<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cognitive Typology | Mitchell Newman | Activity</title>
	<link>https://cognitivetype.com/members/varlawend/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cognitivetype.com/members/varlawend/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Mitchell Newman.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 13:13:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">79183cb965f0b5c30f2456a48d6af959</guid>
				<title>Mitchell Newman replied to the topic Publication: Occupational Differences Across Vultological Types in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/publication-occupational-differences-across-vultological-types/#post-30732</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 17:37:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on this page (<a href="https://cognitivetypology.com/index.php?title=Occupations" rel="nofollow ugc">https://cognitivetypology.com/index.php?title=Occupations</a>), which I believe is based on the original study, I just organized the occupations based on their divergence from the typical mean within each dominant function, and this is what I got. I also included any types after the main one which have a higher than average&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10179"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/publication-occupational-differences-across-vultological-types/#post-30732" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2a8f86fc47c50797779b2452cf435d63</guid>
				<title>Mitchell Newman replied to the topic Emotional Attitudes (Updated) in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/emotional-attitudes-updated/#post-24731</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2020 09:28:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's an interesting response Janie, and I actually relate to it a lot.  I agree that it's not always the case and did not mean to say that it was, but the fact that it isn't always the case (especially for the reasons that you lay out) raises some interesting questions for me:</p>
<p>I have also struggled with an avoidant attachment style in my life,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6799"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/emotional-attitudes-updated/#post-24731" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e597d3c065730fbfa2b40a1a967e7ef5</guid>
				<title>Mitchell Newman replied to the topic Emotional Attitudes (Updated) in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/emotional-attitudes-updated/#post-24729</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2020 02:50:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing this reminds me a lot of is Enneagram.  Agreeable (Adaptive, Seelie) seems likely to have enneagram 9 for their gut fix.  Disagreeable (Directive, Unseelie) more likely enneagram 8 or 1 for their gut fix.  This even relates to the emotional boundaries point: 9’s have softer, more permeable boundaries and having a harder time saying no,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6797"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/emotional-attitudes-updated/#post-24729" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5dcb3cc5e715eaf60abe30519424b96b</guid>
				<title>Mitchell Newman replied to the topic Psychological Surveys in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/psychological-surveys/#post-23637</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 01:52:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img loading="lazy" src="https://cognitivetype.com/wp-content/uploads/hm_bbpui/23637/opwfz4tkqbw6xxlassx8aus2mu92yvmf.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>Here are my results.  Not super differentiated from one another; they are all pretty similar.  Je is clearly the furthest from my focus, but it could be more neglected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2f6f0538f5ca4ffbb2a8cb7f97a75f19</guid>
				<title>Mitchell Newman started the topic CT Quadrants and &#034;types of history&#034; in Nietzsche and Heidegger in the forum Spirituality &#038; Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ct-quadrants-and-types-of-history-in-nietzsche-and-heidegger/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2020 06:59:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading today about Nietzsche's view, I think also adopted by Heidegger, of 3 types of history (Nietzsche also adumbrated two more): <a href="https://epochemagazine.org/nietzsches-rift-heidegger-s-pathway-to-thinking-e0fc0febf09d" rel="nofollow ugc">https://epochemagazine.org/nietzsches-rift-heidegger-s-pathway-to-thinking-e0fc0febf09d</a> (more background in this article and in their respective philosophies if you want to read it)</p>
<blockquote><p>As children, we have all&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6441"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/ct-quadrants-and-types-of-history-in-nietzsche-and-heidegger/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6a78127a4402d984deba5364c946c5e8</guid>
				<title>Mitchell Newman replied to the topic Future Timeline? in the forum Politics &#038; Current Events</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/future-timeline/#post-21227</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2020 21:00:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very rich and realistic on the whole and hints at an impressive knowledge base.</p>
<p>Part of me wonders whether the "can computers be sentient" debate will ever actually end.  But since we generally orient ourselves by their behavior in any case, it may not matter for your predictions.  Such philosophical questions sometimes turn out to be m&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6369"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/future-timeline/#post-21227" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ac82efe5d093a10b0a318a0867821644</guid>
				<title>Mitchell Newman changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/6368/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2020 20:31:18 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">06ba53637cd6ad2476d9a2dcad62ff69</guid>
				<title>Mitchell Newman replied to the topic A Computational Metaphor PT-2: V &#038; M in the forum Model 2 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/a-computational-metaphor-pt-2-v-m/#post-21208</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 01:13:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the bit about Si rambles and how it gets further and further from the topic.  I do that a lot where I sprinkle random anecdotes in certain topics I love (like Star Wars) and it confuses people.  They’re like, why is this relevant?  To me it feels just to provide the background info, like I’m immersing them in the story.  I wonder if that so&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6357"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/a-computational-metaphor-pt-2-v-m/#post-21208" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0889e165dd8b6a6ed8594650c013033a</guid>
				<title>Mitchell Newman&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/6306/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>