<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cognitive Typology | Faeruss | Activity</title>
	<link>https://cognitivetype.com/members/faeruss/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cognitivetype.com/members/faeruss/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Faeruss.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 13:13:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4de7d66771ee8ccba98eb985be5309cd</guid>
				<title>Faeruss and urban are now friends</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/4787/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 20:31:46 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0ecdb9a3d69bdfb4f0c2b5fb7bdb60ab</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic FiNe l--l Seelie Marie Kondo in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/fine-l-l-seelie-marie-kondo/#post-17101</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:18:18 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>but it appears to me that the role of Te in the Fi-lead (remembering the principle of Conservation of Psychic Energy) is rather important.</p></blockquote>
<p>For sure, and this extends to all types. For example, I have always valued Ti and it plays a very important role in my psyche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">68662f69eac1f48716ebe40afcf68050</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Function Blending in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/function-blending/#post-16688</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 10:29:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/danny/' rel="nofollow ugc">@danny</a>. For what it's worth what you describe is consistent with the Ne/Si axis, indeed the feeling that "concrete experiences seem inaccessible" seems to be more of an Ne thing, where Ni users would still retain a baseline level of contact with raw sensation. But you should stick around and if you have been mistyped, I'm sure it will come&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4350"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/function-blending/#post-16688" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d4c067ad761b301a69df10fd881a8212</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Undertones of Explicit Judgment and Unconscious Motivation in the forum Politics &#038; Current Events</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/undertones-of-explicit-judgment-and-unconscious-motivation/#post-16335</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:16:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry to hear that you are feeling unfairly judged, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/jay/' rel="nofollow ugc">@jay</a>. For the record, I have no problem with you. I know I have some propensities towards being judgmental, or patronising, but I hope they have not reared their ugly heads too much in our interactions. As you say in your video, I too say the truth, or at least I strive to, and I am not&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4104"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/undertones-of-explicit-judgment-and-unconscious-motivation/#post-16335" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9164eb8d66918a0d74a08c21ca6faf8a</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Uncompressed/Compressed &#038; Double-E/I in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/uncompressed-compressed-double-e-i/#post-16311</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 14:08:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand where you are coming from <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/greencoyote/' rel="nofollow ugc">@greencoyote</a>, butI would caution against the notion that a particular development, SeTi l-l- in this case, is the most well adjusted. It might be the most well adjusted to a given life/situation, but I doubt it would be so for <em>all</em> situations/contexts. Also, to harp on my usual stuff, beware anyone telling&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4090"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/uncompressed-compressed-double-e-i/#post-16311" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">93d55f6e79c5debe9993f8a9401f613b</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Different Fe Expressions in Ti-leads in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/different-fe-expressions-in-ti-leads/#post-16089</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:49:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's interesting, I hadn't thought about it that way. I will follow your prompt by looking not at Fi-leads, but at Fe-leads. I posit that there is also a similar phenomenon going on. The two types of Ti seem to me to be a clarifying/critiquing/cleansing Ti and a more active castle-building/exploratory Ti. I almost exclusively engage in the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3991"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/different-fe-expressions-in-ti-leads/#post-16089" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2190ca9dd4619a11fa316e66b4d8ad27</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Lessons from my breakthrough in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/lessons-from-my-breakthrough/#post-15347</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 19:29:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/scientiam/' rel="nofollow ugc">@scientiam</a>, interesting. I haven't watched the video, but I don't relate to the issue of blockages. Though as you say, if how you came to develop functions is an important variable, then it makes sense, because my development was slow and not due to dealing with emotional issues. I do feel like Se is more in the background, probably because it&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3636"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/lessons-from-my-breakthrough/#post-15347" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1942b1c959f45b2a16329553564f6b8d</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Vultology Quiz #3 : 5 Celebrity Samples! in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/vultology-quiz-3-5-celebrity-samples/#post-15298</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 18:20:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">426e844d2c6a27752be60d4b13d6bfb2</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic TeNi: The Definitive Vultology in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/teni-definitive-vultology/page/2/#post-15030</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 13:44:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work, Auburn. It came together very nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4b56529cd31ba086f7cb16a0e08c661c</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Come see my video chat with Faeruss (now FeNi IIII, previously TiSe) in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/come-see-my-video-chat-with-faeruss-now-feni-iiii-previously-tise/#post-15017</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:35:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/sander/' rel="nofollow ugc">@sander</a> Thank you for your feedback. Yes, indeed, I have seen Vervaeke's latest Meaning Crises videos. I don't think I have confused the two, perhaps I can explain how I saw it: perspectival concerns yes as you say relevance realisation, but more conceptually it concerns <em>knowing what it is like</em> from a certain vantage point. This gets tricky and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3471"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/come-see-my-video-chat-with-faeruss-now-feni-iiii-previously-tise/#post-15017" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bd8e315e897ef811bd36551423177caf</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Come see my discussion with CourtJester NiFe I-I- in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/come-see-my-discussion-with-courtjester-nife-i-i/#post-14839</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 09:40:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>1) You are right, the pushing beliefs thing is about the conductor and reviser dichotomy (but that doesn’t satisfy me as to it’s origin and raison d’être in my mind, which is that I respect a person’s viewpoint if they are willing to articulate for me and I am willing to accept it in my mind to assess it’s reasoning. Pushing a belief would cont&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3381"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/come-see-my-discussion-with-courtjester-nife-i-i/#post-14839" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0031a55dbb722aa8b54df6c35b0ac129</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Come see my discussion with CourtJester NiFe I-I- in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/come-see-my-discussion-with-courtjester-nife-i-i/#post-14715</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:49:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this, guys. It was good to see your vultologies side-by-side. I can see the conductor vs revisor differences, and how Scientiam though not having Pe conscious has a base-line of toggling and swaying way beyond what CourtJester's is.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Regarding the content of the video, I have a few notes:</p>
<p>(1) Since you are both directive the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3364"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/come-see-my-discussion-with-courtjester-nife-i-i/#post-14715" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f30b78f1bdc5a36f3d3e07588afc3576</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Conductor vs Reviser Energy in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/conductor-vs-reviser-energy/#post-14691</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:44:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Auburn</a>. I like where this is going. So we're expecting this signal to hold up regardless of development, though perhaps mitigated somewhat by having the lower functions conscious, where we would see a smoothing/loosening of the forwardness in the case of conductors and a honing and tightening of the energy in revisors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">91e3e258ef7a55e615ff82c375c93025</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Developing to IIII? in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/developing-to-llll/#post-14544</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 08:54:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should not idealise the llll development or indeed developing other functions. On this I agree with Staas. <em>Different</em> developments are better/more apt for <em>different</em> things. Specialisation and generality are in a trade-off relationship, in the former we get <em>efficiency</em>, and in the later we get <em>resilience</em>. Depending on what you want, and on what&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3277"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/developing-to-llll/#post-14544" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6c8d5520ec4c503c43e961067830df0c</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Developing to IIII? in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/developing-to-llll/#post-14499</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 08:35:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/rondo/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Rondo</a>. I would add that there is no gain without a sacrifice. Some parts of  you must die for the others to be born. And the parts of you that die might not be so happy about the whole idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">85aaa1807832b8eaab064f173595a939</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Rondo&#039;s Type IIII Emporium in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/rondos-type-iiii-emporium/#post-14316</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:01:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rondo, this is a great idea, and very healthy for the development of CT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2ec61bb3f0b70126a6375c3cbc41250a</guid>
				<title>Faeruss&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/3150/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 08:36:19 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cb66c5b573967406dfa0d84a192b755f</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Seelie &#038; Adaptive vs. Unseelie &#038; Directive: Is it Related to Conflict Avoidance? in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/seelie-adaptive-vs-unseelie-directive-is-it-related-to-conflict-avoidance/page/3/#post-14240</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 08:20:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/bera/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Bera</a>. You have brought a proper sense of balance to the discussion, thanks. To complete the thought on the Fe side of the street: Yes, directive Fe people, we can be jerks, but so can adaptives. The method of execution is different, but everyone is capable of great moral (and physical) harm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f5c21b24e9f34a032e186f1a5930a939</guid>
				<title>Faeruss&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/3066/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:16:31 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b744703d82b180c960fbb4ff00461833</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic SeTi TiSe Discussion in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/seti-tise-discussion/#post-14038</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 16:48:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of things have value structures in them, indeed I think <em>all</em> things have value structures in them, but that's a topic for a different day. I wasn't addressing his system as I don't know it, but rather your "version" of it, and your preferences ---which <em>are</em> a value structure, especially as they relate to your wanting to understand why you do&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3038"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/seti-tise-discussion/#post-14038" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1e37988beaa190fac921d7b4b0a70327</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic SeTi TiSe Discussion in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/seti-tise-discussion/#post-14036</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:54:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having watched all of it now, there were many interesting topics touched.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I wanted to address <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/supahprotist/' rel="nofollow ugc">@supahprotist</a> 's bringing up of the three tiered model of explanation: computational, algorithmic, behaviourial. This is fine, but I want to/invite you to flip it on its head. The progression goes similarly: computational, algorithmic, but then makes&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3036"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/seti-tise-discussion/#post-14036" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fec550692d4f92673c987b7cfa7b0f1f</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic SeTi TiSe Discussion in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/seti-tise-discussion/#post-14035</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:42:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/scientiam/' rel="nofollow ugc">@scientiam</a> I think both are the case. They are intertwined, the latter leading into the first. At the first stages more emphasis on the as-per-needed basis, slowly moving into the ever-increasing blooming of consciousness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ce8e25cb3b239ae790cf98da66c68715</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic SeTi TiSe Discussion in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/seti-tise-discussion/#post-13995</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 09:21:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing this. The value of these real-time discussions is immense. Both on the vultological and psychological level.</p>
<p>Initial thoughts:</p>
<p>(1) You guys are typed correctly</p>
<p>(2) Scientiam seems to be awakening some Fe at times</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Overall, this made my grasp of what TiSe and SeTi look like much more solid. Thanks again, we need more of&hellip;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dd7a8a5c7a33c8638b4a6eef41ac1585</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Alin / Arcane Artwork in the forum Spirituality &#038; Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/alin-arcane-artwork/page/2/#post-13904</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2019 17:26:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those interested in the issue of masks and Japan, I refer you to Kobo Abe's masterpiece, <em>The Face of Another.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I have been thinking about Ti and Fe and how they relate to the issue of identity and meaning a lot recently. It seems that Ti <em>starts</em> with the intuition of form and identity and meaning and goes on to arrive at the position of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2999"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/alin-arcane-artwork/page/2/#post-13904" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b334e03b38989415124c4456badb4dfe</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic 4 Ways of Knowing in the forum Spirituality &#038; Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/4-ways-of-knowing/#post-13800</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 08:18:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/teatime/' rel="nofollow ugc">@teatime</a>, I am afraid I don't have a good source. I am standing on the shoulders of giants, one of whom is Vervaeke's work on neuroscience. Techne typically is translated as "art/craft", noesis as "intellection" or "intuition", gnosis as  (personal) "knowledge" and episteme as (theoretical) "knowledge". This is a shameful and massive reduction of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2962"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/4-ways-of-knowing/#post-13800" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cee7f1a7e3b83d254b8ff114c1c21554</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Functional Stack, levels of development and function descriptions in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/page/2/#post-13765</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:11:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@auburn</a>, thanks for your reply, it casts a light over many a shadow. That being said, it's hard to see how to use that model to distinguish the auxiliary from the tertiary. Let's take an example. SeFi has Fi and Te as auxiliary and tertiary, which according to your model we know they are subservient to Se's agenda. Further, we have the idea that&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2942"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/page/2/#post-13765" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3fc4ab6392b49b46894fc7d007cbb1ac</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Functional Stack, levels of development and function descriptions in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/#post-13599</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 17:50:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Auburn</a> I like where this is going, great stuff. That is a good take on functions as manifested across different types. We still have the trickier question of how different functions manifest within the same type. So yes Fe and Ti are both subservient to Si' map construction, in the SiFe say, but how so? Otherwise we do have hierarchy, but simply&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2872"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/#post-13599" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c8abffa15b5e79db011ee83ca636d1b6</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Functional Stack, levels of development and function descriptions in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/#post-13587</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 13:08:22 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great questions, thank you for asking them!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This is an issue we have been trying to iron out recently, and one dear to my heart.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For now, have a look at some of Auburn's preliminary thoughts on the matter here:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="NvyoQwXkzV"><p><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/hierarchy-primary-auxiliary-tertiary-polar/" rel="nofollow ugc">Hierarchy (Primary/Auxiliary/Tertiary/Polar)</a></p></blockquote>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted"title="&#8220;Hierarchy (Primary/Auxiliary/Tertiary/Polar)&#8221; &#8212; Cognitive Typology" src="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/hierarchy-primary-auxiliary-tertiary-polar/embed/#?secret=NvyoQwXkzV" data-secret="NvyoQwXkzV" width="500" height="282" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1a32ba209e8d526afe4e3850c13d6246</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/3/#post-13561</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 08:34:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the gripe, believe me. Though I would say that seeking novelty need not take the form of the disparate, random novelty you so abhor. In pursuing novelty, one can pursue and intensify the most salient avenues for fruitful exploration, finding the features that are important, this seeking for novelty can take the form of seeking the best way&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2865"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/3/#post-13561" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">74c38340c13773f54d159bbfca58e25b</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/3/#post-13542</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 15:19:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, as an addendum, to think that Se is necessarily tied to the senses and the physical is as wrong as to say that Ne is necessarily untied to the senses and the physical. As we have seen again and again, Se users are perfectly capable of being in their heads. <em>Concrete</em> exploration of novelty doesn't have to take the form of physical exploration&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2862"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/3/#post-13542" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">136d557821051b698853f60c58d268de</guid>
				<title>Faeruss started the topic 4 Ways of Knowing in the forum Spirituality &#038; Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/4-ways-of-knowing/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 08:45:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ancient Greeks had at least four different ways of talking about truth and knowledge: techne, episteme, noesis, and gnosis. Episteme is the closest to us, roughly corresponding to our idea of truth, truth in the propositional sense, statements of fact (The capital of France is Paris), and so on. Techne is more the kind of pragmatic truth some&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2859"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/4-ways-of-knowing/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fc8440f39126898b1aada3fdc437bdcc</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Ti&#062;Ni &#038; Structured vs Aphoristic Ni in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/tini-and-structured-ni-vs-niti-aphoristic/page/2/#post-13534</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 08:17:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautifully put, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/scientiam/' rel="nofollow ugc">@scientiam</a>. As for the last question, I would put my money on this difference coming from Pi being abstract vs concrete. Si-Ne has concrete and discrete chunks to operate on, so the stories it weaves end up looking like those of consequence and causality. Inversely, Ni-Se has abstract and continuous chunks to operate on, so the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2858"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/tini-and-structured-ni-vs-niti-aphoristic/page/2/#post-13534" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f0398e7014c9a70b8dab196b82b82f7d</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic FeSi: The Definitive Vultology in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/fesi-the-definitive-vultology/#post-13502</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 14:06:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/celeste/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Celeste</a>. We can be very confrontational when we think it's the best way forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">102897f1e92f67ca00bf32873733c4e7</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Ti&#062;Ni &#038; Structured vs Aphoristic Ni in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/tini-and-structured-ni-vs-niti-aphoristic/page/2/#post-13428</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 22:11:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/scientiam/' rel="nofollow ugc">@scientiam</a>, luckily cognitive functions don't have the biases of some philosophers and Pe does not make a distinction between the "real" (read material/physical) world and that of the mind. Pe can navigate your inner map just as well as it can navigate the great oceans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a204051d1cbb05af63f6c52b2defa24a</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic [Ji] How do you relate to this l--- description? in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ji-how-do-you-relate-to-this-l-description/page/2/#post-13423</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 17:57:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Addendum 2: </em>For such is the nature of such things, I came across another fitting passage today:</p>
<blockquote><p> I will behave myself wisely in a perfect way ... I will walk within my house with a perfect heart.</p>
<p>-Psalm 101</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d7e62acfe34a72f9a75cc88b77ba10b1</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic [Ji] How do you relate to this l--- description? in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ji-how-do-you-relate-to-this-l-description/page/2/#post-13419</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 13:05:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Addendum</em>: One should note here too the J-myth theme of divinity too, which is also quite revealing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">41c1b2a14b13f20fc67973465ed53596</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic [Ji] How do you relate to this l--- description? in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ji-how-do-you-relate-to-this-l-description/#post-13418</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 13:03:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across this passage from the great Plotinus that captures some of the Ji tendencies we have touched on in this thread:</p>
<blockquote><p>Withdraw into yourself and look. And if you do not find yourself beautiful yet, act as does the creator of a statue that is to be made beautiful: he cuts away here, he smoothes there, he makes this line lighter, this other&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2815"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ji-how-do-you-relate-to-this-l-description/#post-13418" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a15c6c6e25fcbe24690d31db4104be7a</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Ti&#062;Ni &#038; Structured vs Aphoristic Ni in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/tini-and-structured-ni-vs-niti-aphoristic/#post-13408</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 09:13:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pe perceives change, while Pi perceives sameness</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9aef4c3322e2e57436fb0284aa903110</guid>
				<title>Faeruss changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/2582/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 18:01:13 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fa9d8273cd1928d780dc3f0f910c7fa9</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Cognitive Type Pitch - Beta in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/cognitive-type-pitch-beta/#post-12881</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:14:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I approve this message.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>#tootrue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6d6d86c23fd10188325a4bb55ab53d11</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Sociology &#038; CT in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/sociology-ct/#post-11674</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 10:39:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding another data point, it has been my experience that the pull of introversion is very real for me, even having two extroverted functions conscious. If you were to observe me on my daily goings, you would think I am very introverted, I don't seek people either online or in real life, and keep to myself and those close to me. However, people&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2215"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/sociology-ct/#post-11674" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1f638f4e7bd665582c3a4239c14db3a3</guid>
				<title>Faeruss and Mish are now friends</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/2047/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:08:11 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e7520d9a9088dd0b3867b9aa751eee40</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic FiNe &#038; the MBTI in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/fine-the-mbti/page/3/#post-10871</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:05:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/elisaday/' rel="nofollow ugc">@elisaday</a></p>
<p>Your most recent video seems not to represent you very faithfully, and I think you are looking at yourself in the camera. I suggest recording a video where you don't do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8a4d86e964bd4cffc3335a8267dc0ae1</guid>
				<title>Faeruss and Rua are now friends</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/1923/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 20:50:24 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e5dac2b6b593c2ea404fb0f2e638a3a0</guid>
				<title>Faeruss and devon are now friends</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/1913/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 21:14:05 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">143fd8e18eb8e5ae61ac240e6e571d42</guid>
				<title>Faeruss and Evergreen are now friends</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/1811/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 21:58:01 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">10a96eb48e031e3e89dbb04004761995</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Alpha &#038; Gamma Interactions in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/alpha-gamma-interactions/page/3/#post-10584</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 21:04:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How appropriate that in a conversation about alpha and gamma miscommunication there would be alpha and gamma miscommunication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">eec810ca43173a85c31a7d09e2320709</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Alpha &#038; Gamma Interactions in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/alpha-gamma-interactions/page/2/#post-10341</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:10:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The main difference seems to stem from two opposing core epistemological assumptions:</p>
<p>A – To know a thing, you must step outside of it and observe it</p>
<p>G – To know a thing, you must embody it</p></blockquote>
<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/teatime/' rel="nofollow ugc">@teatime</a> Well put, and I see what you're saying about seeing both impulses in yourself. I think us betas and deltas are mixed types. Betas have det&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1703"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/alpha-gamma-interactions/page/2/#post-10341" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">206999aa1cdcb4b06e1aed3a1fcd6e2a</guid>
				<title>Faeruss and Bera are now friends</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/1683/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:18:08 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bb0e7605014fa56f19974a1f4ae1b068</guid>
				<title>Faeruss replied to the topic Big Five Results Thread in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/big-five-results-thread/#post-10239</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 22:45:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, it might be that directive vs adaptive hinges in one of the two aspects while remaining somewhat independent of overall agreeableness levels. Here's mine (by percent I mean percentile):</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Agreeableness: 0%</p>
<p>Compassion: 0%</p>
<p>Politeness: 0%</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Conscientiousness: 90%</p>
<p>Industriousness: 82%</p>
<p>Orderliness: 90%</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Extraversion:&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1651"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/big-five-results-thread/#post-10239" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>