Yes I'm seeing FeSi (lll- or llll) too. He looks slightly more like a Directive Tom Hiddleston than Alain De Botton, but is somewhere right in there.
lll- development would make sense for him psychologically, as a connoisseur. P-heaviness is associated with artistry and crafts. I don't know much about whiskey but I know that in general the alcohol domain is filled with sensory impressions, hues, colors, smells -- all of which are archived into memory. He seems heavy on the Si indexal quality (re: memory archive) and is an Ne tinkerer/blender/mixer/innovator.
edit:
This guy caught my attention so I just kept going. I compared him side-to-side with Hiddleston and De Botton, and I'm fairly sure FeSi lll- is right. He has these moments of Ti for sure, which I think @septimus-chalier you picked up on. But he lacks the full rigidity provided by having a fully conscious polarized-J axis, which has this constrained mechanical quality. Instead he has the P-heavy duality with wide open body sways and abounding head tilts.
Er... here's the video I came up with:

I think he might be moving from lll- to llll, while Alain De Botton likely moved from l--l to llll. @faeruss and I have talked about how the pathway of development one travels in life leaves a marker. As an lll- type moving into llll, he's using Ti to increase the finesse of his Si connoisseur-ship and Ne experimenting/dabbling.
By contrast, the l--l pathway is political, axiomatic and idealistic... and then moves into social narratives (Si) and human-theory-tinkering (Ne) in relation to axioms and politics, as we see with De Botton. So De Botton is a connoisseur of history, language, philosophy, etc. This appears to also map onto the vultology differences we see. I'm inflating this with specifics now, and this post is totally more time than I intended to invest, but.. in for a penny, in for a pound!

(Sorry for the TL;DR guys.)