<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cognitive Typology | Pine | Activity</title>
	<link>https://cognitivetype.com/members/pine/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cognitivetype.com/members/pine/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Pine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 13:13:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">468dbffc584b6dd53dda7770cc6e9a7c</guid>
				<title>Pine replied to the topic Developing to IIII? in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/developing-to-llll/#post-14537</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2019 22:59:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the light of <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/staas/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Staas</a>’ and <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/rondo/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Rondo</a>’s differing interpretations: I’ve wondered for a while, if individuals with the Ti/Fe axis perceive function-development as more of an epic battle, rather than as an organic unfolding. While the latter would apply to individuals with the Fi/Te axis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">25449f3347eb2d8a5bd13bb8a4c0c30e</guid>
				<title>Pine replied to the topic Developing to IIII? in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/developing-to-llll/#post-14536</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2019 22:51:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get the feeling that people grossly underestimate the influence of their primary caregivers. The first 10-or-so years of childhood is cementing a basis of self-concept and belief system. But since these psychic structures are mostly unconscious, people trace their function-developments to recent events; to conscious, tangible material; to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3272"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/developing-to-llll/#post-14536" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4f87dfcd6fd4027a212b8dc4f0ceea39</guid>
				<title>Pine replied to the topic [Introverts] Are you an essentialist? in the forum Type Specific</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/introverts-are-you-an-essentialist/#post-14445</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 22:39:23 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Re: Essentialism or nominalism</strong></p>
<p>I don’t think that reality is a bunch of closed systems. At least not from a higher dimensional perspective. Objects are influencing each other, so they must be present within the same system, without hard boundaries. Plurality is simply a perceptual feature; a concept, and the basis of all other concepts. The m&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3233"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/introverts-are-you-an-essentialist/#post-14445" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c41b4463b0e84b7d78536330e1d4902c</guid>
				<title>Pine replied to the topic Let&#039;s talk about shame in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/lets-talk-about-shame/#post-14378</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2019 18:16:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s a good point, <a href='https://cognitivetype.com/members/rondo/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Rondo</a>. Shame is an inherent law enforcement in the human apparatus. It serves the collective of humanity when formal systems fail.</p>
<p>From my perspective, those deeply disturbingly behaving police officers are unconscious of how all things are connected. DPD experienced themselves as separate from that schizophrenic man. They w&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3189"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/lets-talk-about-shame/#post-14378" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">21b65b96ac1952a7247a6e81a7290967</guid>
				<title>Pine replied to the topic Let&#039;s talk about shame in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/lets-talk-about-shame/#post-14363</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2019 12:47:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>– failing to do a natural, easy thing that anyone should be able to do. Like dancing. Or peeling potatoes the way they should be peeled.</p></blockquote>
<p>Me too! I feel extremely abnormal and I’m afraid that’ll become apparent if I try to do something particularly normal, and that people then will think that I’m retarded.</p>
<p>I agree; guilt isn’t image-dir&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3186"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/lets-talk-about-shame/#post-14363" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">80737f3a7ebfbe94652ea15497559608</guid>
				<title>Pine changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/3164/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 17:24:38 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6a5faa4da9eaa91c721a6c86bc480021</guid>
				<title>Pine replied to the topic Let&#039;s talk about shame in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/lets-talk-about-shame/#post-14275</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 10:52:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>[...] to feeling like the most outcasted, disgusting individual to society (I felt that in my most depressive episode so far, when I had been completely withdrawn).</p></blockquote>
<p>It makes sense that intense depressive states correlates with extreme separation/isolation of self. It’s awful.</p>
<blockquote><p>The man mentions that through transcranial magnetic stimulation on c&hellip;</p></blockquote>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3162"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/lets-talk-about-shame/#post-14275" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9a38eef45572504b0e6a3f89074a2a60</guid>
				<title>Pine started the topic Let&#039;s talk about shame in the forum General Psychology</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/lets-talk-about-shame/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 22:12:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve had a couple of discussions on Discord about shame. There seems to be a consensus saying that Fe experiences shame as a possibly temporarily painful but helpful pointer to what needs to be corrected about one’s character, while Fi experiences shame as a traumatizing thus ineffective penalty. This perceived trend goes in hand with the fun&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3155"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/lets-talk-about-shame/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b777359cc275141c0d36e2ea0ab03994</guid>
				<title>Pine changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/3137/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:31:17 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ec38a8a544357493bcc682f44d8de7f5</guid>
				<title>Pine&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/3136/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:45:06 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f768dc9dcbcd0394c9bbff37cd4ecae5</guid>
				<title>Pine replied to the topic Seelie &#038; Adaptive vs. Unseelie &#038; Directive: Is it Related to Conflict Avoidance? in the forum Model 1 Discussions</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/seelie-adaptive-vs-unseelie-directive-is-it-related-to-conflict-avoidance/page/2/#post-14222</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:40:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I conceptualize the experience of unseelieness as being within a fish bowl instead of being in the ocean (that'd be seelieness). It brings a sense of safety and possibly integrity, since one doesn’t get pulled into the currents of outer desires, or overturned by waves of outer fears. In some circumstances, it’s much easier to remain embodied – t&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3135"><a href="https://cognitivetype.com/forums/topic/seelie-adaptive-vs-unseelie-directive-is-it-related-to-conflict-avoidance/page/2/#post-14222" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0468516a09b87a3d9f19096f06927ef7</guid>
				<title>Pine&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://cognitivetype.com/main/p/528/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:29:14 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>