@auburn There are dual competing streams at play here: the intent…Read more

I found it easier to diagram than explain, but I think the emotional system is the mediating factor between external inputs (Pe with some Je inbound info) and internal judgment (Ji, but especially Fi). I think people who are Unseelie are compressing and minimising emotion in general, whether in the happy positive direction OR the sullen negative…Read more

If you're curious in his ideas it's here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdCba-F6nh-AYeFqIVtOGNw/videos

SETUP

Point 1.

• What populations? Doing Caucasian, vs PoC vs Asian in equal proportions? Treated as separate populations? Or solely analyse Caucasian sample to begin with? Is the Vultology code robust enough to confidently handle challenges in signal detection on…

Read more

Don't get me wrong, I enjoy the arts. I'm a serious amateur musician who thought about being a pro at one stage. I enjoy visiting galleries and museums. BUT. The sticking-point when I read Fi profiles online is this over-stating of Fi being desperate to express their inner emotions and feelings via an artistic expression, or…Read more

** potential trigger warning **

Earlier I’d been thinking about elements of Ji: alignment, purification, refinement, perfectionism. There’s a couple of things in my life recently that have set-off a deep introspection on whether my (1) thoughts, values, logic…Read more

All of the research I was involved with was more about pushing the frontiers of current knowledge and understanding, within an academic setting. I worked for a University rather than for a private lab or in industry. Typical ivory-tower academia. We were expanding models and building evidence mostly around “norm-based coding” of fac…Read more

I came to CT around 6 months ago, assuming it was already a complete theory and system with valid data to back up the claims. Realistically, it’s just not at that stage. It was and still is fru…Read more

But I have an alternate interpretation, particularly about typing celebrities or public figures in general. We really don't know much about them apart from what they're famous for.…Read more

I think I’ve made my description of absorption versus rejection, where pure body alignment is needed
for acceptance, too broad. There have been plenty of…Read more

I agree. The initial profile sent when I got my report (that might be more JiPe focused?) is more accurate than the main Fi one. And there might be…Read more

https://docs.google.com/document/d/16mFpHLWE9wHmwHEMYkAIajFSESh1marmI72hywu-tn0/edit?usp=sharing

I broke down percentage consensus for each signal (present vs absent) of raters versus Auburn.…Read more

I’ve got a CT theory question for discussion that’s been in the back of my mind and Candy’s meme on general bantz just reminded me.

A diagnostic system rarely has a 100% hit rate. Take a blood test for cancer as an example. Diagnostic results fall into 4 categ…Read more

It’s also great to…Read more

I get the feeling that people grossly underestimate the influence of their primary caregivers. The first 10-or-so years of childhood is cementing a basis of self-concept and belief system.

This seems like a really important factor influencing development too, @Pine. I really like what you have to say here about the consequences of development…Read more

You did this by isolating samples that only have a first-name, right?

@auburn Yep, combed through the database line-by-line and coded my own in Google Sheets. Wasn't sure if Koops or Chuck were volunteers or YouTubers, so they're in my dataset anyway. There's a couple of mistakes I've got in my data though. For example, I've just noticed for you,…Read more

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fvYXZh3oi6kEoXP4ESTqXihjHhg9i8YxoQv4AC9Nr-o/edit?usp=sharing

E-leads (N=35, 50% of the database, with 88% of E-leads being Pe)

I-leads (N=35, 50% of the database, with 62% of I-leads being Ji)

Overall development levels:

I--- N= 27(38.6%)

II-- N= 16 (22.9%)

III- N= 9 (12.9%)

IIII N= 1 (1.4%)

I-I- N= 6 (8.6%)

I--I N= 4 (5.7%)

II-I N= 5 (7.1%)

I-II N= 2 (2.9%)

Most…Read more

The Google Doc above is easier to read than my copy/paste below.

@auburn So glad you pulled this data. It makes sense that when including public figures there's lots of double E development.

I've pulled data from the new database, but only…Read more

I’m happy for my FiNe II (unseelie) dev video to go up on the database with an alias. Haven’t seen any others on there yet.

• I’m not asking for CT to be wri…

Read more

I was very surprised to be typed Fi-lead, having seen myself as NT temperament. In my online lurking here, I don’t feel like…Read more