Home 2023 › Forums › General Psychology › Jordan Peterson & Controversies › Reply To: Jordan Peterson & Controversies
I don't quite have enough information to agree or disagree with Cedar. But, she has given some interesting insights. I'm not really sure if having a chill conversation with everybody is possible, but I'd like to keep trying just see if I can. I'd like to come off as someone who's trying to understand instead of someone who is trying one up, but I have no reason believe that is ever going to happen with everybody. All in all no big deal I won't stop 'being me' around anybody and everybody at all times.
Reading this article has shed light on some interesting things on Jordan I didn't know about. Although the author Nellie Bowles is a delta who's observing a beta, which is likely the most 'knew you'd push back' kind of thing all day, if anything else. Not to play victim but lot in this read really does seem to me like her Ne is betting up on his Ni. From a Beta stand point the mythologies are workable when you consider applying them to the grand scale of things that happen in life. Although the way the author pointed out the mythologies I see her readers perceiving them as something insane. Jordan also believes in things that I straight up don't agree with. If I take the good with the bad from ALL the content I've seen so far then I can't rule out JP as a relative net positive for the world in general.
PS: Part 2 addon to the article > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjemMA2K_6A
PPS: Does anyone think Ti deals with things in everyday life in a top down matter as, opposed to bottom up which might be Te?
.
.
.
