FeSi Profiles
FeNi Profiles
TeNi Profiles
TeSi Profiles
NeTi Profiles
SeTi Profiles
SeFi Profiles
NeFi Profiles
TiNe Profiles
TiSe Profiles
FiSe Profiles
FiNe Profiles
SiFe Profiles
NiFe Profiles
NiTe Profiles
SiTe Profiles
Reply To: M+ (Ne) Computation

Home 2023 Forums Model 2 Discussions M+ (Ne) Computation Reply To: M+ (Ne) Computation

#26178
Lautrec
Participant
  • Type: TiNe
  • Development: l---
  • Attitude: Adaptive

Is there a formally defined syntax for the CTA pseudocode? I think its readability could be enhanced by replacing the current concoction of camelCase and kebab-case with snake_case. Concerning kebab-case specifically, most compilers I've worked with interpret 'x-y' as a mathematical operation containing two distinct variables and not as a single variable name.

bookmarkglobeenvelopeshopping-bag