TeSi l–l

TeSi l–l Unseelie Female / The Rational Ethicist

Spoiler:

This was an unexpected discovery. When any J-lead is l–l in development, they develop a doubly rigid body posture. If you compare Ayn Rand to the TeSi l— women, you will immediately note that she is far more introverted but not in the TeSi ll– sense. Instead Ayn Rand is more introverted in the rigid/snappy/poised sense which completely resists inertia. Her body is absolutely resisting any randomness and every gesture comes out with deliberation before she returns again to a sedentary position. This is both unlike the TeSi l— and the TeSi ll–, indicating a different vultology altogether. This development also is prone to micro-jitters where the body remains so stiff that Te angular movements are confined to a very narrow space.

I was able to understand this better by seeing TeSi l–l Richard Dawkins below:

TeSi l–l Unseelie Male / The Scientific Ethicist

Spoiler:

At first it seems inconceivable that Richard Dawkins, of all people, has conscious Fi but it makes sense if you consider it is conscious and unseelie. Unseelie Fi, after all, is quite moralistic, disgust-prone, and defensive. Dawkins is famous for his heated disapproval of religion and he takes very personal offense to the indoctrination of children with unscientific information. Dawkins is a kind of Fi advocate here — of a similar sort who might advocate against physical child-abuse. Dawkins considers it a form of child-abuse that defenseless minds are told what to believe, especially when it is untrue. Dawkins, unlike his other TeSi businessman counterparts, is not driven by financial gains but instead by a compounded Te-Fi agenda of truth-seeking and moralistic proclamation.

Richard Dawkins, Ayn Rand and Germaine Greer (when older) have very similar vultologies characterized by a Je-lead commanding and accentuating vultology, but also a poised and receding posture. Their head nods are exceptionally jittery and concise.

Psychological Profile:

Psychologically, what differentiates these three from other TeSi’s is a very axiomatically airtight ideology which one might mistake for Ti in some areas. Ayn Rand’s philosophy is not a commentary on modern politics (re: TeSi l—), but a timeless principle-based paradigm. And this is the key psychological feature that is added by the conscious presence of Fi. The TeSi l–l is concerned, much like the Ji-leads, with arriving at the “right” universal positions in respect to philosophy, morality, and logic/reason.

Ayn Rand perhaps embodies this even stronger than Richard Dawkins, developing her philosophy of objectivism. And yet just like Dawkins (and unlike Ti-leads) she comes to a sort of principle-based conclusion that the way to live one’s life is to rely on nothing that isn’t supported by evidence. Like Dawkins she is deeply offended when people choose to act on whims and has her own grievances with love, sentimentality and the like. The effect we see here is as though a Ti-lead had arrived at the axiomatic conclusion that materialism is the philosopher’s stone. But the conclusion comes from a Te-Fi hybrid.

Like with the TeSi ll–, the TeSi l–l is somewhat ambiverted in their energy. Their Ji holds them back somewhat, while their Je pushes them forward. But unlike Ji-leads, there is no exerted push present. One does not get the sense that they’re Reviser types struggling to get their words out, but instead they are Je-lead types who have natural and easy articulations/gesticulations…. that are being clamped down by heavy Ji.