- Type: FiSe
- Development: ll--
- Attitude: Unseelie
Maybe all we need here is a change of nomenclature! I’m honestly surprised that my Fi-lead, non Je-having ass is suggesting a rebrand, but what if we shifted focus from language like “development” and “level”, and instead switched to possibly more neutral language, like “structure of consciousness,” or “psychic structure”? (I’m sure somebody could think of something catchier).
That way, with maybe more awareness of the benefits of unconscious functions, we could instead say that my “functional structure” is ll–, or “natively ambiverted” if we wanted to move away from the original notation. l-l- could be “double extroverted”, etc etc.
All this, or we could continue this conversation as new people join and hopefully help stop people from thinking competitively. I agree that it seems to be a natural thought that llll is the “best” development when we are early in learning CT, but hopefully people do away with assumption quickly as they learn more about the system.