- Type: SeTi
- Development: l--l
- Attitude: Directive
I won’t go back into the past and dig up names, but an FiNe said that the scientific community doesn’t respect Jordan Peterson and that CT would be more accepted if JP wasn’t a core aspect.
I mentioned that JP’s should have an equal voice [where if his logic fits then it shouldn’t tampered with].
Are there any Fi users that understand how that attitude toward JP might somehow be okay?