how the world is” (Si) through comedy (Ne).

    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
    Auburn
    Keymaster
    • Type: TiNe
    • Development: l--l
    • F Attitude: Adaptive

    ll-l

    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
    Auburn
    Keymaster
    • Type: TiNe
    • Development: l--l
    • F Attitude: Adaptive

    TeSi l-ll Seelie Female

    Spoiler:
    This development is under revision, and not properly represented.

    Compilation (watch full screen)

    Elizabeth Warren is one of a kind here (for now: nope! found a twin). She has a TeSi vultology that has been incredibly illuminating to me. It’s best to approach her development from the l–l angle. As we discussed, l–l development is extremely rigid and tends towards micro-jittering. Now, if you take this double-rigidity and micro-jittering, and you augment it with Ne momentum, you get Elizabeth Warren. She’s super speedy, super jittery but her movements aren’t hitting one head nod at a time. They’re quite amped up and expedient. By the way, TeNi Camile Paglia is also l-ll so imagine her too.

    While Si slows down the l-l- development with inertia, Fi appears to tense it up in a way. It’s as if all of that Te+Ne energy is clamped and so it gets concentrated into a smaller space (smaller waveforms but more frequent):

    The peaks and valleys of Je accentuations are smaller, but they happen more often. At least that appears to be the case so far. Both introverted functions do something slightly different in how they restrain the energy of the body.

    Warren is at core a polarized TeSi. Like the TeSi l–l types, she cares deeply about Fi issues, about integrity, rightnesss and is also quite seelie and empathic toward the population. She is very well positioned in ther Te/Fi axioms. But she’s also got a fun side to her. She’s affable, gregarious, and a little goofy.

    Notice however that she doesn’t have conscious Si. She’s not yet given up on “making it big” or “making a difference” and she believes in overhauling (anti-Pi) things that don’t work. She’s ambitious, progressive, future oriented and also naively optimistic in similar ways to high Ne+Fi users. Another way to think about it is that she has a “NeFi Seelie Fairy” embedded within her Te-lead architecture.*

    Like TeNi l-ll Camile Paglia she almost trips over her words from the velocity with which her Te+Ne combo talks. But her Ne isn’t overtaking the potency of her first oscillation. If a type ever has their two polar functions developed (l–l) then even if they have a third function in there…. the primary drama of the psyche remains the first oscillation. Likewise, for Warren l–l is the root cause, and Ne provides the open mindedness, expediency and solution-generation towards that aim.

    * ps. Inversely… TeNi l-ll Camile Paglia has an “Unseelie SeFi Haughty” embedded within her Te-lead architecture.

    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
    Auburn
    Keymaster
    • Type: TiNe
    • Development: l--l
    • F Attitude: Adaptive

    TeSi llll Seelie Female

    Spoiler:
    This development is under revision, and not properly represented.

    I have Brene Brown down as TeSi l–l as a base. But in this video above she is at the very least modulating all 4 functions beautifully. This is the first video (in this new database refinement) where I’m sure she’s utilizing all 4 functions at conscious capacity. I had to cut out all clips that didn’t have her in the proper framing, but for those who haven’t seen her TED talk I’d really recommend it¬†here.

    In what she says, and in her delivery we see Te-lead. She is articulate, concise, angular, but also scientific, objective, rational and militant. But she’s also motherly/grandmotherly in the way she tells her story. She is not preaching to you, she is… conveying her narrative (Si) for what it is. She’s also a researcher and “collects stories”, and herein we see the librarian/encyclopedic proclivities of Si further. She states she has an organizational habit (highlighers, cubbies, etc) and likes to measure everything concisely.. and here we again see Te’s empiricism and Order. Then we see alongside that, a very jolly humor, playful (Ne) energy and child-like presentation. Lastly we see/hear in her voice a seelie sensitivity, an integrated femininity and a receding of her momentum that isn’t viscous but instead ‘restrained’.

    More than that, however…
    We see in her¬†integration, in the Jungian/psychoanalytical sense. Her TED talk is essentially a story of self-actualization. She is describing to-the-letter what we’d expect from a Te+Si… integrating Fi+Ne. She talks about “control” (Te) and “predict” (Si). Then she talks about learning to let go and be vulnerable. I’m certainly biased but I think she’s a wonderful example of cognitive integration, and a beautiful human being.

    She is a matriarch, she is a grandmother, she is a child… she is a heart… all at once.
    It is so heartening to see that CT is aligning with psychoanalysis, and doing a good job of also paralleling development levels (via vultology) with where a person is in their own spiritual journey. There’s so much to explore here.

    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
    Auburn
    Keymaster
    • Type: TiNe
    • Development: l--l
    • F Attitude: Adaptive

    Faerie: Hey,¬†Auburn. Good job! I was so happy you included Brene! I loooooove her. I thought she was NeFi but then thought she might be Fe because of the Je because I just didnt see Te lead. Lol. Its good to see she was just a different kind of TeSi than I have in my head. I wonder where you would put Martha Beck? You typed her TeSi a long time ago when I asked you. She clearly has lots of Ne restlessness/puer energy and her ego is Fi but I don’t know if I’d put her in the Joy Behar group.

    She’s TeSi l-ll Seelie – Just like Elizabeth Warren!
    As with Warren she feels to me like she “has an NeFi seelie fairy” inside the cognitive architecture of a Te-lead. She’s a life-coach, she’s more than capable, productive, go-getter… and there’s a pattern in Te-lead females to write books, ..but hers are particularly revealing:

    One of the behavioral reasons we know Fi is conscious is because rather than writing books on “How to Be Successful” …or in the case of Barbara Sher “How to Do Everything” …her books focus on self-discovery. Your “north star” is literally your Compass (Ji). All behavioral indicators of conscious Ji can be seen from focus on a nurturing of one’s own inner world, tending to one’s identity, fostering an alignment and contentment with one’s own beliefs/values/self, etc. Like Brene Brown, this is her drama. But she’s got an incredible zest from Ne atop of that, as well as an appreciation for “magic”, “mystery” and “wonder.” She has an active¬†Light Puer Aeternus¬†myth of Wonder as well as an active myth of Edin.

    Like Camile Paglia, she honors the archetypal feminine. And also tending to the body’s emotional needs. Working with the emotional register. It’s easier to see the Te-lead in interviews like this one:

    She’s super seelie in most of her interviews but here ^ we see a little bit of unseelie energy at around 0:20. Gosh she looks like a twin of Paglia in that segment. Very¬†integrity¬†focused response, having a Ji Tower she sits on. Then at 1:12 we start seeing Ne Parodies. A totally different energy she can modulate at will. Te, Fi, Ne definitely there.

    I’ve added her to the l-ll development above, but here also is a comparison of her beside Elizabeth Warren:

    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Auburn.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
© Copyright 2012-2020 | CognitiveType.com
This website's articles, its reading methodology and practices are the intellectual property of J.E. Sandoval.
Animaged GIFs, images and videos belong to their respective owners.