- Type: TiNe
- Development: l--l
- Attitude: Adaptive
Fascinating results so far! I could say a lot but I’ll wait to see who else pitches in.
@fayest42 , hehe, yeah bella called this Ji minimalism. Alexander had the same problem, getting very low scores on everything due to perpetual questioning and nitpicking the questions themselves. He’s got very Ji heavy vultology too.
I’ll see if I can clarify the question phrasing. I expected to run into some of these framing issues. I do think there are ways to capture more of the ‘flaws/struggles’ aspect, rather than just capturing the positively affirmed aspects.
For those who scored highest on a function that does not match their lead in vultology, what do you think of the result?
Do you think it more accurately reflects your psychology, or was there something about the framing of the questions that enabled that test output? Do you think the questions are in need of work, or were too lenient/strict in some ways? …or do you think the face-value results better match you, when reading the full energetic profiles?