@sekundaer

It seem like Auburn cleared up the really important stuff pretty well especially TiNe l-l-. However, you may still be in the air about TiNe-Si. Lucky for you I have a fascination for the ego-fixation, which maybe unhealthy. So if you wish you can had over here...…Read more

Hey, these were the least uncanny of the bunch!

I put double the time into these, to make sure they're representative of the type. :3

Perhaps someday we’ll have an index of actual samples a la what Socionics attempted to do!..

Do u wanna gather celebrity faces again?

Maybe your getting to realize it for myself, but to be honest with you a lot of this depended on context from the last forum. I suspect that I have gotten narrow minded and took out too small of a segment from fae's reply. I so then my mistake @fae.

With that covered... I think there is still something to savage from this would be shipwreck. I'll…Read more

Cool! I’ve always wanted to be a lab rat 😎👍🏼

There has been some open debate as to what the nature of hierarchy is. But as far as I can tell, Ti-Ne-Si-Fe is actually correct for the TiNe in all cases. In other words, there appears to be a significance in the categories:

• Primary
• Auxiliary
• Tertiary
• Polar

Where the position of the auxiliary is always what it is, whether or not a…Read more

I think I like where you're going with this.

But how would you define: Reason, Application, Meaning/Truth?

I'm not sure we all implicitly come with the same definition of the terms.