<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cognitive Typology | Jessica Visher | Activity</title>
	<link>https://cognitivetype.com/members/jessica-visher/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cognitivetype.com/members/jessica-visher/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Jessica Visher.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 13:13:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">311b92132cf06faec7a1392bedadfada</guid>
				<title>Jessica Visher and LadyNerdsky are now friends</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/6493/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2020 02:21:31 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6b6ac838a42580d0dd487db0ea9f34f0</guid>
				<title>Jessica Visher replied to the topic Unseelie Fi Description in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/unseelie-fi-description/page/2/#post-21107</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:50:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/mandy-horine/' rel="nofollow ugc">@mandy-horine</a> that's cool you got typed! One of the things I have noticed is how different two types can seem if one has the lower functions conscious and the others do not. If you are a TeSi I-II you probably won't meet another TeSi like you. That's not a "typical" development level. My husband is a SiTe II-I and you would NEVER think he was Si&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-6307"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/unseelie-fi-description/page/2/#post-21107" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a905fda3b2fdf7d5f4b35f6a9b6404f3</guid>
				<title>Jessica Visher replied to the topic New CT Video Series in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/new-ct-video-series/#post-19486</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2020 12:33:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was good! The graphics look great and crisp and you do a good job explaining. I would however mic your interviewer. It sticks out because of the rest of the video looks so professional so not having a properly mic'ed (micced?) person throws it off a little.</p>
<p>You had mentioned this in a post somewhere but because of other typology system&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5520"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/new-ct-video-series/#post-19486" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ad9beb7afc509a1d443c74731b2732c3</guid>
				<title>Jessica Visher started the topic What do you guys think of the Socionics model for interpersonal relationships? in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/what-do-you-guys-think-of-the-socionics-model-for-interpersonal-relationships/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:17:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't know how well Socionics translates to CT. I'm guessing it does a little better than MBTI. I don't find Socionics to be of much use in typing oneself or others but I do really like their model for how different types interact. It's not perfect, but it's a fun concept. Is duality a thing in CT? Or a theory of what types work well or do not&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5467"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/what-do-you-guys-think-of-the-socionics-model-for-interpersonal-relationships/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8748b6fce7375ee8b75b0ae62e523edd</guid>
				<title>Jessica Visher changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/5450/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 22:49:23 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">149ce3b83d8660dfed0f966d6475df78</guid>
				<title>Jessica Visher started the topic Frequency of types and development? in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/frequency-of-types-and-development/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 22:47:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the frequency of the types in the general public according to CT? I am assuming this will differ from MBTI.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Also, what are the most common and least common developments? Is it pretty standard that I--- and II-- are more common or does it different depending on the type?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a68d1cc7c5fbbe6b37746d5212d74303</guid>
				<title>Jessica Visher&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/5255/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2020 17:28:09 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>