Anthony Hopkins' type

Home Forums Vultology & Learning Center Anthony Hopkins' type

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #21327
    Wolf00
    Participant
    • Type: SeFi
    • Development: lll-
    • Attitude: Unseelie

    I attempted to type Hopkins 2 weeks ago and I have a different view right now + a better understanding of vultology (which is not that good yet).
    I got him briefly as Fe/Ti because I was probably confused by the perception dominance fluidity in motion.
    (giphy.com is not behaving atm for some reason, so I have to use another platform)
    The video:

    https://imgflip.com/gif/4arizd
    ^eye head parallel motions
    His zone outs look Ni as well, so the Ni/Se is well established imo.
    https://imgflip.com/gif/4arj4h
    ^he's displaying Fi breaking through cheeks here
    https://imgflip.com/gif/4arjkz - 2:38 - 2:43
    ^he's doing 2 pronounced body sways here
    https://imgflip.com/gif/4arjrs
    ^followed by another strong sway at 2:47
    https://imgflip.com/gif/4arkp1
    ^another strong Pe sway
    I've only seen these kinds of sways in Pe dominants. They're probably not enough to demonstrate Pe dominance, but maybe I can find more.
    His eye centricity and fluidity remain fairly clear to me, as shown in the below GIFs for example:
    https://imgflip.com/gif/4arkax
    and
    https://imgflip.com/gif/4arkhk
    I think it's solid to say that Hopkins is polarized gamma P lead, but his strong swaying suggests Pe being higher in the hierarchy. He also has a subtle playful nature to him, if I'm seeing it right.
    So, SeFi with conscious Pi. Idk about the other functions.

    #22979
    Ninth
    Participant
    • Type: TiSe
    • Development: l--l
    • Attitude: Directive

    First reaction: P-lead; Pi-lead. I then found myself checking the speed and it was set to normal. Second reaction: WTF?
    I agree with you on Pe higher in the hierarchy; not so much for the sways, for me it's about the speed and the sudden gesticulation. I suspect a Je dev but I  wouldn't say the same about more recent videos.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
A forum exploring the connection between Jungian typology and body mannerisms.

Social Media

© Copyright 2012-2021 Juan E. Sandoval - Use Policy
searchhomecommentsenvelopegraduation-hatbookearth linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram