Reply To: Functional Stack, levels of development and function descriptions

[LadyNerdsky]

PART TWO: DEVELOPMENT LEVELS
E-leads (N=35, 50% of the database, with 88% of E-leads being Pe)
I-leads (N=35, 50% of the database, with 62% of I-leads being Ji)
 
Overall development levels:
I--- N= 27(38.6%)
II-- N= 16 (22.9%)
III- N= 9 (12.9%)
IIII N= 1 (1.4%)
I-I- N= 6 (8.6%)
I--I N= 4 (5.7%)
II-I N= 5 (7.1%)
I-II N= 2 (2.9%)
Most people have their lead-function conscious only, followed by lead and auxiliary being conscious.
NB. Sample sizes are far too small for the other development levels, but I looked at basic trends within these groups anyway.
 
Development I--- (N=27 total)
E-leads N = 15 (55.6% of development I---)
I-leads N= 12 (44% of development I---)
Roughly equal number of E and I leads in Development I-
Slightly more E-leads found in development I--- (55.6%) than present overall in the database (50%)
Slightly less I-leads found in development I--- (44%) than present overall in the database (50%).
But this might not be statistically significant.
Although 58.1% of Pe-leads in the whole database are Ne-lead, Ne-leads are overrepresented in I--- development, making-up 73% of the extraverted development I--- level. More Se-leads seem to have moved beyond this level.
Numbers are too low to compare Je (Te vs Fe), but it’s worth noting that none are in Dev I---
Heartitude: 15 of 27 have “Dark” orientation (55%, roughly in line with overall database)
Gender: 14 of 27 are women (roughly equal)
Flat Affect: 1 of 27 has Flat Affect (3.7%, underrepresented given overall prevalence rate of 14.3%).
Are introverts more likely to develop beyond I--- than extroverts? 
Are Se-leads more likely to develop beyond stage I--- compared to Ne-leads?
Are those with Flat Affect more likely to be found in the less common development levels?
 
Development II- (E+I, or I+E, N= 16 total)
E-lead, N= 5 (31.3% of development II--)
I-lead, N= 11 (68.8% of development II--), All 11 were Ji-lead.
Introvert leads are overrepresented in development II-- (68.8% I vs 31.3% E) given that there’s an equal number of extrovert and introvert leads in the database overall.
Introverts seem more likely to develop a conscious E-function than extroverts are to develop a conscious I-function.
Ji-leads are overrepresented in development II-- given their overall prevalence in the database (31.4%), compared to Pi-leads (18.6%).
Not enough Je-leads in the database overall to comment on Pe vs Je, but worth noting that none are in Dev II-- either.
Most II-- development are Seelie/Adaptive
Heartitude: 3 of 16 have “Dark” orientation (18.8%, underrepresented given overall prevalence rate)
Gender: 11 of 16 are women (slightly overrepresented)
Flat Affect: 2 of 16 have Flat Affect (12.5%, roughly in-line with overall prevalence rate).
Why are introvert-leads more likely to develop a conscious extraverted function compared to extrovert-leads?
Why are Ji-leads (who are mostly Seelie/Adaptive in II--) more likely to develop a second conscious function that’s extroverted and auxiliary than Pi-leads (who develop double-introvert or develop the polarity, more on that below)
 
Development I-I- (E+E, or I+I, N=6 total)**
E-lead, N=3
I-lead, N=3
** Sample size far too small. Interesting that there’s an equal number of double introvert and double extravert development. But they’re vastly outnumbered by II-development.
All three double-introverts are Pi-leads. FWIW the other three double-extraverts are Se-lead, Te-lead and Ne-lead.
Heartitude: 4 of 6 have “Dark” orientation (66% of I-I-, overrepresented given overall prevalence rate of 14.3%)
Gender: 2 of 6 are women
Flat Affect: 2 of 6 have Flat Affect (33% of I-I-, overrepresented given overall prevalence rate of 14.3%, one E-lead, one I-lead).
Why are individuals with Flat Affect more likely to have I-I- development above I--- or II--?
Is there something about a “dark” orientation that pushes I-I- development above II-- (given that most II-- dev above are Seelie/Adaptive?)
 
Development III- (EIE, or IEI, N=9 total)**
E-lead, N=7
I-lead, N=2
** Sample size is small. Seems that most with III- development are extrovert-leads (either Se or Ne equally), with Seelie/Adaptive double-extrovert (5 of 7) more likely than double introvert.
Both of the IEI developments are Pi-leads (Ni), and both are unseelie, one with Flat Affect.
Not enough Je-leads in the database overall to comment on Pe vs Je, but worth noting that none are in Dev III-- either.
Heartitude: 4 of 9 have “Dark” orientation (in-line with overall prevalence rate)
Gender: 5 of 9 are women (roughly equal)
Flat Affect: 1 of 9 (11% of Dev III-, present in the Pi-lead)
Again, the unseelie Pi-leads (with and without Flat Affect) are overrepresented in having double-introvert functions (like the I-I- individuals above). Why?
 
Development I--I (Polarised I+E, or E+I, N=4 total)**
E-lead, N= 3 (Se, Fe, Te)
I-lead, N=1 (Si)
** Small sample size. The Je-leads finally make an appearance, with 2 of the 4 Je-leads in the database having I--I development. No Ji-leads appear.
Heartitude: split 50/50
Gender: Split 50/50
Flat Affect: 2 of 4 (50% of I--I, highly overrepresented given 14.3% general prevalence in the overall database. One Si-lead, one Te-lead)
 
Development II-I (I+E+E, E+I+I, N= 5 total)**
E-lead, N= 0
I-lead, N= 5
** Small sample size. So far, no extrovert leads have developed double-introvert functions.
4 of 5 introverts who developed double extroverted functions are Ji+Pe, with all 4 being Ti-lead, 4 being “dark” heartitude and 3 of the 4 being Ne-aux. The remaining introvert is Si-Te.
Heartitude: 4 of 5 have “dark” orientation (overrepresented)
Gender: 4 of 5 are women (small sample, but trending towards overrepresented).
Flat Affect: 0 of 5.
___________________
The other development levels consist of 1 or 2 people.
There are only two I-II development individuals, and both males have “dark” orientation with Flat Affect (SiTe, FeSi). One IIII development, SeFi, seelie male.