<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cognitive Typology | safsom | Activity</title>
	<link>https://cognitivetype.com/members/safsom/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cognitivetype.com/members/safsom/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for safsom.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 13:32:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">edfe723f0ff13af876ddc5e8b7471646</guid>
				<title>safsom&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/11382/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 19:36:05 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e802a49503dde5830550cc56ad5b7532</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Model 2: J Systems in the forum Model 2 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/model-2-j-systems-draft/#post-26608</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2021 18:15:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any way to contact you outside of the forum, Chaika? I am interested in discussing this with you further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d99cae0aee60d107f65e3de71fc9858d</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Computation from the fundamentals - applications to CT in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/computation-from-the-fundamentals-applications-to-ct/#post-26390</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 13:24:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of my post was not to express the idea behind why exactly a computational model does not work generally - that's been done many times (and I saw your thread on it, where I think the argument is good, and I err on the side of agreeing with you). The reason I have tried to provide every single possible detail here is to show that not only&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8298"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/computation-from-the-fundamentals-applications-to-ct/#post-26390" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b1839315d3712b6d208bbbf5c70f675e</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic V- (Ni) Computation in the forum Model 2 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/v-ni-computation/#post-26246</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:24:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Auburn, if possible, I would really appreciate a pseudocode implementation of the algorithm required for Ni to abstract its way to the king archetype image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4a5a173517f97bdded2cea290f96c09e</guid>
				<title>safsom and D are now friends</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/8195/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2021 09:12:51 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f7b58c2a972b1c50c4b9d6076b001deb</guid>
				<title>safsom started the topic Computation from the fundamentals - applications to CT in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/computation-from-the-fundamentals-applications-to-ct/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2021 03:29:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>
<p>There has recently been an explosion of interest in all fields about computation - with computational models for the mind propping up left and right, the question of what computation is has not ever been more important to consider than it is now. Especially relevant to CT is the bearing that the definition of computation has on the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8194"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/computation-from-the-fundamentals-applications-to-ct/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7b5771d9b45baf79cb050e1a15990624</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Psychological Surveys in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/psychological-surveys/page/4/#post-25441</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 06:08:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img loading="lazy" src="https://cognitivetype.com/wp-content/uploads/hm_bbpui/25441/ptn841lxu6mekhz6hrrfyyu3bl325nc1.jpeg" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c9bd1ef460991258edccd7c1c85f07f1</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Behaviouralism of Emotional Attitudes in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/behaviouralism-of-emotional-attitudes/#post-25385</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 16:46:13 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These elaborations are all unnecessarily complex, in my opinion. The difference between positive F attitudes and negative F attitudes is rather easy to grasp conceptually, in my view. I prefer to articulate it as emotional "pragmatism" versus emotional "embodiment".</p>
<p>Unseelies and directives generally repress the controlled embodiment and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7124"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/behaviouralism-of-emotional-attitudes/#post-25385" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bf99cb0027ce7609818fb88d3bbab08c</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic The myth of Te - Updates in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-myth-of-te-updates/page/2/#post-25384</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 16:40:23 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way that I prefer to understand this is actually related the most to introversion and extroversion.</p>
<p>Je and Ji have one fundamental difference to one another. Both of them demarcate boundaries between idealizations of objects (or in other words, they formulate ideal personal values), hence both can be prone to disgust or anger at the internal&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7123"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-myth-of-te-updates/page/2/#post-25384" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">36aec47a8b4b186e6a144c67072125c8</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic How do you experience nostalgia? in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/how-do-you-experience-nostalgia/#post-25150</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:14:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you Si blind ENTJ monster, you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a1037675732f7d6f44dc922d097ba37d</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Model 2: J+ Procedural Processing in the forum Model 2 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/model-2-j-procedural-processing/#post-24968</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 18:53:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say that I think that the analogy of a means to monitor vector interactions is quite an accurate one to capture the essence of Je - I see it in a very similar way (but also a subtly different way from the one you have outlined here, which I think will be a point of agreement), where the organization of objects in terms of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6882"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/model-2-j-procedural-processing/#post-24968" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1ef5e650d3eda1d62355045d5381d191</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic The Magic Diamond (Dario Nardi) in the forum Official &#038; Introductions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-magic-diamond-dario-nardi/#post-24062</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:59:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically everything Nardi has done has been completely made-up.</p>
<p>The methodological rigor behind his studies is basically zero. He based his "function presence" analysis on making people self-type using the interaction styles and other Keirseyan dichotomies (which Keirsey himself has said have no causal link to cognitive functions at all), and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6777"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/the-magic-diamond-dario-nardi/#post-24062" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7fbb729e51ba541dd38284d06faa5152</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Moving from Model 1 to Model 2 in the forum Model 2 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/moving-from-model-1-to-model-2/#post-24031</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2020 10:44:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dario Nardi is a horrible person and a fraud, and if CT is to be taken seriously, I suggest any association or even allusion to his work be removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">82cebcb39c6665961bbc911406f4f81d</guid>
				<title>safsom and Ninth are now friends</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/6666/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 21:20:09 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4015260659b487291cf414d0f3ebd695</guid>
				<title>safsom started the topic A derivation of the quadras in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/a-derivation-of-the-quadras/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 05:25:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>
<p>In my time on the CT server, I encountered an array of conversations on the expression of quadra values; most peculiar to me was a particular method of quadra analysis that wasn't quite based on direct comparison between the mechanical components of each quadra (the usual analytic approach to deriving similarities and relations), but&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6594"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/a-derivation-of-the-quadras/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4c10d32aa61a23b409cec5e2bd51afd6</guid>
				<title>safsom started the topic NiFe directive case study: Bruce Wayne in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/nife-directive-case-study-bruce-wayne/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2020 15:32:33 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>Blind Prisoner:</strong> You do not fear death. You think this makes you strong. It makes you weak.<br />
<strong>Bruce Wayne:</strong> Why?<br />
<strong>Blind Prisoner:</strong> How can you move faster than possible, fight longer than possible without the most powerful impulse of the spirit: the fear of death?<br />
<strong>Bruce Wayne:</strong> I do fear death. I fear dying in here, while my city burns, and there’s no&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6573"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/nife-directive-case-study-bruce-wayne/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8ab628e87f07dbff17d480ae891c3a74</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Article on &#034;F&#034; - (Draft) in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/article-on-f-draft/#post-21704</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2020 14:14:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>
<p>Some interesting discussion happening here. In my eyes at least this seems to be all the more reason for CT to stop using Jungian notation as a whole (especially after the metabolic process explication Auburn made in the post above, which I will attempt to address later on this post - both theoretically and in terms of practical and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6537"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/article-on-f-draft/#post-21704" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4baf52ddaae661b8e95a31fc42df16e5</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Upcoming Changes to Fi/Ti, and F Attitudes in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/upcoming-changes-to-fi-ti-and-f-attitudes/#post-21697</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:32:08 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that I find interesting is that though the correlations you outline seem mainly sound (regarding the orientation that lower Je types might have towards being "theorists" and higher Je types might have towards being "pragmatists), I think the manifestations of this are very likely to be rather different for conductors and revisors - and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6535"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/upcoming-changes-to-fi-ti-and-f-attitudes/#post-21697" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9938007a39409c2460a7883be8f8396a</guid>
				<title>safsom started the topic &#034;Stimming&#034; as a function-signal in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/stimming-as-a-function-signal/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 02:58:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will try my best to keep this post concise as I really do not so much need for it to be a very long one, and in order to facilitate this process, instead of explaining "stimming" myself, I will provide an external explanation.</p>
<blockquote><p>Almost everyone engages in some form of self-stimulating behavior. You might bite your nails or twirl your hair around&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6520"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/stimming-as-a-function-signal/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">707fa81d310d371b0fdec4d16b8761e8</guid>
				<title>safsom started the topic On the conductor/revisor dichotomy in the forum The General Hall</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/on-the-conductor-revisor-dichotomy/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2020 18:00:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Taken from a DM discussion on Discord)</p>
<p>But this next message should draw links between typology, dialectical monism, and the problems with American politics</p>
<p>In general, I have thought a great deal recently about Freud's conceptualiztions of conscious reasoning / unconscious reasoning and analogies to the ideas of internal languages and external&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6454"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/on-the-conductor-revisor-dichotomy/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bdff86eda5494c73e8c8193bb48dff74</guid>
				<title>safsom&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/6442/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:50:44 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e78bf2f8886f908d41a19d0ca6227e2b</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Gwen Stefani ESFP I-I- with developed Te, initially seemed like Je dominant. in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/gwen-stefani-esfp-i-i-with-developed-te-initially-seemed-like-je-dominant/#post-21347</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2020 03:11:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img loading="lazy" src="https://cognitivetype.com/wp-content/uploads/hm_bbpui/21347/r8g9mxlxpat8183b8nxkle1tcvanp9o9.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>Here is where you used the nomenclature. It's not only on this thread, but several others that I have observed this. I am aware that you were not attempting to introduce Keirseyan baggage into your analysis, but you have to understand the four-letter codes have been used to the point where even <em>without </em>the intention of using them to represent t&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6421"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/gwen-stefani-esfp-i-i-with-developed-te-initially-seemed-like-je-dominant/#post-21347" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">42394388b9de9efc1dd8b22bc4c9a5db</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Gwen Stefani ESFP I-I- with developed Te, initially seemed like Je dominant. in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/gwen-stefani-esfp-i-i-with-developed-te-initially-seemed-like-je-dominant/#post-21339</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2020 15:49:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not here to comment on the typing, but rather the nomenclature used for them. In particular, I would refrain from referring to any CT typing through an MBTI four-letter code.</p>
<p>The four-letter codes have grown to be largely associated with the Keirsey portraits of each type; which differ rather drastically from the observations we can make&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6415"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/gwen-stefani-esfp-i-i-with-developed-te-initially-seemed-like-je-dominant/#post-21339" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7544b1185ea5ee03a792a277bafc01e1</guid>
				<title>safsom changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/6397/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 02:04:48 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">88bf6c15661debf3e724ba1ad3297c9d</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Future Timeline: AR/VR in the forum Politics &#038; Current Events</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/future-timeline-ar-vr/#post-21282</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2020 10:52:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/auburn/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Auburn</a></p>
<p>Interesting response, however, I do still think that some of the points are missing the mark (albeit being fairly fun for me to engage with and think about). Before I respond to them, however, I will follow your steps for the sake of structure and attempt to summarize the main points for your response as a way to construct my own&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6380"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/future-timeline-ar-vr/#post-21282" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">31632e507dba4956f7c12bc6cc0e6667</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Future Timeline: AR/VR in the forum Politics &#038; Current Events</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/future-timeline-ar-vr/#post-21247</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2020 13:39:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Responses</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>This trend will slowly start in 2025 but really mature by 2035. To give a practical idea of why this seems inevitable to me– it’s because of the power of the form factor and use cases.</p></blockquote>
<p>While I can see while you may think this, I view this issue rather differently, and this arises out of the necessity to view the emergence and rise to pro&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6374"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/future-timeline-ar-vr/#post-21247" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6010d2599ba897393785c9add0f74180</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Future Timeline? in the forum Politics &#038; Current Events</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/future-timeline/#post-21243</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2020 09:27:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Initial Remarks</strong></p>
<p>Many of these predictions are fascinating, and as Mitchell has said above, I am very impressed that they encompass such a wide sphere of topics. These predictions more likely than not originate (like the predictions of anyone else) in your mind; the mind has supplied you with premises and pre-stored information, and you have used&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6372"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/future-timeline/#post-21243" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">73fd50d33e69de65106715978ce725aa</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Exploring links between psychoanalysis and CT - discord convo port in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/exploring-links-between-psychoanalysis-and-ct-discord-convo-port/#post-21168</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 07:10:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A critique of systematic frameworks of individuation (Jung's)</strong></p>
<p>I am personally of the belief that individuation as a phenomenon cannot be systematically modeled, and particularly that Jung's framework for it is glaringly incomplete. Before delving into specific criticisms of the ideas that have been outlined above, however, I think that it is&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6335"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/exploring-links-between-psychoanalysis-and-ct-discord-convo-port/#post-21168" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9f4cfd7b44f044e28baa04d3bea91a85</guid>
				<title>safsom started the topic Moving away from Jungian notation in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/moving-away-from-jungian-notation/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2020 07:04:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meditating recently on the computational metaphor and the breakdowns of the metabolic processes laid down therein has helped me realize both the theoretical (in principle) and practical (observable) differences between CT's functions (insofar as a function here refers to a certain psychological process) and the Jungian descriptions of the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6313"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/moving-away-from-jungian-notation/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">86cc815085c496e7a671b409b29f94c7</guid>
				<title>safsom and Vin are now friends</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/6310/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2020 11:12:56 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5a96b997c6f04f2958da77281b56573c</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Intelligence &#038; Abstraction vs Association/N in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/intelligence-abstraction-vs-association-n/#post-20504</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:10:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insightful reply, Auburn, and I agree with many of your observations of the temperaments - though they do have a certain validity to them, function quadrants as a whole seem to capture the epistemic tendencies of certain types far more accurately, and far more astutely. Indeed most of the explanations that were previously done via the temperaments&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6041"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/intelligence-abstraction-vs-association-n/#post-20504" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b7a8f16d8df42328eb61db8c3c753a23</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Intelligence &#038; Abstraction vs Association/N in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/intelligence-abstraction-vs-association-n/#post-20435</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2020 02:04:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very insightful comments and good posts being made on this thread. Having studied Jungian typology for a long time, and being immersed the process of constructing my own typological system, I too, have had to deal with the layers of "abstraction" that certain functions can deal with. The monopoly that intuition and thinking seems to have on&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6001"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/intelligence-abstraction-vs-association-n/#post-20435" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e07671979b16a7d0ec61a37eeb2ff984</guid>
				<title>safsom and Juan E. Sandoval are now friends</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/5993/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 07:00:09 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d78318f7e8d495ed7512856fe3d11408</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Attitudes of perception in polarized types in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/attitudes-of-perception-in-polarized-types/#post-20408</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:53:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s like I can trust Ni to make sense of everything passively and it does.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is interesting because the way you are framing it here makes it sound somewhat akin to a deductive process, one that's trying to solve a problem or reach an insight. You say your main priority is to explore information first and foremost, which implies a degree of s&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5990"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/attitudes-of-perception-in-polarized-types/#post-20408" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8b20d4eef391b5613a79bd833252c6f9</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic NiTe Paramahansa Yogananda in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/nite-paramahansa-yogananda/#post-20405</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:32:08 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure about Paramahansa Yogananda as you mention (though his work does seem fascinating) but I think that Ni itself as a function and the emergent properties of of an Ni-lead function stack (which implies the judgement axis being subordinate and having introverted extroverted sensing) lends itself naturally to a lot of the ideas you see&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5989"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/nite-paramahansa-yogananda/#post-20405" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5cb172c9cffd5688b33b5b21a8d07c72</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Suggestions on good Neural Network Resources? in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/suggestions-on-good-neural-network-resources/#post-20248</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 01:51:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what we've been using for computer science class:</p>
<p><a href="http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com/index.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com/index.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.deeplearningbook.org/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.deeplearningbook.org/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://colah.github.io/posts/2014-03-NN-Manifolds-Topology/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://colah.github.io/posts/2014-03-NN-Manifolds-Topology/</a></p>
<p>Playground to test networks on:</p>
<p><a href="https://playground.tensorflow.org" rel="nofollow ugc">https://playground.tensorflow.org</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f9b141b89ba4e45a0a7fcb6ac588cccd</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Attitudes of perception in polarized types in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/attitudes-of-perception-in-polarized-types/#post-20117</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 16:05:22 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/alice/' rel="nofollow ugc">@alice</a></p>
<p>One question - does this phenomenon of object immersion happen to you when you are studying abstract phenomena as well? I'm referring to entities that are purely metaphysical or theoretical without concrete manifestation - how does the physical immersion work in this case?</p>
<p>I am asking because theories are still phenomena external to the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5843"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/attitudes-of-perception-in-polarized-types/#post-20117" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ae538d088e4af23a1bfb8e8c3bbf428f</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Is God an entity, or something else? in the forum Spirituality &#038; Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/is-god-an-entity-or-something-else/#post-20116</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 15:44:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It would take a synthesis of these two parts of the human psyche in order to gain higher understanding and knowledge while retaining the ‘lustful’ and ‘erotic’ elements responsible for human progress.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don't think I agree with this premise because the 'lustful' and 'erotic' elements (the unconscious libido, as you have mentioned in your analysi&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5842"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/is-god-an-entity-or-something-else/#post-20116" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2be6c4f13fdc1541728fe2491ec7002d</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Is God an entity, or something else? in the forum Spirituality &#038; Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/is-god-an-entity-or-something-else/#post-20006</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 08:25:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And it’s often said that God is benevolent, I think this notion comes from the fact that overall humanity is benevolent towards its own existence, else we wouldn’t exist. Often God is conceptualized as being ‘infinite’ or ‘beyond description’ and indeed, we cannot describe what is utterly unconscious to us and as Jung said, the depths of the unco&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5834"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/is-god-an-entity-or-something-else/#post-20006" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b8d6c51fdc08c9fc6709060a843505e2</guid>
				<title>safsom started the topic Attitudes of perception in polarized types in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/attitudes-of-perception-in-polarized-types/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2020 15:57:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the formulation of my own typological system (which has its root in Jung but the methods used within it being epistemological rather than vultological), I have recently begun to root out the core differences between the two attitudes of perception - delineated here as introverted and extroverted perception. Before expounding on my analyses of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5829"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/attitudes-of-perception-in-polarized-types/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c79cb9aaa1a056609c45f86ccc87a044</guid>
				<title>safsom started the topic Is God an entity, or something else? in the forum Spirituality &#038; Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/is-god-an-entity-or-something-else/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 16:17:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This question (the question of the ontological status of God), to me, seems impossible to answer. Here is a possible logical argument that I can see arising to support a line of reasoning of "god" as an entity (where I will define an entity in the body of the argument itself). The ontology behind this argument does not really have any external&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5698"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/is-god-an-entity-or-something-else/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">066a736bb1faf82780e11644df4f5766</guid>
				<title>safsom and Celeste are now friends</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/5598/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 00:13:32 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dec9d2684e8bc1af87e7ce5783659bc3</guid>
				<title>safsom replied to the topic Vultology Quiz #5 in the forum Vultology &#038; Learning Center</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/vultology-quiz-5/#post-19324</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 01:59:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">150a96ab10f4d2d1cc5b96da09e0966e</guid>
				<title>safsom changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/5203/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:52:34 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">65490bbd36b110fd8ac3c118ba024cc9</guid>
				<title>safsom&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/5202/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>