Home 2023 › Forums › Vultology & Learning Center › Vultology Code 2.0 & Attaining Repeatability
Yep, Sander you hit it right on the head! Technical Glitching has been more accurately subdivided into two components:
Thus, Pe Momentum Clamping has been replaced by Body Glitching since that is essentially what it was describing, but having "Pe" in the name was not a good choice / misleading from the start.
The Ti video is coming tomorrow along with a few more. For tonight I have this one to report.
And I’ll answer Bera’s other questions too. 🙂
Here's the Ti video:
Thanks for explaining where Ti's stuttering comes from. Frustration to be more precise.
Hence, regular stuttering seen in Fi users must come from their Te instead (like projecting hands that grasp).
Keep up the good work!
Keep up the good work!
Thanks Sander!
Will try my best.
Today I have the Fe video for you guys:
(I may end up redoing these next ones after the weekend, cuz I feel like I'm rushing too much but...)
Here are three more functions:
I'll aim to have the final two by tomorrow (Friday), cutting it a bit close. But even if I don't get the final tutorials done I'll go ahead with the test since all the signals are still technically present. 🙂
These are great! Very helpful. Just finished watching the Te one. I think I do a sassy head-bobble delivery that isn’t combined into a head shake in this excerpt, so if it counts you can add it to the codifier without audio https://youtu.be/net8eKJTN98
And finally the last one for this series:
It's really quite shocking to me how I couldn't get this video down below 26 minutes even though I tried to be very concise. This tutorial series is compressed to the max, and yet it's 2:30 hours of break-less signal bombardment. I guess as a field of study, it really is just that involved.
If it's decompressed I'm sure it could amount to a two week course! ![]()
(p.s. - Also, I think what I'll do is add links to these videos inside the codifier too, so you can reference them right there if more info is needed.)
Just want to say a big thank you for all this work. Its all rather intuitive IMO and seems to confirm most of the friends I’ve typed(using a 3D system of MBTI screening, function analysis and antagonism, and stereotypes). Of course traditional typing requires a huge amount of deductive reasoning and cross checking that is not for the feint of heart and can still struggle with insufficient data points and subjectivity.
Cheers!
.
.
.
