Computational Vultological Behavioral Mythological
J- Reactive Rigidity Ji – Compass Prince / Princess

Definitional Processing

Definitional Processing (J-) works to describe the boundaries of objects by differentiating objects from one another. The code below is an early draft of what this process entails in its management of objects. The syntax of this code will be refined in the near future, in the creation of a computationally operative cognitive architecture.

function compass() {open_logosSystem;
load_logosSystem.mono;if (data.objects[0].define != mono) {logosSystem.define(objects[0].properties);if (objects[0].properties != mono) {logosSystem.define(objects[0].properties.properties);
}else if (data.objects[0].define == mono) {ignore(objects[0]);}

Code Explanation

Visit this post for an early explanation of the intended meaning behind this code.

Computational Effects

The following effects result from the code above playing forward across thousands of cycles, in its registration of objects.

J- Monistic Caliber

The continual application of if (objects[0].properties != mono) { causes an object’s value to be continually assessed, in relation to the mono metric. If we represent this numerically as a decimal between 0 and 1, the J- operation comes to produce an assessment of an object’s mono value as a percentile. This can be thought of as the object’s monistic caliber, or how faithful the object is as a self-existent object. From a phenomenological perspective, this can be experienced as an object’s level of quality, its conceptual perfection, level of truth, or beauty/aesthetics. The qualia of the monistic caliber is similar to the qualia of taste when taste-testing.

J- Non-Procedural Evaluation

The computation of J- is non-procedural. Objects enters through P+‘s Information Gathering and are passed to J- in a spontaneous or disorderly sequence. The operation of J- takes whichever object is presented to it and evaluates it statically, in isolation. This isolated analysis is liberated from linear cause-effect object relationships (J+), or temporal contextualizing (P-). The result of this evaluation is an acute sense of an object’s static placement along a mono spectrum (0-1), but without any necessary adherence to logical or deductive sequences. Thus the answer J- comes to is not the result of deductive conclusions, but from a non-causal measurement of monistic caliber.

J- Gestalt Object Coherence

The continual application of {logosSystem.define(objects[0].properties.properties);} causes the evaluation of an object to run vertically up/down all layers of abstraction that define the object. J- examines the information hierarchy below it when determining its monistic caliber. This causes the root object and its sub-objects to be evaluated by mono as a single object for internal coherence. However, since this coherence is non-procedural, as stated above, coherence is registered not as a deductive conclusion, but as a gestalt conclusion. The sum of the root object and sub-objects is what gives the mono value output, as a value that is the aggregate of the parts.

For more information please read this thread.

© Copyright 2012-2020 J.E. Sandoval


The content on this site is not
intended for medical advice, diagnosis,
or treatment. Always seek the advice
of your physician or other qualified
health provider with questions you
may have regarding a medical condition.
For more information visit this link.