Really cool Auburn! Is there anyway we can work in teams? After you've singled us out.

Pretty sure she has Ne/Si but no idea about her judging axis.
Ne-10: Brushstroke Eye Movements:
https://gfycat.com/smoggyscaredilsamochadegu
Ne-7: Spritely Energy
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/307960171051614208/603705768134311947/ElectricFloweryBrocketdeer-size_restricted.gif?width=400&height=226

@auburn - hehehe, yes, the juicy tedium of vultology is in the details. As with any subject that actually possesses merit, overcoming plateaus in skill/understanding requires devoting significant amounts of time to repetition and dissection of those repetitions. I have always found the psychological aspects of CT the far more interesting side of the coin, and find my interest in vultology has always been in service to that other side. But again, as with most anything in life, the best results come from a pure desire towards something. The drive for betterment in a subject should be done from an unadulterated desire for mastery in that skill set, rather than what that skill set could be in service to something else. My own flagging desire to invest those repetitions and dissections into vultology comes as my commitment to other self-chosen time-sinks has never been stronger.
Question: Can I assume that the "answers"/supporting argumentation submitted for the actual quiz will be private rather than public?

Was on a trip. Catching up with this.
I'll give it a try.
Saw the Fi/Te signals + Ne/Si signals (mostly Ne).
Lots of sways, toggles, bubbling momentum, naive eyes… Pe is likely her basis. I don’t think she’s a J type (J seems to interrupt P).
She has a rigidity added by two J functions developed, I believe.
Saw lots of Ji signals + Fi signals.
Even if her arms don’t move that much (but they do move forward and the gestures seem firm enough), there are lots of head nods and head shakes, shrugs and an overall added forwardness to the Pe core.
Therefore, I’d say dev. III-.
My full guess: NeFi / dev. III-.
Edit: Hmmm… Watched her vids more carefully, and I think i’ve mistaken Pi eye-drifts for Ji disengaging eyes… She also displays a great deal of conductor energy… Seems to have weighted movements… Not so much meticulousness and receding energy, but Pi narcotization… She’s not as angular as other Pe(JJ)s, not as nervous and stuttering either…
So, I’m changing her dev. to NeFi / I-II / unseelie...

@septimus

She has a rigidity added by two J functions developed, I believe.

Yes, this makes sense. It could be the reason why I see her as being too rigid to be NeFi. I could see her being NeFi in the older videos, which would actually indicate she is an NeFi who developed Te and Fi later on.
Another argument for NeFi is that I watched a lot of videos of her yesterday and despite her rigidity, I think most of her hand movements are casual.
Arguments against NeFi and for FiNe are :
- there are (indeed short -like 2 minutes) videos in which she is rigid almost permanently from start till end which I wouldn't expect from an Ne lead (but I can modulate and be rigid for minutes so this is not impossible and she might want to look poised simply because of her work; I think she could be an admirer of actresses like Audrey Hepburn and she might unconsciously or even consciously choose to express that certain style, you know?);
- The NeFi III- on the site still look more bubbly, energetic and full of enthusiasm. I can't really make a very articulate point, but looking at Linda Liukas...she is almost constantly softly swaying, constantly in an alert state, she goes in perk up after perk up.
https://cognitivetype.net/s/NeFi_Linda_Liukas_1.mp4?_=1
And I don't see this in Juliette Binoche's case. Now I also don't see that great of an overlap with the FiNe II-I on the site...but I think she is closer to them. Closer to Susan Cain than to Linda Liukas. But I might be wrong.
On a more fun note :

Very accurate way of describing her. :)))
I would also love to see more opinions because now it looks like most of us think she is a delta reviser but there are also other views about her type.

 lots of what i thought were disengagements, after a second look seem to be eye drifts

I wondered about this exact same thing. 🙂 She usually does not freeze and look down but she either looks down and to the side or up and to the side. My line of thinking was...well if she is rigid and is looking down and to the side, this is a Ji disengaging signal. But could it be Je rigidness and Pi eye drift and a Pi inertia slowing her down? I really don't know and I am really curious if this is what is happening.
Also we don't have any NeFi I-II's to compare her too and this might be exactly why some of us said, oh she does not look like any of the NeFi dev levels on the site.
This would also explain the idea some people had that she is TeSi, as well as the idea that she is SiFe. 🙂 She also made me think of tea at some point.
So - she does this pretty often :

So, she looks up and to the side, thinks and then does a Pe like sway with some hand movements -that I don't see here but I figure they might be Je, she seems to have a hit.

And here she does the Ne toggles but in the middle of them I think she has a moment when she has a fixed gaze.

Here too. A fixed gaze moment followed by Ne toggling, no?
I think you are right ! It makes a lot of sense anyway ! Si might be slowing her down and then our thoughts are - she has this warmth...where does it come from? Also why isn't she more energetic and bubbly if she is NeFi? Something doesn't add up.  And we reach one of the following conclusions :
- she is actually an Fe user ;
- she is delta, so it must be Fi, so maybe she is FiNe or maybe she is NeFi II--. She can't possibly be NeTe or TeNe and this soft, right? So, ok, let's go with Fi. :))
And actually she might just be slowed down by Si ! And this would explain how some of what I said in the first post would be wrong. Maybe it's not wounded expression, maybe it's just Si. Maybe her shoulders don't fall in an Fi radiation way, maybe she just does a shoulder shrug that is affected somewhat by Pi inertia. Which is anyway something I usually fail to see.
If you are right - and I think you are - there are so many lessons to draw out of this ! I think the most important one is to go from the roots up, not from branch to branch. Because I kept comparing her to different people on the site. Instead of looking more closely to the underlying issue. Like counting the signals of each function. 🙂