Fallen Affect Scale
February 19, 2021

Home Forums General Psychology Fallen Affect Scale

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
  • #25916
    • Type: TiNe
    • Development: l--l
    • Attitude: Adaptive
    I'd like to introduce a new article in the psychodynamics domain-- the Fallen Affect Scale.
    This will be supplanting the previous binary "flat affect" designation with a more nuanced 5-point spectrum. This also means that members who have been given a designation of yes/no might fall somewhere different on this new scale, which has better resolution.
    I'd also like to reiterate that CT does not current have any certified psychologists on board, so this is not medical advice. However, it is the intention that the fallen affect scale be utilized in a psychotherapeutic setting, as I think it can do the most good for humanity there, and I intend to write this into the upcoming practitioner manual for psychodynamics.
    Also, going forward fallen affect will not be publicly featured in a person's profile, since it borders on medical information and members might not want to share that information freely. Your fallen affect score will appear in future vultology report, as a general observation, but it will leave it to you to decide what to do with that information. 🙂
    Copy-paste from article:
    Fallen affect (or Fa) is an emotional signal which is statistically linked to the neuroticism spectrum, or an index of sensitivity to “negative emotion.” The fallen affect scale ranges from 1 to 5, showing the degree of fallen affect within a person's countenance, where 5 is the heaviest amount of falling.

    Visual Description

    Fallen affect is visually defined by a heaviness falling over a person's countenance, affecting every element within it. This downward falling remains a persistent baseline of the face, independent of momentary emotional expressions which may deviate from the mean. More specifically, this falling can be seen in:


    The eyes and brow will appear heavy, causing a weighted appearance that exists independent of Grounded or Suspended vultology, but which stacks atop of it. Qualitatively, the eyes will appear to lack a joyous "spark", and will have a defeated expression. While Grounded or Suspended ocular tension normally consist of one lax and one taut eye area (either the preseptal or pretarsal), fallen affect moves the entire obicularis oculi into a lax direction. Nonetheless, one eye area will still remain more taut relative to the others, which allows us to distinguish Gr vs Su ocular tension, relative to this baseline.


    The mouth will contain a downward pull of the lip corners, causing subtle bulges to form below them and the appearance of a perpetual pout. The cheeks may also be pulled downward by the lip corners, causing them to appear less full and more weighted down.

    Psychology Description

    This signal corresponds to what the Five Factor model calls the neuroticism spectrum, or an index of sensitivity to “negative emotion.” High levels of neuroticism indicates susceptibility to anxiety, depression, bipolar behavior, emotional volatility and the like. Fallen affect is a visual signal that stands outside of the Vultology Code and was discovered by Renee Bayard, and further developed by J.E. Sandoval, as a way to account for anomalies in the psychologies of types. So far it would appear that this signal can accurately identify at least the most severe cases of mental illness and depression. A score of 4 or 5 on the scale is a strong predictor for mental illness. However, the absence of the signal may not discount the possibility of mental illness, but the presence of it very positively suggests it.


    The presence of a strongly fallen affect (4 or 5) indicates an acute psychological reparation process is either pending or underway. One could equate this metaphorically as a journey into the underworld. Individuals with a strong fallen affect are often familiar with the struggles that come with submersion into depression, anxiety and the occult. They will tend to understand the world from a place of familiarity with the darker underside of humanity. They may have a keener understanding than most about what causes pain and suffering, as well as how to rise above it.
    From a psychodynamics perspective, this familiarity with darkness is synonymous with a degree of ego destabilization from having contact with the shadow and possibly from suffering episodes of overtake by it. As such, fallen affect is statistically correlated to the rising of unconscious (shadow) functions into consciousness. There is a positive correlation between the development of the lower two functions and the presence of fallen affect, suggesting that fallen affect may appear as a side-effect of attempted cognitive integration. The conflicts between their functions may not be fully reconciled, causing the struggle of opposites to play out in their own psychology and lead to internal emotional volatility and stress. This fragmentation minimizes as emotional health is restored.


    The diagram above shows a depiction of the fallen affect scale. The image is of Aviv Geffen, who suffers from strong depression and who is a 5/5 on the scale. The image to the far right is the original and the left side images were photo-manipulated to approximate the difference between non-fallen and fallen, for the sake of comparison.

    • Fa-1 (or 1/5) is the lowest possible score on the scale, and corresponds to no fallen affect. Fa-1 individuals will have no additional constriction of their facial muscles.
    • Fa-2 (or 2/5) is the second lowest score on the scale, and corresponds with mild signs of falling, but the individual is still not said to have a fallen affect.
    • Fa-3 (or 3/5) is the middle of the scale, and corresponds with moderate signs of falling. An individual with a 3/5 score is considered to have mild fallen affect.
    • Fa-4 (or 4/5) is on the latter half of the spectrum. An individual with a 4/5 score is considered to have a clear and strong fallen affect.
    • Fa-5 (or 5/5) is on the far end of the spectrum. An individual with a 5/5 score is considered to have a severe fallen affect.

    Therapeutic Use

    The identification of a person's score on this scale can help practitioners to identify where a person may be in their psychological journey and the condition of their mental health. With the aide of psychotherapy, a reduction of fallen affect may be an indicator of integrative success and a reduced cognitive fragmentation. The aim of psychotherapy is therefore to reduce the level of fallen affect present in an individual.

    • Type: TiNe
    • Development: l-l-
    • Attitude: Adaptive

    Makes very much sense.  I'm not sure I have seen it with anxiety though, but maybe Fa-2....
    I hope there at one time will be a similar graduation of all functions/clusters(?),  since it is so apparent that there is a correlation between obvious expressive units and obvious character traits of the person.  Likewise there are those who show only very light vultology signals for fx Te, and they  do not show much proactive rigidity either.  There has been a similar discussion in psychiatry where a diagnosis is usually given due to the numbers of criteria, but some have the opinion that more weight should be given to how strong each criteria manifest (which is also what is looked for in reality, it is just not in the manual.

    • Type: TiNe
    • Development: l--l
    • Attitude: Adaptive

    @sekundaer - yes, totally! I think viewing things by their degrees is much more illuminating than a simple yes/no, and this goes for functions as well. 🙂
    And the new reports (which are just coming online now) will feature this as well, and give a strength number for each function, rather than just a binary conscious/unconscious designation. Well, you'll still be given a consolidated code like "II--" or "I-I-", but if you have any questions about "how far" you were above or below the cutoff point-- that will be visible. 🙂

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
© Copyright 2012-2021 Juan E. Sandoval - Use Policy