Hello,
Here is a first draft of the Model 2 definition of J- (Ji), minus the code: link. Although the finalized code is pending, I hope the computational reasoning is evident to see. This article follows from the previous articles such as the CTA & Objects. I've copy/pasted the main text below:

Computational Effects

The following effects result from the code above playing forward across thousands of cycles, in its registration of objects.

J- Monistic Caliber

The continual application of if (objects[0].properties != mono) { causes an object’s value to be continually assessed, in relation to the mono metric. If we represent this numerically as a decimal between 0 and 1, the J- operation comes to produce an assessment of an object’s mono value as a percentile. This can be thought of as the object’s monistic caliber, or how faithful the object is as a self-existent object. From a phenomenological perspective, this can be experienced as an object’s level of quality, its conceptual perfection, level of truth, or beauty/aesthetics. The qualia of the monistic caliber is similar to the qualia of taste when taste-testing.

J- Non-Procedural Evaluation

The computation of J- is non-procedural. Objects enters through P+‘s Information Gathering and are passed to J- in a spontaneous or disorderly sequence. The operation of J- takes whichever object is presented to it and evaluates it statically, in isolation. This isolated analysis is liberated from linear cause-effect object relationships (J+), or temporal contextualizing (P-). The result of this evaluation is an acute sense of an object’s static placement along a mono spectrum (0-1), but without any necessary adherence to logical or deductive sequences. Thus the answer J- comes to is not the result of deductive conclusions, but from a non-causal measurement of monistic caliber.

J- Gestalt Object Coherence

The continual application of {logosSystem.define(objects[0].properties.properties);} causes the evaluation of an object to run vertically up/down all layers of abstraction that define the object. J- examines the information hierarchy below it when determining its monistic caliber. This causes the root object and its sub-objects to be evaluated by mono as a single object for internal coherence. However, since this coherence is non-procedural, as stated above, coherence is registered not as a deductive conclusion, but as a gestalt conclusion. The sum of the root object and sub-objects is what gives the mono value output, as a value that is the aggregate of the parts.