Hi guys,
I've alluded to the upcoming Profiler a few times, such as in this thread ( https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ct-clarifications-next-steps/ ) and I'm happy to say that the first version of it is currently online right now as an early-release! It's available at: https://cognitivetype.com/profiler/ Feel free to give it a try.

You can find it as a link in the Top Nav here:

Enter in the development of a type, and click "Export Profile." The profiles are downloadable PDFs which stitch together elements from a person's development level and build a custom output. The "How do you relate to this profile?" thread series I've been making were designed for this purpose. I've incorporated much of the feedback provided so far, and also interlaced the 4 functions into the profile.
So far the available types are:

• Ji l---
• Ji ll--
• Pe l---
• Pe ll--
• Pe l-l-
• Pi l---

(When all sections are factored in, it's approximately 1/4th-1/3rd finished. But I believe that the 1/4th that is already complete can be of use now, rather than being held up until all of it is complete.)
This profiler should solve the problem CT developed once it moved to the 1024 resolution, while it lacked profile resources to describe what this all entails. I hope more people will come to agree with their typing now that a profile can be generated which better reflects what CT really means by their visual (and psychological) classification. Still, you'll notice the profiles are described as "Introductions" because at the end of the day, that's all they can be. They're approximately 1.5 pages long and are aimed to serve as an initial explanation of general psychology, but as always the metabolic aspects are where the meat and bones of type really are. And those are listed at the bottom of the profiles too.

Relating Curves:

The solution I found to the pragmatic need for behavioral profiles, in order to talk about type and metabolism with some meaningful reference point, was this. However, these profiles are not isolated in a way where relating to adjacent profiles wouldn't happen. The goal should not be that a person wouldn't relate to any other profile but their own.
In fact, you'll notice that types like the FiSe l--- and TiNe l--- share about 80% of the profile writeup and that's because this is precisely the sort of proportionality that is also true of people's shared cognition in general. Ji l--- types all share some 80% of their psychology with each other, and the remaining ~20% of unshared attributes are related to their specific functions.  Therefore, the kind of goal this profile should strive for, as far as relating to the profiles, should look something like this:
The drop-off rate of relatability should be proportional to the amount of the profile that is tailored towards that person. So an FiSe l--- should still relate some ~70% with Pe profiles, and that's entirely to be expected. It would be more odd if they didn't. The key here is to have the person's actual type be of higher relative resonance than the others. These numbers above are only approximations, for illustration purposes.
I hope that, as the profiler is completed, it can provide compelling writeups that our members here are happy to share with friends and family. As has been noted, the learning curve for CT is still too high, and I hope this can bring that bar down, and present a user-friendly resource that immediately gets to the core of type in a way that can be shown to family and friends with zero introduction to the model. Thank you all for contributing to the evolution of this theory, especially you patreon supporters. You all make this possible.

* * *
* * *

Copyright Notice - You'll notice that I've added a copyright notice to this webpage and also the profiles it generates. This is because a lot of hours of labor have gone into it, and it's material that I also plan to eventually publish in a new CT book which will have all of the updated theory elements. I was originally wondering whether or not this resource (and the profiles) should be something given only as part of a paid reading, but as usual I decided to make it publicly available because I have certain ethics around free information. So I'm happy to share this work publicly with the world, I just ask that these resources not be appropriated by anyone else, either in full or in part. Please also don't modify the profiles outside of this community, although you're absolutely welcome to make threads about proposed modifications or additions to the profiles on this forum.:)
Sorry for all the privacy. Lately it's becoming more important to protect CT's copyright, as it's beginning to enter a more public audience and is climbing out of a long R&D phase. It's very easy for other people to try to scrape off the top of these eight years of R&D work, tweak it here and there and pass it off as their own. I cannot allow that and I have to take measures to prevent that. But overall I still intend to be as open as I can be with CT, to lower the entry bar more and more. I just have to protect the theory in order for it to thrive into where it's ultimately headed.
Thanks so much!