- Type: NeFi
- Development: l--l
- Attitude: Seelie
Epic, I think you’ve made an important distinction between conductors and revisors. It’s said that Ne looks at many theories while Ni sticks to one and continues to doubt it. But I think we can apply that to Pe v Pi as well.
I very much resonate with your approach. I take the important principles from theories and shape mine. I think I would react the same under criticism, not scraping the whole thing entirely but repositioning some of the architecture. For me (Ne) that generally involves making a finer distinction.
I can see when SeTi are choosing the most promising course because something has to be done. This is when you see the mid brow raise I was talking about with Tobes. He said he uses it when he’s about to BS, but I think it’s more than that. It’s also abut rejecting a competing line of information in the absence of absolute certainty, and sometimes that’s out of sheer need.