Ms.Quanta NiTe subjective experience

[Juan E. Sandoval]

Putting this here for reference, with her permission: Ms.Quanta's subjective experience of Ni

---

Ms.Quanta — Today at 2:32 PM

So, I did observe my vultology from my childhood videos and some other rare and recent instances where I had to record myself. And that was one way. For the more psychological aspect of it, I related to the descriptions on the CT site. I'm always trying to put things into a context by relating concepts, and this process is not proactively done as it is with Ne. It's like inside my head there's a vortex of consciousness. But it's like Cosmic background radiation. There's so much information that it's very hard to funnel it down. Just last night, I was attempting to explain Ni to a friend, and while typing the answer it just vomited out of me. I did not start writing with the expectation to compare my brain to a washing machine, but I knew I had been thinking about what Ni was for quite a few days and wasnt able to express it. I think an apt comparison for that would be the washing machine while in progress. There's a lot of swirling concepts, but they're being processed, and it's very hard to grasp at anything during that phase. I am not fully aware of the processing. All that time my more conscious self will just try to speculate and tinker, and that is moderately useful. After that processing has happened, I need to put my consciousness into that more settled, static vortex and look for the concept which is mostly effortless. You just think about something and try to harness it into thoughts, and it'll happen. So when I catch that concept I'm looking for, along with it, it'll tug along a bunch of other concepts. Because they are entangled. They were related. And it's still a lot of information, which I'll have to distill. That's where the Te kicks in. It organises and compartmentalises the information. Sometimes two things go into the same box, sometimes not. Once that is done, I feel very satisfied with my work. The kind is satisfaction one feels after tidying up the room. And then I can just look at the beauty of it, and scan for any flaws (Ji, ig).

Over the years, I have associated unlikely things together. I was reading about the redshifting in the universe, some years ago. And we were studying electromagnetism at the time, in school. A science exhibition propped up, and I decided to participate. I didn't even have to scout for ideas, it was already there in my head. Using an electromagnet as a metaphor to explain redshifting (considering the frequency of the number of turns of the solenoid as light, and the varying strength of the electromagnet acting as a good visual as to how things get farther apart). It was a nice representation

[Elsie]

sounds familiar
tho i have used "factory" vs washing-machine (the washing-machine i could possibly understand is "stream,converging river")
[factory because] for the items are smaller and more precise, i refer to the objects in that factory as cubes (or objects), as they are most often cues but may also be other shapes (sphere,pyramid),

static-vortex of compartmentalized objects seem to appear much faster (if-not begun at - re:ideas already there) , already settled blackness with items inside (they are often relocated to "workspace")
and then the items are moved/set into motion, having certain ways (opportunities) of moving only (anchors)
objects are highlighted and cannot be strung-along unless fixed together (action), building a device/shape,
a single object with no other connections is most fascinating as it operate more like an ever folding/opening (inward) rubix
connected ones do not do this because i do not zoom into them (already have)

this sorta re to @safsom ,who is not mentioned in this topic so far: remembering: Se and asshole-level cut/dry distinctions between objects/concepts, if u are still working on that theory

as for connected devices...this means when "the tablecloth is pulled" (dump a concept) all may be disposed neatly (they can also be worked on "in the void" separately), even very large ones - new,old,doesnt matter
i encourage this way of processing because it is very fast and u can trash all the ways through stuff that don't matter or doesn't-work, stripping it,and therefore tunnelling to/through the fastest point (most obvious point).
other helps:
. a tree is seen with no branches
. xray,lenses
. legos,which are different from pin/tacs+string (instead: cubes have rigid connectors/pipes which cannot deviate in tension/length)

"ideas already there" might be why its possible to "explain something to anybody [lvl]" (they have "ideas already there" too)

this post will make more sense referencing my previous posts discussing (primarily my own) experiences of [own] mind where i have gone more into detail/visual on how i think it works

[Author]

Posts