Home 2023 › Forums › The General Hall › Proposal for a System of Collective Intelligence for Vultological Typing › Reply To: Proposal for a System of Collective Intelligence for Vultological Typing
You could even get statistically significant data from this method. For example, the probability of the conductor/reviser dichotomy is .5 at chance, so if 6 people agree on someone’s conductor reviser dichotomy there’s a .03125 probability of that happening randomly which would be less than the .05 value that is commonly used as the criteria for statistical significance in most studies.
.
.
.
