Reply To: The evaluation of identity: Fi vs Ti

Home Page Forums Cognitive Functions The evaluation of identity: Fi vs Ti Reply To: The evaluation of identity: Fi vs Ti

EpicEntity
Participant
  • Type: SeTi
  • Development: l--l
  • Attitude: Directive

Streamline for Ji energetic abilities in the guides tab.
–scrutinize, refine, and condense inner frameworks for alignment to a personal β€˜purity’ sense
—– delicately parse out details within details
—– form castles, crystallizations, systems, backbones
–form your own customized semantics, concepts, and facilities.
—– develop a personal world of premise-based linked frameworks
—– develop idealisms, placement in universe, inner direction
—– honors diversity above similarity
— minimize influences from outside forces
—– honors inner direction above majority consensuses

Spoiler for original list

Pe:
—– exist in real-time,
—– think on your feet,
—– react to change,
—– be spontaneous,
—– have wit/humor,
—– explore,
—– take in new data immediately and flow with it
—– bounce back up after a disappointment
Je:
—– act, when action is necessary of you
—– get things done
—– speak fluently and rapidly without being clamped, having good rhetorical ability
—– debate/argue effectively
—– teach, and maybe lead if called upon to
—– think pragmatically
Ji:
—– withdraw and scrutinize inner realities for alignment to a personal β€˜purity’ sense
—– delicately parse things out
—– form castles and crystallizations
—– nurture an inner world of sound axiomatic frameworks
—– form idealisms and self-identities
—– honor the self above the collective, and not yield to outer pressures
—– hold to true north despite it being impractical or outwardly β€˜wrong’
Pi:
—– take things easy, with moderation rather than β€˜thirst’ or ambition
—– have temperance, an appropriate sense of β€˜pace’
—– have a panoramic view of the situation (tied to history and world events), not just the moment
—– not get ahead of oneself and be impulsive
—– avoid unnecessary risks

I can’t help but feel that Ji is far more complex and less comprehensible than the other three energetics. Although it could partly be interverted energetics needing more explanation.

What do you all think?

Did I take away any points I didn’t know was important?

Did I reach deeper level in some way?

  • This reply was modified 9 months, 1 week ago by EpicEntity.
  • This reply was modified 9 months, 1 week ago by EpicEntity.
  • This reply was modified 9 months, 1 week ago by EpicEntity.
  • This reply was modified 9 months, 1 week ago by EpicEntity.

Β© Copyright 2012-2020 J.E. Sandoval
SEE HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION

DISCLAIMER

The content on this site is not
intended for medical advice, diagnosis,
or treatment. Always seek the advice
of your physician or other qualified
health provider with questions you
may have regarding a medical condition.
For more information visit this link.