Love this! Super helpful and I’m so grateful you made this!

I’m starting to think your first assessment about me was right, @auburn. At first glance when I compare the FiSe and FiNe pictures the FiSe stands out as looking almost exactly like me overall. HOWEVER, when I really examine closely at small details (something I struggle with) I not…Read more

Saw this, and I thought of this poem and you (Auburn).

@Tea, I must say it is comforting to read about experience of "architectural flexibility" from another PeJi l--l.

I had read that last segment, about SeTi, a few time more than the ones above. All of that is fairly accurate. I don't know if I can speak for most SeTi; I like choosing the singular course that seems to be hidden from what's within…Read more

Epic, I think you've made an important distinction between conductors and revisors. It's said that Ne looks at many theories while Ni sticks to one and continues to doubt it. But I think we can apply that to Pe v Pi as well.

I very much resonate with your approach. I take the important principles from theories and shape mine. I think I would…Read more

Auburn:    What I wondered was if e.g. TiNe I-I-  is the same as TiNe-Si ?
I have seen in the old forum that some members are typed as say FeNi-Se,I-II  which indicates that it might not be the same. and I wonder if this should be read as conscious Se and Ti PLUS dominated more by Se than Ni?
Before I discovered CT I looked into Dave Powers who…Read more

Too awesome! I feel like I fall into a "vector of desire" many times before I develop a theory or an analogy.