Hi. I agree , it could be this way, however this can give another assumption : if a Se Type can't have Ne in his/her stack, and the other way around,  then we can't see Ne-like imagination for Se Type, if we prove that this is the case then we're fine,  otherwise how can we explain that a Se Type can have Ne imagination? 🙂

Can we define Enneagram as scientific? If yes in what way or, if not, how we can compare a non-scientific Model (Enneagram) to a Model that is pointing to science(CT)?

Imho it's merely a matter of definition differences.  That is, if I define Extraversion as X and someone else defines it as Y, then it's obvious that for me is wrong who is using the Y definition.

Also, to give another example,  there are overlaps in CT Type behavior,  I can fit my Type behavior partially and completely different Type behavior to…Read more

Hi @Lapis Lazuli. You can see Fe/Ti signals GIFs on the vultology.com website , Tools/Codifier, you have to be registered to access to it.

Otherwise those signals are available on the Cognitive book, in ebook or paper format,  or on the YouTube official channel.

👋🏼👋🏼

@Lucas yes it makes sense, A person can be assertive if they choose to wield it like a sword, but they can also choose to sheathe the sword and not use it. This may relate to the myth of the King who is peaceful and non-violent, but will take action when needed.

Yes I don't think its scientific, I just want to find a correlation or synchronicity with archetypal imagery.

I can't remember exactly the Te definition,  however if we assume that it's referring to be assertive and facts vs. feelings,  then I think that, as all the functions, the best result is to have a balance and to achieve to a balance it's inevitable to make some mistake in one sense or the other.

I mean, someone can read or copy one's own wake f…Read more