<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cognitive Typology | Faex | Activity</title>
	<link>https://cognitivetype.com/members/faerie/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cognitivetype.com/members/faerie/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Faex.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 13:13:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cdccb80d5b820e7894fdb389a9196c3d</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Psychological Surveys in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/psychological-surveys/page/3/#post-23796</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2020 06:43:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just popped in to post my survey results.<br />
<img loading="lazy" src="https://cognitivetype.com/wp-content/uploads/hm_bbpui/23796/aq4gzd0rwsufwt4zbkm69mcujwx4qsoo.png" alt="CT Psych Survey Results" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">af543ae46fb1fd246987e2ca15b41c3a</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Development Levels &#038; Stages of Consciousness in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/development-levels-stages-of-consciousness/page/2/#post-21689</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 12:37:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>These four aspects are somewhat tied together so that the integration or progress made in one of them can catalyze change made in another, but that’s not always the case. At this level of granularity, one aspect may be at negative numbers (repression) while another might not be. So for example one might still have a repressed relationship to the p&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6526"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/development-levels-stages-of-consciousness/page/2/#post-21689" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">549232ab4f680b92b4b00eedaba21976</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Development Levels &#038; Stages of Consciousness in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/development-levels-stages-of-consciousness/#post-21680</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:12:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>To summarize, what you’re describing about your journey looks to me like this:</p>
<p>First: Your Te was repressed, attached perhaps to other psychic complexes, and manifesting as a daimon. The way out of this stage appeared to be Integrating it’s Behavioral Attributes (Skills) as well as it’s Archetypal Character (Bull).</p>
<p>Second: This brought you up to&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6523"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/development-levels-stages-of-consciousness/#post-21680" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6175a96a5b38e306508cedf74396ad08</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Development Levels &#038; Stages of Consciousness in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/development-levels-stages-of-consciousness/#post-21635</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 19:15:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's great, Aub, thanks! I'll reply tomorrow, but thank you for being receptive to my feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">17d7a7e84e9b024c8b102344d61cd6e2</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Development Levels &#038; Stages of Consciousness in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/development-levels-stages-of-consciousness/#post-21630</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:46:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aub, excellent!! I do agree with almost everything you've written. I think we pretty much see the psyche the same way, so that's great! And yes, your description of a repressed Te is not too far from my own issues, actually. I think I'm just a little bit lost on whether we define all shadowy issues touching upon a function as -1 or if that refers&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6511"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/development-levels-stages-of-consciousness/#post-21630" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f25f54504f7c7e9368517aaafde91ba8</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Development Levels &#038; Stages of Consciousness in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/development-levels-stages-of-consciousness/#post-21619</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:21:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Aub! Fantastic job, as usual. I have a few thoughts on it I've shared on the discord, and I further recommend the Jung to Live By channel where a couple of Jungian therapists with long experience talk about the psyche, shadow, complexes, the unconscious, etc., in a way that's highly insightful and, IMO, very effective if one is seeking some&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6507"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/development-levels-stages-of-consciousness/#post-21619" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9cdb07a4ab3fec7c141ab4634c130527</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic CT Constructive Criticism in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ct-constructive-criticism/#post-17381</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 03:29:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't know your situation, Cedar. However, my assumption is you were typed primarily from your vultology and that the behaviourism you point to was fit into it. Advocacy is a Je activity and it can be motivated by either F attitude since it's a question of values (what is being advanced/protected in the advocacy). I'd be shocked if mere advocacy&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4683"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ct-constructive-criticism/#post-17381" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">15393ca2e583dcde98dd0b7bffe41440</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic CT Psychoanalysis in the forum Spirituality &#038; Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ct-psychoanalysis/#post-16776</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 09:43:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The shadow is an interesting topic, and the way I would contextualize it in the above posts is that the difference between the daimon and muse (it’s the same thing at core) is whether or not the ego sees it as part of the self or not; hence the felt “otherness” of the daimon. And that is essentially a description of the shadow, as the shadow i&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4406"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ct-psychoanalysis/#post-16776" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">62faacf404cf1444d5c38873b71d0888</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Undertones of Explicit Judgment and Unconscious Motivation in the forum Politics &#038; Current Events</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/undertones-of-explicit-judgment-and-unconscious-motivation/#post-16338</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:34:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful words, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/faeruss/' rel="nofollow ugc">@faeruss</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2fb8b6559ef2ea3b38d0808b477aef1e</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Uncompressed/Compressed &#038; Double-E/I in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/uncompressed-compressed-double-e-i/#post-16337</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:36:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your 'double' terms, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/celeste/' rel="nofollow ugc">@celeste</a>! They synchronize nicely with the Double Extro/Intro we're already used to! Double J, Double P are just great IMO.</p>
<blockquote><p>Last month I started noticing a little habit that I didn’t have before Te was brought into consciousness and is one that funnily enough, causes me to be extremely embarrassed if anyone sees me d&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4105"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/uncompressed-compressed-double-e-i/#post-16337" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">307b187f8fc97d9c91c0c2b7c46b3589</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Volunteers for CT Youtube Channel Team Project in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/volunteers-for-ct-youtube-channel-team-project/page/2/#post-14574</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2019 17:32:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I have Dr. John Beebe’s books.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/courtjester/' rel="nofollow ugc">@courtjester</a>, which ones? I've tried looking 4 his books and haven't found any; just some old pdfs. Can you help me with links, please? I really adore his ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">75e066e0927b97da553a5512afcf3c90</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic [Fi-lead/Aux] What is your relationship with emotions/empathy vs logic/strategy? in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/fi-lead-aux-what-is-your-relationship-with-emotions-empathy-vs-logic-strategy/#post-14480</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 11:14:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel all the time. For me, peace is detachment from the emotional whirlwind. I aspire to be like that tarrot card: Temperance. Or strength.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9a670d8de4b0ef3def6ea53cae08c75f</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Seelie &#038; Adaptive vs. Unseelie &#038; Directive: Is it Related to Conflict Avoidance? in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/seelie-adaptive-vs-unseelie-directive-is-it-related-to-conflict-avoidance/page/3/#post-14239</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 07:25:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/ladynerdsky/' rel="nofollow ugc">@ladynerdsky</a>!</p>
<blockquote><p>Jumping in as an unseelie Fi-lead. I don’t think it’s conflict avoidance at all, and I think the descriptions and depictions of unseelie Fi as dismissive, haughty, vengeful, somewhat evil or grinch-like are exaggerated.</p></blockquote>
<p>When I said that, I was deliberately describing a misconception I had had, not an official definition. Not&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3148"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/seelie-adaptive-vs-unseelie-directive-is-it-related-to-conflict-avoidance/page/3/#post-14239" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">89be1f842083e0ac40752167789dacfe</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic About You? in the forum Official &#038; Introductions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/about-you/page/2/#post-14064</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2019 20:20:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/hannah/' rel="nofollow ugc">@hannah</a>, you use Se/Ni after all! Your eyes confused me a great deal, they didn't look Ne/Si brushstroke but they also didn't look Se/Ni intense. Interesting! Welcome to the second family!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d3e416c6bffaa71730d9d10780010c76</guid>
				<title>Faex started the topic CT and Kolbe Conation Theory in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ct-and-kolbe-conation-theory/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 12:57:08 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've brought this up in our circles before but not here and I should probably make a record of it, so here goes.</p>
<p>First, there's a model of the psyche that sees it as consisting of cognition, emotion, and conation. Cognition is how we think/understand etc, emotion is as the name suggests, and conation refers to ACTION. The part of the mind&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3031"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ct-and-kolbe-conation-theory/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">59b9096d9adcb692222805c036e7b38c</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Functional Stack, levels of development and function descriptions in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/page/2/#post-13780</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 17:27:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, ok, then. Np.<br />
I think 1&gt;2&gt;3&gt;4 is good for me for hierachy. There's a reason we think NeFi I-I- are NeFis and not NeTes. We might not yet be able to say exactly how the undeveloped Fi colours the personality but we know it does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4febf47499ec74c258de1108d743cae1</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Functional Stack, levels of development and function descriptions in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/page/2/#post-13767</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 10:10:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@auburn</a>, why did you split that away? I was contributing to these function stack myth ideas. :S Confuzzled.<br />
Essentially suggesting, per Beebe's model:</p>
<ul>
<li>Top function as the Protagonist of a person's personal story</li>
<li>Second as a powerful ally or mentor</li>
<li>Third as a side-kick</li>
<li>Fourth as the gateway to the Unconscious.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2f6ad06944ecc9c869eee584ef2d0417</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic John Beebe&#039;s Model &#038; Function Myths in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/john-beebes-model-function-myths/#post-13760</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 08:15:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, for me personally, I can say Fi is the goal of any "parenting" I do with anyone: I see the inherent goodness of the one "parented" and try to build their own sense of it (I take their innate okness forgranted and don't make them try to earn it; give them acceptance; draw their attention to the wonderfulness of their being, inspire them,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2941"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/john-beebes-model-function-myths/#post-13760" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a47f209eeca02af696ad39f5a567fa98</guid>
				<title>Faex started the topic John Beebe&#039;s Model &#038; Function Myths in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/john-beebes-model-function-myths/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 07:59:18 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm sorry 4 taking the thread off topic again with my Ne tangents (I promise it's not usually on purpose!), but to bring it back on course, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@auburn</a>, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/ladynerdsky/' rel="nofollow ugc">@ladynerdsky</a>, I wonder about John Beebe's Archetypal model.</p>
<p>He matches archetype to hierarchy.  He was one of Jung's own students and a Psychiatrist and he came up with it. Now, granted, it's based&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2939"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/john-beebes-model-function-myths/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">220f4e56ea4be612740c1f86b36d2aa7</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Volunteers for CT Youtube Channel Team Project in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/volunteers-for-ct-youtube-channel-team-project/page/2/#post-13755</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 04:59:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Auburn makes a great teacher. He just has to let go his hangups about how a youtube presenter is spossed to be like. He's not trying to sell an idea, impress anybody: Just stick to being himself, i.e, explaining what this fascinating thing is. Forget there's an audience. Pple don't realize the thing that's the best on the internet is authenticity&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2935"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/volunteers-for-ct-youtube-channel-team-project/page/2/#post-13755" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1a745223df716defa5d1667fa5637bb4</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Using Hypnosis to develop EQs in the forum Health &#038; Lifestyle</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/using-hypnosis-to-develop-eqs/#post-13744</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2019 11:48:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Self-hypnosis, for the interested! Just 40 minutes. <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O2EmFYL8ks" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O2EmFYL8ks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ba5b93892adb7c2367fc064ff8a36c7e</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic 4 Ways of Knowing in the forum Spirituality &#038; Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/4-ways-of-knowing/#post-13728</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2019 05:54:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s possible we have access to all ways of knowing but view some as being more certain. Both quadra and EQ may correlate to these four kinds of knowing.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree and would suggest that maybe even the 8 CFs themselves, rather than whole quadras may be closer or further from each kind; which would make certain combinations of them or whole quadras m&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2913"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/4-ways-of-knowing/#post-13728" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">696b94ecfa43284cfd27593cdbbd67aa</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Functional Stack, levels of development and function descriptions in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/page/2/#post-13658</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2019 10:43:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lastly, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/bera/' rel="nofollow ugc">@bera</a> (lol, so sorry 4 multiple tags but you said too many interesting things, so this is ur fault! 🙂 )</p>
<p>I love your description of Ni as the Hansel and Gretel Story. I think it is fitting since I really suspect that, like me, your Ni as your fourth might be the gateway to your own unconscious, which dark, mysterious, and scary as the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2896"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/page/2/#post-13658" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0a973603be34cc8861cb4d936ce602f8</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Functional Stack, levels of development and function descriptions in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/#post-13656</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2019 10:31:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@auburn</a>, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/bera/' rel="nofollow ugc">@bera</a>, I also thought in addition to the trauma thing, another factor might be ego. We haven't factored it in so much because of difficulty typing it. But I've thought about my issues some more and how they manifest and I think they manifest as a battle between Fi and Te agendas precisely because my ego may, after all, be in Fi, and not&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2895"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/#post-13656" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dd0c77561dd0ec5b5297f0c7bb8b1cb8</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Functional Stack, levels of development and function descriptions in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/#post-13654</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2019 10:18:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And when it does its functional part, what it does is completely unconscious and I don’t feel I really used logical thinking to arrive at the solution. This is why I thought I am an Ne user – it looks like I jump from one thought to the conclusion without seeing the steps I made to get there. But I think I don’t see them because my Te is uncon&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2894"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/#post-13654" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6764015ad1df9c5b3adcc5920fdc7d60</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/3/#post-13633</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 22:09:18 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/gabriellawinters/' rel="nofollow ugc">@gabriellawinters</a>,</p>
<blockquote><p>As an Enneagram three with a four wing and Si, I do very much indeed seek pleasure (in the suffering too), and to me the 2 aren’t contradictory (seeking pleasure and exploring suffering). I think your Se/Ni might be looking to explore the internal ‘meaning’ of the suffering, while my Ne/Si is looking to explore the inter&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2885"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/3/#post-13633" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">65da17c6e26faaed13fa95374b2ae9a6</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Female Figures in Religion &#038; Media in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/female-figures-in-religion-media/page/4/#post-13632</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 22:00:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I don't know much about tarot, but while exploring those cards and symbols in the past few days, I discovered the Empress and immediately was reminded of this discussion I had with <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/bera/' rel="nofollow ugc">@bera</a> ala Fi archetypal energy in the Madonna, Guan Yin, and Metta practice. I think the Empress belongs here too, like Tefiti in Moanna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">28fe65e0e1a918f8672ab3ff6a6a05e2</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Functional Stack, levels of development and function descriptions in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/#post-13618</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 20:59:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy cmolly, that second gif with black eyes spooked the crap outta me!</p>
<p>Interesting, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/bera/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Bera</a>! Maybe earlier traumatic experiences involving one energy might alter the 'standard' myth. I have ADHD, I'm Etype 9 core and have a deep complex around competence/incompetence stemming from countless negative/shaming encounters in my childhood and through&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2879"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/#post-13618" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9ad28a2594b160b77fdec839f5f2bc8d</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Functional Stack, levels of development and function descriptions in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/#post-13609</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 19:58:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my! <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@auburn</a>, this is great! I sensed something similar when I tried to describe the different pairings using Te as an example: Fi-Te, Pi-Te, and Pe-Te, though I'd argue it comes in more forms than the four. I wonder if what you write here about Fe suits just as well for Te?</p>
<blockquote><p>So Fe comes in 4 forms:</p>
<p>1st – Primary Fe (guiding the hierarchy)<br />
2nd –&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2875"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-stack-levels-of-development-and-function-descriptions/#post-13609" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">907825effa773dd4f559827157952809</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/3/#post-13564</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 10:45:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd also like to say "random" is the view of a person who doesn't share the process, not necessarily what's happening. All it indicates to me is that they can't see the pattern the allegedly 'random' person is chasing due to the Se apriori assumption of closed/absolute contexts. But this is just an assumption, folks: tis no truer than the Ne&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2868"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/3/#post-13564" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7616b7258884c5ea769f9b74937fd395</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/3/#post-13530</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 23:38:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/teatime/' rel="nofollow ugc">@teatime</a>,</p>
<blockquote><p>With Se, the user must make sense of the most pertinent objects in the frame in a single synchronic episode, and how the objects relate to one another. They’re forced to relate to one another when they occur together.</p></blockquote>
<p>I been listening to some two lovely youtube tarot readers in the past few days (I'm officially cured of my Christian t&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2853"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/3/#post-13530" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">23b5e8376b1f13c471088687f1c08295</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Ti&#062;Ni &#038; Structured vs Aphoristic Ni in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/tini-and-structured-ni-vs-niti-aphoristic/page/2/#post-13515</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 22:05:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if it would be correct to say that Si and Ni are two ways of tracking events: One (Si) follows a literal chain of causation ala 'This specific event A directly caused/created that specific event B which caused C' while another follows patterns of occurrences over time (the cycles/themes y'all talking about), i.e  '<em>Type</em> of event A always&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2852"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/tini-and-structured-ni-vs-niti-aphoristic/page/2/#post-13515" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d3f4490cf6f2047d46a290f83683b619</guid>
				<title>Faex changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/2836/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 19:21:08 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b614486a8cf809f9b23a1c9340276ae7</guid>
				<title>Faex changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/2834/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 15:58:35 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">20b5b1f15938b3f17296240984a2b2bd</guid>
				<title>Faex changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/2832/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 09:24:25 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4b5e783bc7cad3fefe6b39207cea71e5</guid>
				<title>Faex&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/2831/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 09:15:20 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c036c1e0008cba9742aa965db71b253c</guid>
				<title>Faex changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/2830/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 09:13:22 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6c9244370fcf40d1dbcb781b8fb3ae2a</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/3/#post-13412</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 11:47:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's another idea I just had after that discussion with scientism on Ni's and Si's weird sci/fi-ish abilities.</p>
<p>So far, for about a year now, I've viewed the functions in the way I described before: parallel meaning-makers, or 'proto-philosophies' as I've often called them on the Dischord. But here's a second way that also makes sense to me that&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2812"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/3/#post-13412" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">64c35cbd9ba0cf5c04ce54393331c3a6</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Ti&#062;Ni &#038; Structured vs Aphoristic Ni in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/tini-and-structured-ni-vs-niti-aphoristic/#post-13409</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 09:16:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/faerie/' rel="nofollow ugc">@faerie</a>, Oops, I apologize for only giving a cursory glance at your post. I hope other Ni users respond, both Ni-doms and with Ni under J development. <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/marcus-aurelius/' rel="nofollow ugc">@marcus-aurelius</a> said that he perceives the world inside his mind in a similar way, a small scale model. Though he didn’t mention anything about time. I would like to know if he predicts things t&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2811"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/tini-and-structured-ni-vs-niti-aphoristic/#post-13409" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">66c03e6f8f8ff4948598625e94bbd4a9</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Ti&#062;Ni &#038; Structured vs Aphoristic Ni in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/tini-and-structured-ni-vs-niti-aphoristic/#post-13399</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 06:19:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/scientiam/' rel="nofollow ugc">@scientiam</a>, No I wasn't asking you if you do holographic projections.</p>
<p>I was:</p>
<p>1) Asking other Ni users if they relate to your description.</p>
<p>2) Saying I think it's the parallel to Si's holographic projections.</p>
<p>3) Saying they may both have to do with Pi's time component. Si retrieves data from the past in a near literal way whereas you zoom in on&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2807"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/tini-and-structured-ni-vs-niti-aphoristic/#post-13399" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ab2b7195d3ca66213dcc47c412dda2eb</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/#post-13305</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2019 08:38:13 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if other Ni-heavy users do that zooming thing <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/scientiam/' rel="nofollow ugc">@scientiam</a> describes.</p>
<blockquote><p>The word “tapestry” really doesn’t capture what I perceive at all, rather I have the whole “universe/world” in my mind that I am able to construct and reconstruct (at times not at my will, but automatically) to perceive constructed events both past and future (not all&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2777"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/#post-13305" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">154ad66affe696455026f9173480742d</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/2/#post-13286</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2019 02:55:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, just to add to that same idea, I think we can see a small sense of this independence of the functions in something we again discussed in a tiny way in the Dischord. Conceived as independent processes, we can see how each of the four can sort of work with any of the other three in a way that creates a different kind of character/personality.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2771"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/2/#post-13286" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b53b066e7a17e93fdee7161e3c97e60e</guid>
				<title>Faex changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/2769/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2019 02:21:09 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8bc334381368f2b3de255f07b1d125d2</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/2/#post-13282</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2019 02:17:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I conceive of the metabolism of our CFs in a different sense than our current understanding. Our understanding is that the intro functions sort of get their data from the Pe functions. I don't see it as at all necessary to conceive of them that way if we are distinguishing the functions (awareness/consciousness) from the 5 senses and the sense&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2768"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/page/2/#post-13282" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">91f8abab91b4305827227aad5e1bcf51</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/#post-13264</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2019 23:45:42 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree re Pi and Time. I think it applies to both Ni and Si, being about continuity, in contrast to Pe's succession of static episodes.</p>
<p>I've also shared often that I have routines too, but for me, they're about not wanting the hustle of doing things again and again that might be cumbersome. If I already know I like this meal at this restaurant,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2762"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/#post-13264" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ff9f865068468b27e06c23cb4359868a</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/#post-13237</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2019 19:35:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/gabriellawinters/' rel="nofollow ugc">@gabriellawinters</a> made this post before she was typed TeSi I-II which I think I should share in full (I have her permission), even though not all of it relates to Si perse. The first bit of it relates to somatic awareness though.</p>
<blockquote><p>"It would certainly make sense of my sensory intensity and yes I couldn’t believe how spot on the Si d&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2752"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/#post-13237" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9b8a692d52870de60cc2b1765d2fe078</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Si &#038; Inner Sensory Experiences in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/#post-13233</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2019 19:25:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, go figure! I came here to start this discussion after the Dischord convo we started with <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/bera/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Bera</a> (in which Hrafn's post here in the OP and many of the things he has said elsewhere were primary cited authority, ha ha!). Glad Auburn decided to open the discussion here where Hrafn and other Si leads (and JeSis) can also contribute.</p>
<p>The reason I&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2751"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/si-inner-sensory-experiences/#post-13233" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">20d13f115563fbf9c7d5a30b13eb8daf</guid>
				<title>Faex and Gabriella Winters are now friends</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/2562/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:36:54 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b79b91beb59eb086d811351823cac82c</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Se &#038; Pleasure? in the forum Spirituality &#038; Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/se-pleasure/page/3/#post-12823</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2019 17:01:01 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If I had to theorize about the functions I would say that Ne has its own kind of volition too. I personally am not a fan of the idea of removing ‘volition’ from an extroverted function. I loved <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/teatime/' rel="nofollow ugc">@teatime</a> ‘s idea of ‘hunter-gatherer’ for Pe, and Se leaning more toward the hunter and Ne the gatherer (though it’s not 1-1).</p>
<p>Pe leads interac&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2535"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/se-pleasure/page/3/#post-12823" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1e13e20d80dcff00bcd58f71fc31629b</guid>
				<title>Faex replied to the topic Se &#038; Pleasure? in the forum Spirituality &#038; Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/se-pleasure/page/3/#post-12814</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2019 16:38:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We've had this debate on dischord and every example Bera came up with, I have in my own experience. I'm not telling you what Se is, I'm saying how accurate is a description of one function when its describing something pple who dont have it use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>