- Type: SeFi
- Development: ll--
- Attitude: Seelie
@sander – yes, this is what I think…that she grew it a bit in the meantime, but I’m not sure it’s developed now either, it just looks like she is using it more or at a higher…snippyness rate? 🙂
I’m glad the part about Se-Te helped, I’m not sure it’s correct, it’s just my impression.
And @tane -about the hyper femininity performance, I can’t really know what she does, but this is something I am partly familiar with and I can say for myself that I never tried to show more of the signals of my first 2 functions, but I do try to show more Te on purpose !!
I think I show pretty much the same or similar signals to Scarlett (with less Te) and with the difference that both my Fi and Se signals look more feminine AND more childish than hers, if that makes sense…? So, I sway more and I show more seelieness imo. And I really am like this ! I would have never done it on purpose, because there are a lot of disadvantages in it. I must pay effort to appear decisive and anyway I reach just a low level of decisiveness even in this case ! But to me even these small victories matter, to me managing to ask someone to give me my money back in a serious tone is an improvement ! I couldn’t do this 2 years ago, I needed to learn to do it ! So the seelie feminine part is not fake, but Te modulation is …well…I wouldn’t call it fake, let’s say it’s calculated. But from the outside it doesn’t look like this at all because people tend to perceive my seelieness as…a bit unusual. So they’d rather assume that the seelieness is part of a constructed image. But actually I am in the process of constructing the image of a confident and powerful woman, not that of a feminine one. :)))