If you experience video loading problems, videos load better on Google Chrome.
This article requires a working understanding of the vultology code.TeSiEDAMERSpoiler:
Up until now the 16 vultologies of the types have still contained far too much variability within them that hasn’t been organized or explained. A percentage of mistypings would slip by especially with borderline cases (like NeFi-Te and TeSi-Ne) and we’ve had no tool or standard to help differentiate these cases. But now we’re moving into a very granular quantification of types based on the level of consciousness of each function — as it’s indeed proven possible to see this vultologically. It’s actually fascinating how well and easy it comes together, and how apparent it is once you see it. This represents the beginning of a new standard for CT, and a methodology that will be used going forward.
Note: These annotations we’ve come up with (l—, ll–, lll-, llll, l–l, l-l-, l-ll, ll-l) have come to mean far more than what I anticipated. This post will thus double as an introduction to the TeSi vultology but also as a more thorough explanation as to what these annotations mean not just for TeSi but for all the types.
I realized watching vids has been a drag up til now, but do watch the videos here as they’ve been completely cleaned up for this occasion. Each is an unbroken 2-3 minutes of footage of only the subject (more details on this later). I also have side-by-sides at the end of some posts so you can see more clearly what the signature looks like. Each development level has a different vultology and you can check any new sample against this list of TeSi’s to see what their development is.
Final Note: These visuals are matched together not only by eight development levels but also by attitude of the F function (seelie/unseelie), the presence or absence of flat affect, and by gender. When all these variables align in the same people (creating a 1 in 1024 match), the two individuals are essentially/automatically twin shades (which helps if they’re also the same age/ethnicity). This new level of resolution will be the standard, which has a maximum number of 4096 when Ego/Subtype is factored in. However, ego is something that can’t be measured vultologically but instead by examining psychology and what people say. To some extent this can be intuited from what they say in these short clips but it’s better addressed through prolonged exposure and study of the person. (more info on this granular system can be found here) This thread will also be updated in the future as more gaps are filled in for all the possible developmental variants of the TeSi.
TeSi l— Unseelie Female / The Self-Empowered (Anti)FeministSpoiler:
TeSi l— Unseelie Male / The Corporate BusinessmanSpoiler:
TeSi l— Seelie Female / The Faux-Fe ManagerSpoiler:
Faerie: Hey, Auburn. Good job! I was so happy you included Brene! I loooooove her. I thought she was NeFi but then thought she might be Fe because of the Je because I just didnt see Te lead. Lol. Its good to see she was just a different kind of TeSi than I have in my head. I wonder where you would put Martha Beck? You typed her TeSi a long time ago when I asked you. She clearly has lots of Ne restlessness/puer energy and her ego is Fi but I don’t know if I’d put her in the Joy Behar group.
She’s TeSi l-ll Seelie – Just like Elizabeth Warren!
As with Warren she feels to me like she “has an NeFi seelie fairy” inside the cognitive architecture of a Te-lead. She’s a life-coach, she’s more than capable, productive, go-getter… and there’s a pattern in Te-lead females to write books, ..but hers are particularly revealing:
One of the behavioral reasons we know Fi is conscious is because rather than writing books on “How to Be Successful” …or in the case of Barbara Sher “How to Do Everything” …her books focus on self-discovery. Your “north star” is literally your Compass (Ji). All behavioral indicators of conscious Ji can be seen from focus on a nurturing of one’s own inner world, tending to one’s identity, fostering an alignment and contentment with one’s own beliefs/values/self, etc. Like Brene Brown, this is her drama. But she’s got an incredible zest from Ne atop of that, as well as an appreciation for “magic”, “mystery” and “wonder.” She has an active Light Puer Aeternus myth of Wonder as well as an active myth of Edin.
Like Camile Paglia, she honors the archetypal feminine. And also tending to the body’s emotional needs. Working with the emotional register. It’s easier to see the Te-lead in interviews like this one:
She’s super seelie in most of her interviews but here ^ we see a little bit of unseelie energy at around 0:20. Gosh she looks like a twin of Paglia in that segment. Very integrity focused response, having a Ji Tower she sits on. Then at 1:12 we start seeing Ne Parodies. A totally different energy she can modulate at will. Te, Fi, Ne definitely there.
I’ve added her to the l-ll development above, but here also is a comparison of her beside Elizabeth Warren:
- This reply was modified 12 months ago by Auburn.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.