Reply To: Harry Potter's Fictional Type Index › Forums › Cognitive Functions › Harry Potter's Fictional Type › Reply To: Harry Potter's Fictional Type AnimalParticipant Type: SeFiDevelopment: lll-Attitude: Unseelie @auburn I think “Savior” is perfect. Seriously. I’ll comment at more length a little later, but I think that solves the problem perfectly. I wonder if anyone else has objections to it? It seems to me that “Savior” is an ideal solution.