<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cognitive Typology | Supah Protist | Activity</title>
	<link>https://cognitivetype.com/members/supahprotist/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cognitivetype.com/members/supahprotist/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Supah Protist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 13:53:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4449ab7fb17986a7c5d9145ecd8b8eaa</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Hello!! New to the community. in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/hello-new-to-the-community/#post-31762</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 13:03:42 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people do volunteer readings on the discord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f1525ce718ca70dd62ca23fc1fb05bf7</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Jordan Peterson personality in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/jordan-peterson/#post-31748</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 02:29:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most people here would argue that what you’re noticing is his developmental level. He’s FeNi ||-| last time I checked, which means his Se, the function you’re not seeing, is unconscious. So good eye I suppose? I don’t necessarily agree with this typing from my own perspective, but that’s how I would explain what you’re seeing using the C&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-11069"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/jordan-peterson/#post-31748" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f9584e7f9187422cd13c8806f67a2d8d</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Model 2: Mechanistic (D+) vs Negentropic (L+) in the forum Model 2 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/model-2-mechanistic-d-vs-negentropic-l/#post-31293</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2022 20:35:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been thinking about the different fields of science with respect to typology. Is it possible that if F is biotic ie biological then T is not abiotic but perhaps more accurately formal or computational? Maybe something like this:</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>Science</td>
<td>T</td>
<td>F</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>S</td>
<td>Physical</td>
<td>Biological</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>N</td>
<td>Formal</td>
<td>Social</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Because there is at least a social distinction b&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10640"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/model-2-mechanistic-d-vs-negentropic-l/#post-31293" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6605b63b32f53752274f5578d6429225</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Zeptoform as Ti+Ni &#039;Cabalism&#039; in the forum Beta</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/zeptoform-as-tini-cabalism/#post-31132</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2022 19:51:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really. The four basic dichotomies assumes by the first matrix are Pe vs. Pi, Je vs. Ji, SeNi vs. NeSi and TeFi vs. FeTi. The other matrices have different fundamental dichotomies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6e19913fe3c79b1f67b8bb9cb3370290</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Zeptoform as Ti+Ni &#039;Cabalism&#039; in the forum Beta</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/zeptoform-as-tini-cabalism/#post-31129</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2022 19:12:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. It’s actually 4D. In 3 dimensions it would look like a torus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ea7ea21b7619a04a23d80bbd9fb9d6b8</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Zeptoform as Ti+Ni &#039;Cabalism&#039; in the forum Beta</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/zeptoform-as-tini-cabalism/#post-31126</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2022 18:43:01 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your zeptoform and raise you one tesseract: <a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/118Fhjlpla6SGlY-rpr0j5MygqMrt9RbX26ztrhnR888/edit" rel="nofollow ugc">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/118Fhjlpla6SGlY-rpr0j5MygqMrt9RbX26ztrhnR888/edit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1755935099958e0f16b5206dc2b4a9b9</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist started the topic John Vervaeke: Ni Theory in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/john-vervaeke-ni-theory/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 19:57:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a behavioral perspective, Vervaeke seems to be discussing Ni in this playlist: <a href="https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLND1JCRq8Vuh3f0P5qjrSdb5eC1ZfZwWJ" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLND1JCRq8Vuh3f0P5qjrSdb5eC1ZfZwWJ</a></p>
<p>It’s called “Awakening from the meaning crisis”.  Themes include shamanism, psychotechnologies, metacognition, and meaning. It’s a historical overview of how we’ve interpreted reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4a346675e1f8b34c48e60d80f2d96f1a</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Pe/Pi/Ji/Je correspond to Big Five clusters in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/cognitive-functions-do-match-big-five-aspects/#post-30315</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2021 22:49:08 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another relevant paper on this topic: <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11097-021-09768-5" rel="nofollow ugc">https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11097-021-09768-5</a></p>
<p>And accompanying YouTube video: <a href="https://youtu.be/nJPQhRuWjXc" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtu.be/nJPQhRuWjXc</a></p>
<p>John Vervaeke and Garri Hovhannisian discuss the 10 aspects of the big five as relevance realizing opponent processes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bd9eeac8890d2bb4903fb0f2516e6b56</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Vultology Quiz #6 in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/vultology-quiz-6/#post-26098</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 22:24:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made some tables based on the quiz results:</p>
<p><a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sf-oone6T8bXNUNAiqssuLGNNfi_NHGp6utX-tMgxjU/edit?usp=sharing" rel="nofollow ugc">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sf-oone6T8bXNUNAiqssuLGNNfi_NHGp6utX-tMgxjU/edit?usp=sharing</a></p>
<p>Based on these aggregations, Ceema is an ENFJ, Azza is an ENFJ and Michael is an ESTJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">36482b81048705679f689bc655d0f683</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Vultology Quiz #6 in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/vultology-quiz-6/#post-26077</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2021 17:40:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m in</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d653f03ac436c43e866460ce2be993ec</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Model 2: The P Systems in the forum Model 2 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/model-2-the-p-systems-draft/#post-25831</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:38:11 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven’t read this all the way through yet, but this mirrors some aspects of quantum mechanics/field theory.</p>
<p><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complementarity_(physics)" rel="nofollow ugc">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complementarity_(physics)</a></p>
<p>“The more localized the position-space wavefunction, the more likely the particle is to be found with the position coordinates in that region, and correspondingly the mom&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7417"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/model-2-the-p-systems-draft/#post-25831" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5e09a91524edd434163bb508806b35d2</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Psychological Surveys in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/psychological-surveys/page/4/#post-25438</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 02:12:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img loading="lazy" src="https://cognitivetype.com/wp-content/uploads/hm_bbpui/25438/hyy9xlfsccu2vcstkl9ut0338b7dhoy5.jpeg" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8769e508ca88bf9de998e1bcc483d25d</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Redefining &#034;S&#034; in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/redefining-s/#post-23971</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:48:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@auburn</a>, what’s the difference between “Registering mental objects as discontinuous and discrete” (S) and “Definitional processing” (J-)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cc93470aeee0b93b7ef19cdea1868f4e</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic [Ti] Reductionism in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ti-reductionism/#post-23940</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:17:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/bella/' rel="nofollow ugc">@bella</a> thanks for the response. I don’t think I’m seeing the relationship between the two phenomena I described and the passages you quoted. Regarding the first phenomenon I described, I’m seeing more alignment with e quote you provided that describes IT. The question of “How do you know that?” seems to be requesting a linguistic justifica&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6736"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ti-reductionism/#post-23940" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9eb62261b135a6b185ba547f7e09e56c</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Updated Definitions of F in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/updated-definitions-of-f/page/2/#post-21036</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 13:37:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think is has already been touched on to an extent, but I think that the description of Fi as “uncoordinated emotional expression” isn’t actually that descriptive. The term irrational has the same problem, it only says what perception is not, not what it is. Saying a type of emotional expression is not coordinated isn’t a complete descrip&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6271"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/updated-definitions-of-f/page/2/#post-21036" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c140e7f49c6620f293e99c4f8c430593</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Updated Definitions of F in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/updated-definitions-of-f/#post-20992</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2020 20:07:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Anyway, since Ti is not the aspect of the oscillation that holds the ‘a priori’ of a cognitive agent, but that is allotted to the objective (Fe), this means that the Fe-Ti oscillation tends to be more inclined towards a belief in an [Other] or [Cosmos], or some externality, that is fundamentally the source of will and living qualities."</p>
<p>This see&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6254"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/updated-definitions-of-f/#post-20992" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ad50911cc215405c2489766555a28a5a</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Intelligence &#038; Abstraction vs Association/N in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/intelligence-abstraction-vs-association-n/#post-20951</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2020 16:05:11 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/safsom/' rel="nofollow ugc">@safsom</a> is another way to rephrase the constrained vs. unhinged dichotomy as differences vs. similarities between objects?</p>
<p>Also, if NT vs. SF is Unhinged vs. Constrained, is there another dichotomy for ST vs. NF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">131a7cf5979af2a075d410fd350bdc7d</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Updated Definitions of F in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/updated-definitions-of-f/#post-20944</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2020 15:28:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t think people can withhold recognition of agency from their perceptions of biotic systems and still interface with that system successfully. Slave owners may have treated and seen their slaves inhumanely, but they certainly treated and saw them as willed agents with agendas, intentions or desires. You wouldn’t punish a shovel if it was&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6233"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/updated-definitions-of-f/#post-20944" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e7381a6f317e901fd2ca33140a6afdc5</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Upcoming Changes to Fi/Ti, and F Attitudes in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/upcoming-changes-to-fi-ti-and-f-attitudes/#post-20925</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2020 12:54:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m still a bit confused. I don’t see how the self can be abiotic. “A funny person” is still a person and this biotic. Perhaps if Ti said “We’re all bags of water and electricity” or “We’re all stardust” that would be more abiotic? Maybe I just answered my own question? “I’m a funny person” in the way you described seems like it may be an example&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6231"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/upcoming-changes-to-fi-ti-and-f-attitudes/#post-20925" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">30ecfe8f7d8e4ce04285b5a35445e9ba</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Updated Definitions of F in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/updated-definitions-of-f/#post-20909</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 15:43:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Ti can analyze the self, or another person, or an idea. It is open in that way."</p>
<p>How can Ti analyze the self, or another person if it doesn't recognize "cognitive agents"? The self  and other people are necessarily "cognitive agents".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c9a379cab6e5ff2ca94e92c12d05c677</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Function Quadrants - Preparing to Rewrite in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/function-quadrants-preparing-to-rewrite/#post-20886</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 03:09:23 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be useful to conceptualize PiJi (I) and PeJe (E) as both “environments” in their own right. I think the same might go for PeJi (P) and JePi (J) as well. Well, actually it depends on what you are attempting to capture from a phenomenological perspective. Can all of consciousness experience be split up by these bifurcations? Is cognitive typ&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6218"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/function-quadrants-preparing-to-rewrite/#post-20886" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cbadd29a669ad166d27e7c3348c46b9a</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Function Quadrants - Preparing to Rewrite in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/function-quadrants-preparing-to-rewrite/#post-20871</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:03:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of "thinking as you speak" seems to be well reflected in the diagram I shared. Thinking as you speak and specifically "immediate feedback with the environment" seem to imply a stimulus-response loop; that's what feedback means. I think all of the oscillations may be involved in different types of feedback loops. Perhaps decompression is a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6213"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/function-quadrants-preparing-to-rewrite/#post-20871" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">981a2b4cb8314ab4b27e3c620f8a5445</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Dichotomy Maps in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/dichotomy-maps/#post-20865</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:10:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Socionics has dichotomies for these already. S and T are both "External" meaning they are explicit while N and F are both "Internal" meaning they are implicit. S and F are both "Involved" meaning they are visceral or somatic while N and T are both "Detached" meaning they are abstract or mental. So one could think of Beta types as being "External&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6208"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/dichotomy-maps/#post-20865" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5f35b7e7b313d008aeafbbc656a0788d</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist started the topic Dichotomy Maps in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/dichotomy-maps/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 16:45:27 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s a diagram that maps out the jungian dichotomies.<br />
<img loading="lazy" src="https://cognitivetype.com/wp-content/uploads/hm_bbpui/20840/5w3wgazqujkzamrgllh55nemyvwqm260.jpeg" alt="https://cognitivetype.com/wp-content/uploads/hm_bbpui/20840/5w3wgazqujkzamrgllh55nemyvwqm260.jpeg" width="500" height="375" /><br />
The left diagram seems to be accounted for in the new Quadra descriptions, but I think the middle and right diagrams may be useful additions to the theory as well. If the energetics and their oscillations are fully described, it would make sense to fully define the functions and their o&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6198"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/dichotomy-maps/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8f8e494ec35491db287c888c09d16712</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Notes on Methodology, Experiments &#038; Protocol in the forum Official &#038; Introductions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/notes-on-methodology-experiments-protocol/#post-20836</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 15:29:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we see the jungian cognitive architecture differently. Or perhaps, more accurately, we have different hopes as to what it is a theory of. The type of theory I'm after is essentially one of universal biological processes (like the Free Energy Principle) whereas you seem to be aiming at a more local theory. I do think Neojungian theories may&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6194"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/notes-on-methodology-experiments-protocol/#post-20836" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8b2d1854cb9697caf93a9b7fe6578b5b</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist started the topic Functional Conflict in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-conflict/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 19:25:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I may be experiencing a conflict between two functions. On the one hand, I’m trying to understand myself, which I associate with the Fi myth of Edin, but on the other hand I keep deconstructing what I uncover which I associate with the Ti myth of Alin. This makes sense on some level since Ti and Fi are opposed in many theories, but on a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6192"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/functional-conflict/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f5caec4442c64ec49f8f7470b852d18e</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Notes on Methodology, Experiments &#038; Protocol in the forum Official &#038; Introductions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/notes-on-methodology-experiments-protocol/#post-20816</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2020 22:20:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@auburn</a>, I don't see how what I understand as an interest can be primarily environmental. By interest, I'm referring to innate predispositions as opposed to contextual availabilities. For example, people get hungry regardless of whether or not there is food present. I don't think environment proximity accounts for people's choice of vocational&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6186"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/notes-on-methodology-experiments-protocol/#post-20816" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">719f8dbbef06c85c416bf140343e0e52</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Notes on Methodology, Experiments &#038; Protocol in the forum Official &#038; Introductions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/notes-on-methodology-experiments-protocol/#post-20808</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2020 19:01:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@auburn</a> is cognitive type not intended to model domain of interest? I think this is question of scope. I'm not clear on what aspects of psychology cognitive type is attempting to model. Cognition is not a well defined term in my opinion. Neuroscience studies the nervous system, a structure that is easily identifiable in organisms that have one.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6183"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/notes-on-methodology-experiments-protocol/#post-20808" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1d50af35bf544c3acdb85628429ceb29</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Notes on Methodology, Experiments &#038; Protocol in the forum Official &#038; Introductions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/notes-on-methodology-experiments-protocol/#post-20797</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2020 14:44:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how important should behavior be in determining someone’s type? This is the point I was getting at with the video I made awhile back. Let’s say that DJ Khaled and Neil deGrasse Tyson have the same vultology. How then are their behavioral differences to be accounted for. If cognitive typology is to have any predictive power, shouldn’t ident&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6175"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/notes-on-methodology-experiments-protocol/#post-20797" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">15ec6e4bcc0e73e70518f1a404f3932b</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist started the topic Function Quadrant Opposition in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/function-quadrant-opposition/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2020 18:04:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Je and Ji are opposite forms of rationality and Pe and Pi are opposite forms of irrationality. They are both opposing pairs of the same underlying process In this case, what are JePi (J) and PeJi (P) opposite forms of and what are JePe and JiPi opposite forms of? Proponents of the OPS would say that E and I are opposing forms of energy management&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6169"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/function-quadrant-opposition/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d33a55b81774af0f78ed8d26b9acc98a</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist started the topic The ACT-R Cognitive Architecture and Cognitive Typology in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-act-r-cognitive-architecture-and-cognitive-typology/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2020 17:31:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a diagram of the ACT-R Cognitive Architecture.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" src="https://cognitivetype.com/wp-content/uploads/hm_bbpui/20777/xywmo3ul65ne8hfz539f01ka1s1uhvpq.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>A cognitive architecture is a computational model of the mind that can can be simulated on a compter.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the ACT-R Cognitive Architecture's Intentional, Declarative, Manual and Visual Modules may correlate with the Ji, Pi, Je and Pe functions respectively.</p>
<p>Ji is described by&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6168"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-act-r-cognitive-architecture-and-cognitive-typology/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c75ae7a853f01519786161213fc85d47</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Function Quadrants - Preparing to Rewrite in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/function-quadrants-preparing-to-rewrite/#post-20763</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:16:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this links up well with my recent thoughts on jungian cognitive architecture.<br />
<img loading="lazy" src="https://cognitivetype.com/wp-content/uploads/hm_bbpui/20763/t6n69ldbyy6ytygoagagc8815nz44ic5.jpeg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Recently, I’ve been more inclined to consider the connections between the rational and irrational functions as fundamental. I know you haven’t necessarily advocated for that interpretation in the above post. What are your current thoughts on potential int&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6166"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/function-quadrants-preparing-to-rewrite/#post-20763" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1c4f6522ffd8dbba65806a7b4a4a7492</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Brainstorming Scientific Experiment Designs in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/brainstorming-scientific-experiment-designs/#post-20266</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2020 18:13:11 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I may need to contextualize this discussion.</p>
<p>Experiments test falsifiable hypotheses.</p>
<p>What falsifiable hypothesis do you want to test?</p>
<p>If there are several, feel free to list them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">23d0343c401ddf46896fcca2d16157f5</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Brainstorming Scientific Experiment Designs in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/brainstorming-scientific-experiment-designs/#post-20261</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2020 17:15:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what I meant by “dichotomous signal” is referencing the interpretative nature of the reading that would be done. The dichotomy can be used to interpret the data, but I don’t think it should be used in gathering the data. Setting up a dichotomous signal library makes people choose between two options, which would mean that they may bias&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5903"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/brainstorming-scientific-experiment-designs/#post-20261" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d0f4630cefec463d1919c7a1b0e84232</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Brainstorming Scientific Experiment Designs in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/brainstorming-scientific-experiment-designs/#post-20255</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2020 15:03:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a big thing to keep in mind is quantification. I’m not sure that measuring people’s opinions on which signals someone is expressing qualifies as objective data. Setting up a protocol that only records the the quantitative correlates of the signals may be more reliable. For example, actually measuring the number of discrete shoulder shr&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5901"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/brainstorming-scientific-experiment-designs/#post-20255" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0fc171c16a24ecc3fb6d8c5f1f8f973f</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Suggestions on good Neural Network Resources? in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/suggestions-on-good-neural-network-resources/#post-20246</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 19:35:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's some literature on cognitive architectures and personality specifically:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/2004/SS-04-02/SS04-02-017.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/2004/SS-04-02/SS04-02-017.pdf</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/dt02n4qijz90i62/sun-COGSYS-2014.pdf?dl=0" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.dropbox.com/s/dt02n4qijz90i62/sun-COGSYS-2014.pdf?dl=0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">85315a40743ab02b49300ba8860817be</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Suggestions on good Neural Network Resources? in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/suggestions-on-good-neural-network-resources/#post-20244</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 17:54:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think cognitive architectures are related: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_architecture" rel="nofollow ugc">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_architecture</a></p>
<p>Also: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfO4EkoGh40" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfO4EkoGh40</a></p>
<p>Check out SOAR, ACT-R, and SIGMA.</p>
<p>Lastly: <a href="https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~jhoey/teaching/cogsci600/papers/laird.standard.aimag.2017.PDF" rel="nofollow ugc">https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~jhoey/teaching/cogsci600/papers/laird.standard.aimag.2017.PDF</a></p>
<p>Don't know if you saw what I linked awhile back, but these are what&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5891"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/suggestions-on-good-neural-network-resources/#post-20244" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0480ed28417461500cee84ebcc27e16a</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist started the topic [Ti] Reductionism in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ti-reductionism/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 19:51:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do other Ti people experience these phenomena?</p>
<p>Phenomenon 1:</p>
<p>I'll have a thought in the form of a proposition [P]. These propositions can take many forms, such as "I am human" or "The sky is blue".</p>
<p>The proposition will trigger a question that takes the form "How do I know [P]?" Where [P] is the aforementioned proposition.</p>
<p>This may trigger&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5579"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ti-reductionism/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4ca15e2a94644bb5f5be9cf4bc2fd2d6</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic The &#039;Ti Void&#039; in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-ti-void/#post-19384</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 23:45:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/alerith/' rel="nofollow ugc">@alerith</a> I guess I’m indifferent towards it emotionally, but I value its presence. Questions like “How do I know that?” and “What do I mean by that?” are useful in that they protect me from believing untenable thoughts. However, I’m not sure that what I’m experiencing is actually an example of Ti. I’m not asking “What is X?”, but rather “How do&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5454"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-ti-void/#post-19384" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1476c440099d9eb81d8b81d969a4b335</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic A Computational Metaphor in the forum Model 2 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/a-computational-metaphor/page/2/#post-19287</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:28:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@auburn</a>, I actually have more of a general question. How have you formulated these functional definitions and their computational metaphors from the empirical data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ec58914ff77d216b58259dddf9d3bcd8</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic A Computational Metaphor in the forum Model 2 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/a-computational-metaphor/#post-18890</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on the first draft of your <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_architecture" rel="nofollow ugc">cognitive architecture</a>!</p>
<p>Observations:</p>
<ol>
<li>It seems that part of the worldview function (datasets) is referenced by the the explorer function, but not vice versa. Should this be the case if the the two functions are part of the same oscillation.</li>
<li>It seems that in the compass function that an objects are&hellip;</li>
</ol>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5235"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/a-computational-metaphor/#post-18890" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">271f90e7b1f3a2eecd812350accb9aea</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Socionics &#038; Aušra Augustinavičiūtė in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/socionics-ausra-augustinaviciute/#post-18839</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 14:59:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve already shared this data with <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/echidna1000/' rel="nofollow ugc">@echidna1000</a> and <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@auburn</a>, but here it is in case others are curious.</p>
<p><a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n8sidNWhMyELuSwAlKTvLa9Ip0FdjsTz5a_9_iai_n4" rel="nofollow ugc">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n8sidNWhMyELuSwAlKTvLa9Ip0FdjsTz5a_9_iai_n4</a></p>
<p>This sheet compares 81 celebrity typings from WSS and CT. Of the six comparison sheets I’ve made currently comparing the typings of four typology groups, thi&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5212"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/socionics-ausra-augustinaviciute/#post-18839" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">506a7c4a76f8fd8e991167640656c94a</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Socionics &#038; Aušra Augustinavičiūtė in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/socionics-ausra-augustinaviciute/#post-18812</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 21:13:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Conductor Brow: Is brow heaviness a factor of usage or anatomy? I think it might be a mixture of both and it may be the case that anatomical features may correlate with psychology, but I wasn’t aware of that signal.</p>
<p>2) Taut Square Cheeks:  I don’t understand how the taut square cheeks signal is read without a smile present.</p>
<p>3) Behavior: Econ&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5206"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/socionics-ausra-augustinaviciute/#post-18812" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1db7227adee1acfba70c4d05968b825b</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Experiment on Cognitive Functions in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/experiment-on-cognitive-functions/#post-18757</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 19:01:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“How to” questions could stimulate Je.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b8a4055e819dc5fc19ef158ba1c5ca6f</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic The &#039;Ti Void&#039; in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-ti-void/#post-18754</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2020 23:55:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought “the void” was my pattern of questioning all of my assertions or thoughts. I thought the original Alin Mythology entry encapsulated it well. For me, if this is Alin, it’s not that esoteric or abstract, it’s my asking myself “How do you know that?” “What do you mean by that?” etc. It’s not a sense or anything static, it’s more of the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5174"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-ti-void/#post-18754" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8b62a14aedacbb71fcd5ea3e98f411a7</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist started the topic CT Constructive Criticism in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ct-constructive-criticism/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 21:24:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want CT to work, but I don't think it's working.</p>
<p>The main point I address in this video is the lack of behavioral and mythological parallels between members of the same type.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="CT Constructive Criticism" width="500" height="375" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4KqBSg7t4nQ?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8d628cc190230c8117ba9cce5aaf5a23</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist started the topic Statistical Typology Project in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/statistical-typology-project/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 23:08:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who don't know, I've written some code that can calculate statistics based on a collection of typings. For example, if you've been typed as an introvert 10/12 times the code can tell you the probability of getting a result that strong or stronger by random chance. In the case of the prior example the probability would be .0386.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4617"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/statistical-typology-project/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">64ae52f98e6c200dc325544e70c41682</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Vultology Quiz #4: 1 Sample! in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/vultology-quiz-4-1-sample/page/3/#post-17037</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 01:01:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@auburn</a> I think it means that a collective and consistent vocabulary has begun to form. However, this doesn't necessarily mean that what has been identified constitutes a discrete physiological reality. I can share a thought I had recently to illustrate my point. Take colors. Everyone can recognize colors, but color is not a discrete phenomenon,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4552"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/vultology-quiz-4-1-sample/page/3/#post-17037" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b040e47641f4ed5fa6dd3de3f1c381bf</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Vultology Quiz #4: 1 Sample! in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/vultology-quiz-4-1-sample/page/2/#post-17015</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:58:42 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any signal with at least 10 sightings would have a .04 chance of getting the same amount of sightings or more randomly.</p>
<p>The signals with at least 10 sightings are Je-5, Pe-2, Fi-1, and Fi-3.</p>
<p>Additionally, any signal with 2 sightings or less would also have a low chance (.04) of occurring randomly.</p>
<p>There's a lot of those thought and  don't&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4546"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/vultology-quiz-4-1-sample/page/2/#post-17015" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6f53db76d9a5561ccdec8195c16feedd</guid>
				<title>Supah Protist replied to the topic Vultology Quiz #4: 1 Sample! in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/vultology-quiz-4-1-sample/page/2/#post-17013</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:44:08 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I calculated some stats on the aggregate results.</p>
<p>These are the odds of getting the same results or stronger by chance.</p>
<p>Any probability less than .05 is commonly regarded as statistically significant.</p>
<p>J/P: .000667</p>
<p>C/R: .746962*</p>
<p>SeNi/NeSi: .000009</p>
<p>TeFi/FeTi: 1.74990416061e-27 (very small)</p>
<p>*Conductor/Reviser signals are calculated as the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4544"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/vultology-quiz-4-1-sample/page/2/#post-17013" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>