<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cognitive Typology | Hrafn | Activity</title>
	<link>https://cognitivetype.com/members/hrafn/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cognitivetype.com/members/hrafn/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Hrafn.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 23:12:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0453fc65cab677ab7b51c4a5dc25a7a8</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Internal Conflict in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/deltas-internal-conflict/#post-31302</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 06:28:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, for whatever it’s worth I just wanna say I’m not a huge fan of the term “bureaucrat.” There’s the fact that it’s quite unflattering (not that meritocrat or sectarian are all that much better, lol).</p>
<p>But more importantly, I just don’t feel that bureaucrat is the most vivid or descriptive term for the Conductor Delta functions. I&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10667"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/deltas-internal-conflict/#post-31302" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5d63161ebdbf2403b7a5955abbd9c87c</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic CT types vs. temperament in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ct-types-vs-temperament/#post-30358</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2021 05:38:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ETA: Just wanted to clarify that I don't think CT and MBTI have no relationship to each other whatsoever (and clearly you don't either based on your original post). I do think that CT/cognition informs MBTI/temperament, but they are not the same thing and you cannot predict one from the other with 100% accuracy.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/fayest42/' rel="nofollow ugc">@fayest42</a>, yes I agree. I suspect&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-9631"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ct-types-vs-temperament/#post-30358" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0711d940924c43ca8ca70b24c0175461</guid>
				<title>Hrafn started the topic CT types vs. temperament in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ct-types-vs-temperament/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 05:21:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than believing people are routinely mistyping themselves in the MBTI system, I’ve begun to believe that the two systems are measuring two different things. If CT is measuring cognitive differences, the MBTI is attempting to gauge temperament**—the patterns of behavioral &amp; dispositional traits a person displays outwardly.</p>
<p>All this to say,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-9470"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ct-types-vs-temperament/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">46b18ba4127143e252c89b42a34c0347</guid>
				<title>Hrafn started the topic A few questions about attitudes of the heart in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/a-few-questions-about-attitudes-of-the-heart/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 06:01:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Evaluating heartude</strong></p>
<p>I'm curious about whether are any defined methods or criteria for evaluating whether a person has a light or dark heartude. Is it just a matter of their overall energy or feel, or is there something more explicit that I've missed?</p>
<p>Similarly, Auburn, a while back you mentioned that you’d recently recognized that a person c&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-9180"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/a-few-questions-about-attitudes-of-the-heart/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">20de93db19b3c9afe3489de750173e92</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Sub-Primary Functions and IN in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/sub-primary-functions/#post-30080</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2021 05:08:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your way of describing your Pi lapis lazuli. I’m not sure if I see a big difference between what I called gaps and you called very blurry areas. If I think of my worldview as an unbroken whole with some out-of-focus areas, I would still tend to think of IN as bootstrapping off of adjacent in-focus areas to provide sort of artificial, s&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-9034"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/sub-primary-functions/#post-30080" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1bacd2159e35cebbb29a15aabed74d18</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Sub-Primary Functions and IN in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/sub-primary-functions/#post-30048</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 07:36:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This IN idea—aggregated thematic chains seems to make sense to me.</p>
<p>I’d also tend to assume that IN is involved with things like thinking in analogies, cross-contextualization &amp; induction. I’ve thought of it as forming associations between larger datasets that have similar features or are impressionistically similar, no? Also as what I use to fi&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-9023"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/sub-primary-functions/#post-30048" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9df0609cf22feb51154a583c9a13b812</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Future Timeline? in the forum Politics &#038; Current Events</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/future-timeline/#post-30037</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:38:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“We live in capitalism. Its power seems inescapable. So did the divine right of kings. Any human power can be resisted and changed by human beings.” –Ursula LeGuin</p></blockquote>
<p>So I’ve been wanting to respond to this topic for quite a while, and I briefly outlined some of my thoughts in that video I sent <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@auburn</a>. Admittedly, I don’t have much knowledge&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-9021"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/future-timeline/#post-30037" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d4cc0d4b81e4cb6c8b276173c350053b</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Discord Importer in the forum Official &#038; Introductions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/discord-importer/#post-30020</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 01:44:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like it could be great way to add new content. I hope it’s prolific and that people will be willing to participate. In addition to the “archival” benefits of having stuff posted here, this also helps folks like myself who haven’t wanted to jump into the whole Discord thing.</p>
<p>Perhaps content-generation through this means will engage&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-9006"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/discord-importer/#post-30020" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fcdf0d0a38c2a9ea898c69ddd68ef825</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Who would you be as a fictional character? in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/who-would-you-be-as-a-fictional-character/#post-29933</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 07:32:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, when I read the prompt for this topic I interpreted it something like, “which fictional character most embodies who you actually are?,” rather than “which fictional character would you like to be?” I thought about it and thought about it, but I have an inside view of my own complexities, so it’s difficult to find any character that actually&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8950"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/who-would-you-be-as-a-fictional-character/#post-29933" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dacfba8cf8e39c29d644ab3136d3be6d</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Part 3 in the forum Members</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/what-ive-learned-after-being-mistyped-for-four-years/#post-26569</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2021 02:46:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m curious to hear from anyone else who has been mistyped--or whose type has changed over time--within the CT system:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>What did you type as before? What do you type as now?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Do you feel satisfied that you’ve arrived at your ‘true type’? What was the process of finding it like?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Are there specific ways that your personal growth has bee&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8474"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/what-ive-learned-after-being-mistyped-for-four-years/#post-26569" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">49b291c5896c798e525d547dfed46767</guid>
				<title>Hrafn started the topic Part 3 in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/what-ive-learned-after-being-mistyped-for-four-years/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2021 01:43:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Auburn</a>, I was originally going to write this as a message to you, but I feel that much of my feedback concerns the community as a whole, so I’ve decided to write it as a post, instead (hope you don't mind). It’s gotten a bit tl;dr, but I hope someone will read it.</p>
<p>I was recently retyped as SiTe after four years of being considered SiFe. I kno&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8473"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/what-ive-learned-after-being-mistyped-for-four-years/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">527a41db8ac717b99c65c39116c14f27</guid>
				<title>Hrafn&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/8468/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 05:14:23 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cb2ccf81563afab8599f688250dbb725</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Forum Links in the forum Members</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/eric-berne/#post-26552</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2021 05:23:01 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just glanced at it quickly so take this with a heavy dose of salt. His energy looked Pi to me, he seemed inertial and eye-centric. I didn’t get a clear sense of lightweight inertia (Si) vs grounded inertia (Ni) just from the bits I watched, but the static appearance of his eyes was much more Si. So my guess is Si-lead, perhaps SiFe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8a261df1b8f54b56eaf5697be31bbfc9</guid>
				<title>Hrafn&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/8426/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 17:39:07 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9dfc5e6df8cde3b3ef715676942ed8fa</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic New Articles Thread in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/new-articles-thread/#post-26532</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 15:41:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Auburn</a>, I'm enjoying seeing these progress. I have a few quick thoughts  on some of them.</p>
<blockquote><p>Previously, a person was either classed as “seelie” or “unseelie, or as “adaptive” or “directive”, as if one could not be strong in both at once, or weak in both at once. But this has proven to be not how the vultology and psychology manifests in p&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8419"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/new-articles-thread/#post-26532" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0c1c3717999185282afca1c62fc6d32e</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Culture, health &#038; Iain McGilchrist&#039;s ideas about brain lateralization in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/culture-health-iain-mcgilchrists-ideas-about-brain-lateralization/#post-26466</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 04:20:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/rua/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Rua</a></p>
<blockquote><p>I believe that the influence of culture is very difficult to overstate when it comes to human interactions; many large engines of modern culture feel grossly imbalanced/inhumane to me, and I’m interested to hear McGilchrist’s perspective. I wonder about the criteria for cultural course correction, i.e. the emergence of sig&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8354"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/culture-health-iain-mcgilchrists-ideas-about-brain-lateralization/#post-26466" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f385b52623bcd2b47e998ffa8ae5dc3b</guid>
				<title>Hrafn started the topic Culture, health &#038; Iain McGilchrist&#039;s ideas about brain lateralization in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/culture-health-iain-mcgilchrists-ideas-about-brain-lateralization/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2021 15:17:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a speculative idea about what Iain McGilchrist's ideas on brain lateralization might imply for individual health and personal development within western and/or global culture, broadly speaking.</p>
<p>In <em>The Master and His Emissary</em>, McGilchrist explains that the two hemispheres of the brain have broadly different agendas. While the right&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8336"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/culture-health-iain-mcgilchrists-ideas-about-brain-lateralization/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0c322d2d3a1ae3fe79d5171f9ff626c8</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Soft Readings: VIII in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/soft-readings-viii/#post-26407</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 22:47:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He seems Pe-lead with development in Pi, although he’s another one of those developments that is complicated by drug use, since we don’t yet have a way to differentiate out the vultological effects layered atop of a person from drugs, from their type. Yet, it’s also possible that prolonged drug use may literally lead to changes in consc&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8310"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/soft-readings-viii/#post-26407" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">db345b5d89106ade5b9b8adc48ab0c99</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Model 2: J Systems in the forum Model 2 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/model-2-j-systems-draft/#post-26340</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2021 07:26:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite having Fe/Ti, had I written what Fayest posted above, literally every word of it would have actually been true for me as well. I also have strong discomfort with laws or decrees that limit freedom, even when I “know” rationally that there are perfectly good reasons for them. In practical, political terms I often support socialist-type pos&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8276"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/model-2-j-systems-draft/#post-26340" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7a31daae9171f8ba32136ad988348cd0</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic How do you experience nostalgia? in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/how-do-you-experience-nostalgia/#post-25023</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 03:16:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span><strong>Is there a nostalgic experience you feel like sharing?</strong></span></p>
<p>OK, yes, but it’s sort of lengthy…</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><span>What is your personal experience of nostalgia most often like?</span></strong></p>
<p>Most often, my personal experience of nostalgia involves reminiscing and replaying specific memories. However, the most visceral experiences of nostalgia are triggered by specific sen&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6905"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/how-do-you-experience-nostalgia/#post-25023" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">648aca18c6eb49135bd48025f3ecf7a4</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic How do you experience a &#034;flow state&#034;? in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/pepijeji-how-do-you-experience-a-flow-state/#post-24758</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2020 20:54:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most common way I can achieve a flow-state—or come very close anyway—is when I’m telemark skiing. I think this is because it’s one of only a few activities I can think of that I have a very high level of skill at. The experience of it the feeling of adapting to &amp; responding to the terrain around me in a fluid, fast-paced, 1:1 way. It’s ea&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6808"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/pepijeji-how-do-you-experience-a-flow-state/#post-24758" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ac9f8a34940461270218d1ade4f89d1a</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Redefining &#034;S&#034; in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/redefining-s/#post-24076</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 23:36:18 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'll have to digest the information in that thread some more, as it's fairly technical, but from what I understand on first read through it seems like it explains things pretty well.</p>
<blockquote><p>So you can think of the Ne-Si oscillation as having definite dimensions, but indefinite object ranges within them.</p>
<p>Si-Ne: The dimensions are fixed in their local&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6782"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/redefining-s/#post-24076" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7766b72a6a180259d4bd8ea568b03753</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Redefining &#034;S&#034; in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/redefining-s/#post-23991</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 20:36:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to clarify the comment I made above a little bit. After thinking about it some more, I feel like I veered into the realm of "what do I believe about parsing out information"--which involves the Judgment oscillation and all sorts of other things besides the S function. By contrast, I understand the way that S recognizes things as bounded&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6752"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/redefining-s/#post-23991" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9aa92ce1750b5729b9ce6c5c5dbe193f</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Redefining &#034;S&#034; in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/redefining-s/#post-23957</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 21:30:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@auburn</a>, been a while. I’ve been too busy the past year or so to contribute much to the discussions, but I've been following it more lately &amp; some of the new content has been piquing my interest.</p>
<p>So, I’m not sure how much I relate to the notion of every object having boundaries, as I’ll explain below. What I do relate to is the implicit idea&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6740"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/redefining-s/#post-23957" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e18422f93fa3838dce4a0dfef0e266cf</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Psychological Surveys in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/psychological-surveys/page/2/#post-23642</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 04:27:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img loading="lazy" src="https://cognitivetype.com/wp-content/uploads/hm_bbpui/23642/q0v2womnl3ro9zi3rw6fyawa6vqk6hwo.png" alt="" width="828" height="458" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">09145cc0a328faa678d2c73bae8273fc</guid>
				<title>Hrafn changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/6661/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 04:12:26 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7c95b98703883310f77702a5c6cb6da0</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/4/#post-18451</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:44:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Now that Se has been cleared up more in Auburn’s description I’m curious to return to this thread &#x1f642; I think my protests about Se here were made clear and the ones that matter were accounted for in the Se description, but I’m wondering how do Si users feel about the Si description now? Or is there something you would add?</p></blockquote>
<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/animal/' rel="nofollow ugc">@animal</a> It's been a while&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5055"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/4/#post-18451" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c7c4f015789662a4f133d0b30f8281e6</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic The evaluation of identity: Fi vs Ti in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-evaluation-of-identity-fi-vs-ti/#post-15921</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 02:15:33 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/animal/' rel="nofollow ugc">@animal</a> I understand--I didn't get the impression you thought Se/Ni was 'better.' My comment was more along the lines that I was thinking to myself, <em>what's the upshot of a Pe function that's less sober &amp; realistic?...</em>and I could kind of picture the advantages but was struggling to articulate it, even though of course I feel like there's certain&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3962"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-evaluation-of-identity-fi-vs-ti/#post-15921" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4433460cdc15a4ba172cb17096fa20ed</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic The evaluation of identity: Fi vs Ti in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-evaluation-of-identity-fi-vs-ti/#post-15906</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:46:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>And in the case of Ne, the trade-off from realism to possibility opens the doorway for self/other concepts to form that are less attuned to ‘what is’ and perhaps more hopeful of what may be desired/wished-for, or to a caricature that is more malleable to the whims of personal re-construction.</p>
<p>It has indeed been Deltas, more than Gammas, tha&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3959"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-evaluation-of-identity-fi-vs-ti/#post-15906" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">63f771ee22c322f2347872d0eff5b58d</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic The evaluation of identity: Fi vs Ti in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-evaluation-of-identity-fi-vs-ti/#post-15798</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 05:06:27 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>. The main point I was making above with regards to Fe, is its tendency to view the self as an object. This doesn’t stop high-Fe’s from feeling and experiencing life with vividness and personal significance (indeed, that seems to be the case), nor without holding preferences.</p>
<p>The difference being highlighted relates more to.. hmm, an ont&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3930"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-evaluation-of-identity-fi-vs-ti/#post-15798" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0f0929aafcfcb33451c6b244b75ce1cd</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic The evaluation of identity: Fi vs Ti in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-evaluation-of-identity-fi-vs-ti/#post-15777</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:53:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is pretty technical, and I have to admit up front that I haven't yet read it with the closeness it requires yet. From what I understood, though, most of it seems to me to make sense.</p>
<p>However, I do have one caveat...This part doesn't quite ring true to me, at least from my own experience:</p>
<blockquote><p>There is a necessary distance inserted even in&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3926"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-evaluation-of-identity-fi-vs-ti/#post-15777" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dc9b29cadfc0e757a50796e069307b4d</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Vultology Quiz #3 : 5 Celebrity Samples! in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/vultology-quiz-3-5-celebrity-samples/page/4/#post-15593</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2019 04:27:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some more thoughts/observations about the process of typing.</p>
<p>It was silly of me to say that I only needed a minute or two to type Bart Ehrman (who, anyway, turned out to be TeSi after all)--the reason I spent so little time on him was actually just becuase he was the last sample and I was in a rush. I got lucky in that he was someone whose&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3802"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/vultology-quiz-3-5-celebrity-samples/page/4/#post-15593" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6f55a948964b6c255b1698f89a353c9c</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic F attitude: correlations across types in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/f-attitude-correlations-across-types/#post-15583</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2019 03:10:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/alice/' rel="nofollow ugc">@alice</a> the experiences you relate about your development are very interesting and help me to understand Se &amp; directiveness in a more lifelike way. I agree with your point about Se being more prone to dark F because it's more tactile/gritty.</p>
<blockquote><p>I think your assessment of the Se/Ni axis being at fault for a ‘dark’ attitude of the heart is pretty acc&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3799"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/f-attitude-correlations-across-types/#post-15583" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">79fe1b19d24ff18bb6e89876ce8e14b8</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Vultology Quiz #3 : 5 Celebrity Samples! in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/vultology-quiz-3-5-celebrity-samples/page/3/#post-15348</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 20:43:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent probably 45 minutes on that Queen--even tried to use that new tracking tool--and I still managed to get her function pairs ass-backward. On the other hand, I literally took about a 20-second glance at the Bart Ehrman video before I recognized him as SiTe. So I guess my lesson from this is that typing by gestalt often works better than&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3637"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/vultology-quiz-3-5-celebrity-samples/page/3/#post-15348" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">87d268f8b1271c3ed2beffc883ef3112</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Vultology Quiz #3 : 5 Celebrity Samples! in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/vultology-quiz-3-5-celebrity-samples/page/2/#post-15313</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 06:42:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I'll give it a shot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4dc447e7c0099a82a69beb082f972089</guid>
				<title>Hrafn changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/3601/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 03:03:38 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c02ad94e44a1351d79af6be01ce5f9e7</guid>
				<title>Hrafn started the topic F attitude: correlations across types in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/f-attitude-correlations-across-types/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:54:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This almost feels too obvious to bring up, but I can't remembering anybody discussing this topic more than in passing, (not even in this thread from some months back: <a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/seelie-adaptive-vs-unseelie-directive-is-it-related-to-conflict-avoidance/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/seelie-adaptive-vs-unseelie-directive-is-it-related-to-conflict-avoidance/</a>).</p>
<p>Between different types, there seems to be quite a lot of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3485"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/f-attitude-correlations-across-types/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0c2b6e78bd9c4ca5f86dfe911561e8ba</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Why do you study typology? in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/why-do-you-study-typology/#post-14956</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 07:46:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Are you using it as a tool to better understand yourself, or others?</p></blockquote>
<p>By far the most obvious response for me would be that I'm using it to understand myself, but I actually don't know if I can separate the goals of understanding myself or understanding others. For one thing, understanding others means being able to simulate their experiences at&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3454"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/why-do-you-study-typology/#post-14956" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9c813cd1e4794d88a3a52c8a299889cb</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic J-Lead vs. P-Lead Thought Processes in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/j-lead-vs-p-lead-thought-processes/#post-14905</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 04:57:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been turning over this topic in my head a bit more, and I've started to feel like it's too simplistic to say that "Judgment processes think in words, whereas Perception ones think in pictures." For one thing, the experiences people've related in this thread don't seem to support that idea in any neat way...although anyway I find it impossibly&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3437"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/j-lead-vs-p-lead-thought-processes/#post-14905" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">82e7afe52e9aa687915b8eb5ef6be9e1</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/2/#post-13331</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2019 21:00:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta say, this discussion in mind-blowing!! I wish I had more time to write something, because I do have some thoughts I wanted to add about my patterns of experience with the subject of repetition and somatic evocation. Also, I've had some ideas I've suspected about the relationship of Ne &amp; Si to the subject of health: recognizing deviation&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2783"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/2/#post-13331" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">94c6cac154ba426e29c5606c855cb08f</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/#post-13211</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2019 08:32:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What does this mean, though, at the metabolic level? We see an object through Ne, the memetic ‘meaning’ of the object registers in thought (i.e. “my childhood toy”) and then Si triggers introspective sensory perception –an internal somatic evocation untethered to the present stimuli, but brought up by it. That makes sense to me.</p>
<p>This would als&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2743"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/#post-13211" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7fe5c9d8ecc8ec91358f658544e72cab</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/#post-13210</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2019 07:20:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/hrafn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@hrafn</a> – this totally slipped past me in the alpha/gamma thread – and I found it fascinating enough to be its own topic, I hope you don’t mind?</p></blockquote>
<p>Hahaha, maybe it slipped past you because I buried it in the middle of a 10,000-page rambling litany of grumbling mixed with half-cooked speculation.</p>
<p>There's a lot here in your comments here; I'll have&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2742"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/#post-13210" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ef7e09840245bb3d4d42335bb2e01af0</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic [Pi] Do you trust your governments? in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/pi-do-you-trust-our-governments/#post-12416</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2019 04:10:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What is your relationship to, or thoughts regarding, your local governments?</p>
<p>How do you feel about them?</p>
<p>In what ways are you in favor or opposed to them?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>And I suppose more generally– what political stances do you have?</p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In some ways I feel encouraged by my local community &amp; its government. I know some of the people involved with it and h&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2425"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/pi-do-you-trust-our-governments/#post-12416" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d2c32d291a69eb236f7071a381e4fcaa</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic [Pi] Do you trust your governments? in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/pi-do-you-trust-our-governments/#post-12311</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 06:40:13 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some <em>local </em>governments can be good--mainly those that are part of open &amp; functional communities, where there's a genuine dynamic of relational accountability between government &amp; citizens. But a big problem of large-scale governments (or large, integrated societies more generally) is that it's usually the scum that rises to the top. Granted, this&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2391"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/pi-do-you-trust-our-governments/#post-12311" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cae567dc60cd6d215aee3e1b94505dbe</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic J-Lead vs. P-Lead Thought Processes in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/j-lead-vs-p-lead-thought-processes/#post-11963</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2019 08:21:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting question, and one I've paid quite a bit of attention over the years. My thoughts are a mix of pictures, words, and all kind of other things (such as textures &amp; moods, which intersect with the visual, but aren't exactly visual). At most times both pictures &amp; words are present in my thoughts to some degree. While I don't know&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2329"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/j-lead-vs-p-lead-thought-processes/#post-11963" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">70d0ef5129f9691800c2fd8f3ccd7266</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Se/Ne/Pe &#038; Clumsiness? in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/se-ne-pe-clumsiness/#post-11517</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 04:26:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But you just made a helpful distinction! And that is what I likes when typology can be used to explain the ways we are seeing things differently.</p></blockquote>
<p>Thank you <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/animal/' rel="nofollow ugc">@animal</a>! lol, yes, the irony of that post wasn't lost on me!, since I was using generalizations to say that NiSe's are more comfortable with broad generalizations. I'm not categorically opposed&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2180"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/se-ne-pe-clumsiness/#post-11517" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">948eec3c117fd8c1fdb38c3d4a03aab2</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Se/Ne/Pe &#038; Clumsiness? in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/se-ne-pe-clumsiness/#post-11475</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2019 23:13:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Responding to <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/animal/' rel="nofollow ugc">@animal</a>'s initial post, here's where I think some of this resistance toward generalization is coming from, at least regarding differences in NeSi &amp; NiSe. As an NeSi type, my orientation is more anecdotal--i.e. I'm not oriented toward general patterns or trends so much as I am toward events that tell compelling/vivid narratives. While&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2170"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/se-ne-pe-clumsiness/#post-11475" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">018c73a51a167d69d96518c95ffa1454</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Soft Readings: I in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/soft-readings-i/#post-11203</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 05:44:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/rondo/' rel="nofollow ugc">@rondo</a>... Another thing I feel makes people unable to respond seriously to the threat of climate change (and respond to it as an abstraction) is that modern, industrialized people are alienated from the natural world in so many ways. Part of why climate change feels abstract (and continues to be a matter of debate) is because,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2099"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/soft-readings-i/#post-11203" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c98a8a15d00dc0a2a74405e9a469eeff</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic Soft Readings: I in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/soft-readings-i/#post-11159</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 06:26:01 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Whereas I actually share a certain propensity to focus on ‘how things are’ regardless of my own ideology, with auburn ; whether or not we both see ‘how it is’ the same way, and whether or not we agree on how it ‘would be’ ideally.   I think this is about N&amp;T being blocked together… seeing “how reality is.”</p></blockquote>
<p>This is an interesting idea, a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2090"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/soft-readings-i/#post-11159" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">aa4ff04eb466f118a7cd84800806b786</guid>
				<title>Hrafn replied to the topic David Bowie and Trent Reznor in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/david-bowie-and-trent-reznor/#post-11051</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2019 07:44:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been wondering if Viktor Tsoi (of the Russian band Kino) might have been a similar shade of Ji-lead. I'm having trouble typing him but he sorta looks Ti-lead to me.</p>
<p>The interview starts at around 1:15.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="Виктор Цой в передаче До 16 и старше 1988" width="500" height="375" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ysSiGfQM158?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>